Re: Self-Reintroduction: DJ Delorie

On 28 Jan 2016 19:42, "DJ Delorie" wrote: > > > I've been around for a while, but as I'm taking on a new role inside > Red Hat, I'll be showing up in different places here and upstream, so > I figured I'd refresh everyone's memory as well as announce the change :-) > Meanwhile, on LKML, "From: Li

F24 System Wide Change: Mono 4.2

= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4.2 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono4.2 Change owner(s): * Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz Update the Mono stack in Fedora to 4.2 aca Cyle 6 == Detailed Description == Mono 4.2 is the last release of Cycle 6 from Xamarin. See more details at Mono 4.

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Mono 4.2

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:43:40 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4.2 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono4.2 > > Change owner(s): > * Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz > > Update the Mono stack in Fedora to 4.2 aca Cyle 6 > > == Detailed Description == > Mono 4.

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata) perl-Algorithm-Merge (iarnell, psabata) perl-Authen-PAM (steve, psabata) perl-Carp-Clan-Share (iarnell, psabata) perl-Class-Container (ste

In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

Hi, folks! I thought this might be about the appropriate time to throw this out there. There hasn't been a big news press on this, but some of you may know that releng is fairly close to switching over to Pungi 4 for composes. For those of you who don't know: releng is fairly close to switching o

Re: Gnome always broken in Rawhide

Dne 29.1.2016 v 00:34 Jared K. Smith napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > am not even mentioning that gnome-shell now consumer like 18% of my > CPU, probably due to the constant spamming of my journal: > > Jan 22 10:29:26

Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

I've seen a few spec files with content like this: %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ --without-libavcodec CPPFLAGS='-DMagickLib=MagickCore -I/usr/include/ImageMagick' There's no backslash before the CPPFLAGS variable, so it's useless. Should rpmlimt

IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/29/2016 11:41 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0: > ... In file included from > ../../dist/include/mozilla/MathAlgorithms.h:15:0, from > /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/nsTArr

Re: IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0

On 01/29/2016 02:28 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:615:11: error: '::isinf' has not >> been declared using ::isinf; ^ >> /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:640:11: error: '::isnan' has not >> been declared using ::isnan; ^ >> /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/conf

Re: IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0: > > > ... In file included from > > ../../dist/include/mozilla/MathAlgorithms.h:15:0, from > > /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h:14, from > > /builddir/b

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:33:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! I thought this might be about the appropriate time to throw > this out there. > > There hasn't been a big news press on this, but some of you may know > that releng is fairly close to switching over to Pungi 4 for compos

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Fri 29 Jan 2016 02:51:31 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:33:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Hi, folks! I thought this might be about the appropriate time to throw >> this out there. >> >> There hasn't been a big news press on this, but some of you may know >>

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 23:30 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I had some further discussion with him and he was using "systemctl  > suspend" to do the suspend.  I tested that and Gnome doesn't lock > the  > screen.  I suspect there's a bug in there either with systemd or > Gnome  > because Gnome does hol

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:03:33PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On Fri 29 Jan 2016 02:51:31 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:33:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Hi, folks! I thought this might be about the appropriate time to throw > >> this out ther

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:25:49PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > needs to contain the same or a subset of that metadata. Ummm 'superset' even. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wor

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) > perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata) > perl-Algorithm-Merge (iarnell, psabata) > perl-Authen-PAM (steve, psa

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-29)

(Apologies for the late schedule.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-01-29 17:00

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-29)

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:51:31AM -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote: > #topic #1532 F24 System Wide Change: NewRpmDBFormat > .fesco 1532 > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1532 This question I asked is still unanswered (I even directly emailed the maintainer, to no effect): https://lists.fedorapr

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

Le 25/01/2016 23:34, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > The %defattr statement in the %files section of a spec is used to > specify the default mode and user/group for the files and directories > which follow. I don't plan to change any of my spec files before March 2017, with other EL-5 stuff. P

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

pysdm and gresistor fixed in master, no rebuild. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/29/2016 02:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0: >> >>> ... In file included from >>> ../../dist/include/mozilla/MathAlgorithms.h:1

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/14/2016 01:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Yup - I'm curious about this as well. Using sqlite [for example] > would solve the libguestfs issues I outlined in this thread, as well > as using a format which is robust and proven rather than some > half-baked homebrew thing. Well, we actuall

Re: IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Thanks for your explanation Jakub and Florian. > > This is build error from a new rebuild > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12725648), is it > caused by same issue? No, that is a mozilla/firefox/icecat/whatever

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On 01/29/2016 03:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata) perl-Algorithm-

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/29/2016 04:35 PM, Florian Festi wrote: > On 01/14/2016 01:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> Yup - I'm curious about this as well. Using sqlite [for example] >> would solve the libguestfs issues I outlined in this thread, as well >> as using a format which is robust and proven rather than s

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/13/2016 04:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:30:59PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> so there is no justification to declare one need to install from scratch >>> just because rpm which works for many years fine

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/16/2016 02:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Well the feature writeup is rather fuzzy on this. It says that in Fedora >> 24 rpm will be able to read both old and new format, but it also says >> that future RPM versions will drop support for the old format. So unless >

Re: rawhide report: 20160129 changes

I spent last night trying to resolve some more of the broken deps due to my recent Boost update. I made some more progress, and reported some failures to Bugzilla. Several of the remaining problems are all due to three packages that TBFS: mariabd, ogre and pcl Details below. On 29/01/16 11:38

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/13/2016 03:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Say, for example, that Fedora 24 moves to the new format. Will Fedora 34 > be able to read Fedora 24 RPM databases? Fedora 25 will. Fedora 34 will probably not. If it turns out that reading 10 releases old database is really, really important

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:53:08PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: > On 01/13/2016 03:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Say, for example, that Fedora 24 moves to the new format. Will Fedora 34 > > be able to read Fedora 24 RPM databases? > > Fedora 25 will. Fedora 34 will probably not. If it

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:07:57PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Another thing to think about is endianness and word size, since with > BDB we can examine, say, an i686 guest from an ppc64 host (and people > even do this). Also what about this part of my question? Rich. -- Richard Jones, V

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Friday, January 29, 2016 02:25:49 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:03:33PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > On Fri 29 Jan 2016 02:51:31 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:33:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> Hi, folks! I thoug

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something > you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries, > autotools gave you one bi

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On Monday, January 11, 2016 03:46:27 PM Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NewRpmDBFormat > > Change owner(s): > * Florian Festi < ffesti AT redhat DOT com > > > > Change format of the RPM Database from

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:18:03PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: > On 01/29/2016 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm still unclear why you don't just use sqlite 3. > > Among other things it is about 2 times lower than the current BDB > implementation. There's some question [see adjacent mes

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/29/2016 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:53:08PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: >> On 01/13/2016 03:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> Say, for example, that Fedora 24 moves to the new format. Will Fedora 34 >>> be able to read Fedora 24 RPM databases? >> >

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/29/2016 05:15 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday, January 11, 2016 03:46:27 PM Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NewRpmDBFormat >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Florian Festi < ffesti AT redhat DOT

Fedora Rawhide 20160129 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160128: Cloud disk raw i386 Games live x86_64 Design_suite live x86_64 Generic boot x86_64 Cloud disk qcow x86_64 Soas live x86_64 Xfce live x86_64 Cloud vagrant libvirt x86_64 Clou

Unresponsive Maintainer: brouhaha

The maintainer for python-cairocffi has been non-responsive for some time.  For example, I opened 1249821 in early August; never received a response; adamw finally did the deed for me.  I opened 1273567 in October, and have still not received a single response.  1288627 was opened in early December

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-22)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-01-29) === Meeting started by jsmith at 17:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-01-29/fesco.2016-01-29-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: rawhide report: 20160129 changes

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Several of the remaining problems are all > due to three packages that TBFS: mariabd, ogre and pcl I'll take a look at the pcl issue this weekend. Thanks, Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproj

intent to retire Scratch

Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is based on Adobe Air -- and hopefully _soon_ HTML5). I'd like to let go of ownership of th

Re: Self-Reintroduction: DJ Delorie

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:42:03PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > In my new role at Red Hat I'll be focusing more on glibc work, so > expect to see me poking my nose around there too now :-) Hi DJ! Welcome -- it's great to see the introduction even if you don't really need one. :) -- Matthew Miller

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:07:14AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5805 [...] > We have none of that info and its not yet on our radar. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/PriorityPipeline is > the list of things we have coming up. I th

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 23:30 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> I had some further discussion with him and he was using "systemctl >> suspend" to do the suspend. I tested that and Gnome doesn't lock >> the >> screen. I suspect there's a bug in

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

On 01/27/2016 10:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2016 11:26, "Neal Gompa" > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson > wrote: >> > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in >> > f

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

On 01/29/2016 11:18 AM, Florian Festi wrote: On 01/29/2016 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm still unclear why you don't just use sqlite 3. Among other things it is about 2 times lower than the current BDB implementation. As a third party in all this, I'd rather talent be applied to speed

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:16 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 23:30 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > I had some further discussion with him and he was using "systemctl > > > suspend" to do the suspend.  I tested that

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Change Proposal Name NewRpmDBFormat

FWIW I found the new database backend (not mentioned anywhere in the original submission). It is here: http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=tree;f=lib/backend/ndb Since this change has (rashly) been approved by FESCO, I guess we're going to be copying this code into some libguestfs tools, and we

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:16 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 23:30 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> > > I had some further discussion with him and he was usi

Re: Gnome keyring security in Fedora

On 01/29/2016 06:11 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Thanks for investigating this. Seems safe to assume it's a GNOME bug until proven otherwise. Would you be interested in filing a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org (component: gnome-session seems like a good guess)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Advertised OpenGL version clarification

Hi,  Some people have been asking for opengl 3 +  https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/8311/why-fedora-do-not-ship-o pengl-30-even-disable-it-for-intel-hw/  https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/80679/supertuxkart-not-workin g-after-fedora-23/?answer=80681#post-id-80681 Red Hat respons

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:56:03 +0100 Remi Collet wrote: > Le 25/01/2016 23:34, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > > The %defattr statement in the %files section of a spec is used to > > specify the default mode and user/group for the files and > > directories which follow. > > I don't plan to ch

Re: Advertised OpenGL version clarification

- Original Message - > From: "Sérgio Basto" > To: "Fedora devel" > Cc: "Adam Jackson" > Sent: Saturday, 30 January, 2016 9:48:55 AM > Subject: Advertised OpenGL version clarification > > Hi, > Some people have been asking for opengl 3 + > > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/8

Advertised OpenGL version clarification (with some typos fixed)

Hi,  Some people have been asking for Opengl 3+ on Fedora 23 https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/8311/why-fedora-do-not-ship-opengl-30-even-disable-it-for-intel-hw/   https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/80679/supertuxkart-not-working-after-fedora-23/?answer=80681#post-id-80681 Red H

Re: intent to retire Scratch

Il 29/Gen/2016 19:51, "Matthew Miller" ha scritto: > > Several years ago, I packaged up Scratch 1.4 -- the visual programming > language for kids. However, it never really worked perfectly (it's not > 64 bit clean) and upstream for this line is dead (as Scratch 2.0 is > based on Adobe Air -- and h

Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I've seen a few spec files with content like this: > > %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ >--without-libavcodec >CPPFLAGS='-DMagickLib=MagickCore -I/usr/include/ImageMagick' > > There's no bac