OLD: Fedora-24-20160227.n.1
NEW: Fedora-24-20160228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 281.31 KiB
Size of dropped packages:16.98 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 620.46 MiB
Size of d
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160229.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 85
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:16.98 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 939.52 MiB
Siz
OLD: Fedora-24-20160228.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160229.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 39
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 260.73 MiB
Size of downgrad
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160301.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 140
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.61 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 3.81 GiB
Size
OLD: Fedora-24-20160229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160229.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 3.09 GiB
Size of downgra
OLD: Fedora-24-20160301.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160301.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 97
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 200.64 KiB
Size of dropped packages:13.94 MiB
Size of upgraded packages: 2.31 GiB
Size of dow
OLD: Fedora-24-20160301.n.1
NEW: Fedora-24-20160302.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 380.32 MiB
Size of downgrad
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160303.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 146
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages:62.36 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 1.68 GiB
S
OLD: Fedora-24-20160302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160303.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 134
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages:62.36 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 2.02 GiB
Size of dow
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160303.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160304.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 267.00 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 2.21 GiB
Siz
OLD: Fedora-24-20160304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160304.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 901.29 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.66 GiB
Size of downgr
OLD: Fedora-24-20160303.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160304.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 421.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.56 GiB
Size of downg
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 3.15 GiB
Size o
OLD: Fedora-24-20160304.n.1
NEW: Fedora-24-20160305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 9
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.24 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.15 GiB
Size of downgrade
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 474.77 MiB
Siz
OLD: Fedora-24-20160305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 48
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 289.76 MiB
Size of downgr
OLD: Fedora-24-20160306.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 64
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 86.17 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 1.56 GiB
Size of downgra
OLD: Fedora-24-20160307.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160308.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:12.96 MiB
Size of upgraded packages: 2.64 GiB
Size of down
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160307.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160308.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 155
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.63 MiB
Size of dropped packages:12.96 MiB
Size of upgraded packages: 1.90 GiB
Si
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160306.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 265.36 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 2.26 GiB
Size
Hello everyone,
I'm working on beginner QA and Automation training curricula for a local hack
school in Sofia (https://github.com/atodorov/QA-101). I'm looking for examples
of badly written bug reports which students can read and discuss what
information is missing from them (e.g. why are they
On 9 March 2016 at 00:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm looking for reviewers for:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871
> Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
Have taken this one. I don't have anything for you to review in
exchange, but
Hi,
I've been working on a new content rating system called OARS. I wrote
up some notes on my blog[1] but I figured I should also post here for
comments as a lot of packagers also write and update AppData files.
The content rating system I'm going to be proposing has the potential
to cause all ki
On 03/08/2016 08:10 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:42:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
>>> lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> regards
>> I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:59:36PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The content rating system I'm going to be proposing has the potential
> to cause all kind of politics. We've not yet talked with the designers
There's also the question about the various existing ratings bodies (eg
PEGI or ESRB) an
On 9 March 2016 at 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> There's also the question about the various existing ratings bodies (eg
> PEGI or ESRB) and IMO we really should provice the means to capture and
> represent that data for a multiple jurisdictions simultaneously.
I covered that on my blog; it'll c
psabata changed pghmcfc's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Digest-CRC (f22) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-CRC/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
psabata changed pghmcfc's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Digest-CRC (f22)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-CRC/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
psabata changed owner of perl-Digest-CRC (f22) to 'pghmcfc'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-CRC/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/a
psabata changed pghmcfc's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Digest-CRC
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-CRC/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
psabata changed pghmcfc's 'commit' permission on perl-Digest-CRC (f22) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-CRC/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http:/
On 24 February 2016 at 17:30, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're at the last stages of preparing the first major owncloud update in a
> while.
>
> The current version of owncloud in Fedora is the fairly old stable 8.0
> release (presently 8.0.10) which we want to bring back in line with the
Hey,
I have orphaned the following packages in rawhide:
* starplot
* starplot-contrib
* starplot-gliese3
* starplot-yale5
StarPlot is a 3-dimensional star chart viewer [1]. I don't think it is
actively developed anymore - the last upstream release was in 2008. I
haven't touched it for 6 year
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
orphaning makes sense for me here, I've also decided not to include it
into Astronomy Spin due to dead upstream and some issues I had in past.
Btw: I just wanted to have a look at it now and it segfaults @Fedora
23, a rebuild is not enough, see
On Ter, 2016-03-08 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 12:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hello ,
> >
> > Packages not signed in F24 are breaking copr builds , but I need
> > copr
> > to test packages for F24 ...
> >
> > What should we do ? to workaround this problem.
> >
> >
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:35:17 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Meanwhile , can't we hack copr , with gpgcheck=0 in Fedora 24 repos.
> It will be much less stressful.
There was talk last cycle about adjusting fedora-repos for nogpg check
until bodhi enablement, but it means another fedora-repos update
[again, an event was created but the notification email got lost. I've
figured out why now - they're being sent from an address that wasn't
subscribed to the list. I've fixed that, so future notification emails
should work. Again sending this one manually.]
Announcing the creation of a new nightly
at all your users rewrite their code across 4
> % releases.
After the dnf build today composing broke again
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20160309.n.
1/logs/x86_64/buildinstall-Server.x86_64.log
I have yet again untagged the dnf build from rawhide, and given ne
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:53:44AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> I may understand the need.
> But what about "server" ?
> If you install a webapp which use gettext, the locale will be set
> according to the conneected user (ex Horde)
> Does that mean that such webapp should requires "qlibc-all-langpa
Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-24-20160308.0.iso now has sugar
108.1 and renders correctly but liveinst crashes and NM does not connect
* satellit_e qemu/kvm f23
On 03/09/2016 09:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
[again, an event was created but the notification email got lost. I've
figured out why now -
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-03-10 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-03-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-03-10 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-03-10 1
> On Ter, 2016-03-08 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Meanwhile , can't we hack copr , with gpgcheck=0 in Fedora 24 repos. It
> will be much less stressful.
Please don't. Having unchecked code shipped and installed is a risk we don't
need to take. How about signing every package instead, inc
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:10:14 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> > On Ter, 2016-03-08 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> > Meanwhile , can't we hack copr , with gpgcheck=0 in Fedora 24
> > repos. It will be much less stressful.
>
> Please don't. Having unchecked code shipped and installed
OLD: Fedora-24-20160308.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160309.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:1.50 MiB
Size of upgraded packages: 85.41 MiB
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160308.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160309.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 154
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages:433.54 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 1.63 GiB
Missing expected images:
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160308.n.0:
Cloud vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Cloud vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Cloud raw-xz i386
Cloud vagrant-virtualbox i386
Cloud vagrant-libvirt i386
Cloud qcow2 i386
Cloud qcow2 x86_64
Cloud r
Hi,
Dne 10.3.2016 v 01:31 Fedora Branched Report napsal(a):
> = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: scilab-6.0.0-0.1.beta1.fc24
> Old package: scilab-6.0.0-0.3.alpha2.fc24
> Summary: Scientific software package for numerical computations
> RPMs: scilab scilab-devel scilab-d
47 matches
Mail list logo
