Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 18 Jan 2016 06:33, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote: >> >> I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable >> and bug free package manager. >> >> Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think >> critical

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Ian Malone
On 18 January 2016 at 01:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: >> But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable >> since a default package manager and all of its features have to work >> absolutely reliable. > >

Re: Packages URLs and download URLs

2016-01-18 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-01-15, Mattia Verga wrote: > I think having old, dead upstream packages for too long in Fedora is bad > and I see very little reasons for that. The reason is that users want the software. There are many upstream-unmaintained tools that do not have replacement. For example `indent' for fo

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.01.2016 um 02:32 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable since a default package manager and all of its features have to work absolutely reliable. When was the

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.01.2016 um 04:16 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:53:00 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: ...snip... why? because you don't type "dnf install kernel" instead "dnf upgrade" and "kernel-headers" *is never installed* in multiple versions Sure, you want upgrade/update to update in

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

2016-01-18 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 13:58 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > In chrony 2.2-pre1 was added support for system call filtering with > the kernel seccomp facility. In chrony it's mainly useful to reduce > the damage from attackers who can execute arbitrary code, e.g. > prevent > gaining the root privil

rawhide report: 20160118 changes

2016-01-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jan 18 05:15:02 UTC 2016 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

poppler soname bump in rawhide

2016-01-18 Thread Marek Kasik
Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.40.0 this Friday. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.40.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here: http://koji.fedoraproj

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

2016-01-18 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/18/2016 11:02 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > As Florian suggested it makes more sense to compartmentalize chrony so > that only a small controlled part of it needs to run with seccomp. My > recommendation, if you want to use libraries in the filtered code, make > their authors aware of

F24 side tag deadline

2016-01-18 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Hi All, With the mass rebuild for f24 coming up, all side tags need to be completed and merged back into f24 by the end of Business on Tuesday January 26th. Thanks Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ devel-a

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "James Hogarth" > On 18 Jan 2016 06:33, "Igor Gnatenko" < i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable and > > bug free package manager. > > > > Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think criti

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Heiko Adams
Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 07:05 -0500 schrieb Honza Šilhan: > > From: "James Hogarth" > > The autoremove reference might be the well known issue with > > packagekit, not > > dnf, that is not marking packages as installed rather than > > dependencies. > > > > The default dnf configuration is auto

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18/01/16 03:28 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On a side note it'd be nice if pk just called out to dnf so that they have a common backend which would prevent behaviour like this and would result in sharing a history database as well. Or at

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 18/01/16 07:05 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: yes, autoremoval issue could be either caused by bad packaging [1] or when you are installing packages via yum or packagekit [2]. We are working on better integration between DNF and PK so this could be fixed soon. At the meantime use this workaroun

Re: F24 side tag deadline

2016-01-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hi All, > > With the mass rebuild for f24 coming up, all side tags need to be completed > and merged back into f24 by the end of Business on Tuesday January 26th. > The Node.js work is nearly done. We made a lot of progress on Friday

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.01.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: And the fact that /var/log/dnf.rpm.log doesn't show updates done by PK is just annoying. Isn't there a single log file I can look at to see what was updated, and when? currently no because dnf, PK and yum-deprecated using different logging inst

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 18/01/16 07:05 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: >> >> yes, autoremoval issue could be either caused by bad packaging [1] or when >> you are >> installing packages via yum or packagekit [2]. We are working on better >> integration >> between DN

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Heiko Adams
Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 12:27 + schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > On 18/01/16 07:05 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: > > yes, autoremoval issue could be either caused by bad packaging [1] > > or when you are > > installing packages via yum or packagekit [2]. We are working on > > better integration > > b

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.01.2016 um 13:39 schrieb Heiko Adams: Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 12:27 + schrieb Jonathan Wakely: On 18/01/16 07:05 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: yes, autoremoval issue could be either caused by bad packaging [1] or when you are installing packages via yum or packagekit [2]. We are wor

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

2016-01-18 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:02:44AM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > As Florian suggested it makes more sense to compartmentalize chrony so > that only a small controlled part of it needs to run with seccomp. My > recommendation, if you want to use libraries in the filtered code, make > their

qt (4) no longer injects $RPM_OPT_FLAGS by default (on f24+)

2016-01-18 Thread Rex Dieter
In response to recent additions to default $RPM_OPT_FLAGS that depend on redhat-rpm-config to be present, and in response to bug http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1279265 Qt4's qmake will no longer inject $RPM_OPT_FLAGS any more, starting with qt-4.8.7-6.f24 Packages that use qmake will have to find s

Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC

2016-01-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hours. During the outage backend will stop processing new task and they will be queued in frontend and processed just after the outage. To convert UTC

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

2016-01-18 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 12:51 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/18/2016 11:02 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > > As Florian suggested it makes more sense to compartmentalize chrony > > so > > that only a small controlled part of it needs to run with seccomp. > > My > > recommendation, if yo

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

2016-01-18 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:34:12PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > A related topic is headers, which could be used for filtering. > Various systems add headers -- see examples below -- but again there's > not much consistency and the headers aren't particularly useful for > filtering. A standar

Re: Standard, consistent subject lines for automated emails

2016-01-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.01.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Matthew Miller: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:34:12PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: A related topic is headers, which could be used for filtering. Various systems add headers -- see examples below -- but again there's not much consistency and the headers aren't pa

Re: Testing chrony seccomp support

2016-01-18 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 12:51 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > glibc malloc can basically call *anything*.  We don't know what the > future will bring.  Currently, we use (off the top of my head, I > haven't > checked): > > * sbrk > * mmap > * mprotect > * munmap > * mremap > * madvise > * futex > * o

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:22:11 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > the case of *that thread* was a ordinary "dnf upgrade" with no local > packages involved ok. I think we are talking about different things then. I was addressing the issue where you download kernel rpms and dnf won't let you 'update' the

Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 in rawhide

2016-01-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:40:39 -0500, Pavel Kajaba wrote: we are going to change version of PostgreSQL from 9.4 to 9.5. Thanks, I have moved one machine to rawhide to test it and will me moving another machine where I use it, right after branch. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:23:44 -0500 Johnny Robeson wrote: > agreed. This is a major reason I choose not to participate on Fedora > lists. I can't trust that even the limited code of conduct that exists > will even be enforced. Yet, you read and are participating here? In any case feel free to m

Re: dnf still is unuseable

2016-01-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:46:06AM +, Ian Malone wrote: > On 18 January 2016 at 01:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > >> But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable > >> since a default package ma

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-01-18 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned mimepull [el6] was orphaned by gil Streaming API to access attachments from a MIME message https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mim

Re: Appdata files template for Fedora Workstation

2016-01-18 Thread Jiri Eischmann
Mattia Verga píše v Ne 17. 01. 2016 v 20:51 +0100: > Il 17/01/2016 18:58, Richard Hughes ha scritto: > > Are you using non-breaking UTF-8 spaces perhaps? Have a look in > > vim  > > and see if it has lots of control chars showing. At the moment > > even  > > xmllint won't validate it. Richard.  > T

Fedora Rawhide 20160118 compose check report

2016-01-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160117: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Cloud disk qcow x86_64 Cloud docker x86_64 Cloud vagrant libvirt x86_64 Cloud vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk qcow x86_64 Cloud disk raw x86_

bodhi - new update obsoleted an older update that had been submitted for stable

2016-01-18 Thread Richard Fearn
Hi, Until yesterday I had two findbugs-contrib 6.4.0 updates in testing: findbugs-contrib-6.4.0-1.fc22 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-36b05c38b8 findbugs-contrib-6.4.0-1.fc23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1e04f3b5f5 I submitted the F22 update for stabl

COPR repo in mock?

2016-01-18 Thread Dave Johansen
Are there any instructions on how to use a COPR repo when testing package builds with mock? My attempts at googling this sort of thing didn't turn anything up. Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: COPR repo in mock?

2016-01-18 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Are there any instructions on how to use a COPR repo when testing package builds with mock? My attempts at googling this sort of thing didn't turn anything up. Thanks, Dave Like any others. Provide information about repo to /etc/mock/YOURCONFIG.cfg In most cases in would be: /etc/mock/default.c