Am 15.01.2016 um 03:38 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:17:54PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
WHO defines that "dependency" and WHY?
when i say "mask, i want it refreshed when it is used" than *i mean*
that and there is no business to spit my logs on all machines a
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:38:08 +0100
Florian Festi wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 13.01.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Richard Hughes:
> >> On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald
> >> wrote:
> >>> so there is no justification to declare one need to install fr
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:24:36 +0100
Tomáš Smetana wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:38:08 +0100
> Florian Festi wrote:
>
> > On 01/13/2016 02:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 13.01.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Richard Hughes:
> > >> On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald
> > >> w
Hi,
osgi-resource-locator has been retired
It is now provided by glassfish-hk2-osgi-resource-locator >= 2.4.0
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298628
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1296758
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:42:17 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:24:36 +0100 Tomáš Smetana wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:38:08 +0100 Florian Festi wrote:
> > I tend to use systemd-nspawn containers for building rpms. So for
> > example, I have a Fedora 24 system and use its dnf t
On 2016-01-15 09:42, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:24:36 +0100
Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:38:08 +0100
Florian Festi wrote:
On 01/13/2016 02:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald
Hi fedora world,
I am glad to announce, we have released rebase-helper 0.7.0 with
upstream monitoring support.
Upstream Git Hub repo is here [1].
What is rebase-helper used for?
This tool helps you to rebase package to the latest version.
Steps are:
- It extracts old and new sources
- It appli
Compose started at Fri Jan 15 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[FlightGear-Atlas]
FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.15.cvs20141002.fc24.i686 requires
libGLEW.so.1.10
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serializat
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is a US Government/Department
> of Energy laboratory that UC Berkeley has a hand in managing. It was
> not founded by the University of California but came out of the post
> Manhatten project to build the hydrogen bomb. The US
On 01/14/2016 07:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
C - Find maintainers ( I would volunteer - I'd have to learn packaging)
>
>I'd certainly be willing to assist if it were allowed.
I will be honest and say I do not foresee this being allowed in an
official capacity. People are better off using the exis
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20160115. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160114
Images in Rawhide 20160114 but not this:
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Games live x86_64
Design_suite live x86_64
Workstation
Hello All!
I'm afraid I'm stuck with one of my packages. It fails to build on
i686 in Rawhide but builds fine if koji was started with
--arch-override=i686 (no other builds in parallel).
I suppose I run into some "limits exceeded" issue. Unfortunately all
I've got is the segfault during the docume
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:14:03 +0100
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> I'm afraid I'm stuck with one of my packages. It fails to build on
> i686 in Rawhide but builds fine if koji was started with
> --arch-override=i686 (no other builds in parallel).
>
> I suppose I run into some "limits exceed
Hi all,
I am seeking a maintainer/co-maintainer for samtools, as I am not able to
give the package the attention it deserves (there is a pending update atm).
Samtools is a program for working with high-throughput sequencing data. See
more at http://www.htslib.org.
Best regards,
Rasmus Ory Niels
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
Change owner(s):
* Kushal Das
Enable the use of BBC Micro Bit on Fedora systems. Users will be able
develop, and put in new code to their micro:bit devices using Fedora.
== Detailed Description ==
Mic
Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell?
What kind of "update" does it refer to?
Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji
since Dec 2015 already?
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Subject: the-new-hotness saw an update for eiciel, but pkgdb says the
maintainers
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 14:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde disk raw armhfp
> Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Workstation live x86_64
>
> No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160114
>
> Images in Rawhide 20160114 but not this:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell?
> What kind of "update" does it refer to?
> Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji
> since Dec 2015 already?
>
> [...]
>
> the-new-hotness saw an upd
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell?
> What kind of "update" does it refer to?
> Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji
> since Dec 2015 already?
>
> [...]
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:07 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8847/
>
> Yeah, looking at the message history for eicil helps show what
> happened:
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?package=eiciel
>
> It looks like someone added eicil to
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:09:39 +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell?
> > What kind of "update" does it refer to?
> > Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji
> > since Dec 2015 already?
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > the-new-hotness
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:07 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8847/
> >
> > Yeah, looking at the message history for eicil helps show what
> > happened:
> >
> > https://apps.fedoraproje
I was looking to the list at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring#Requesting_Help
and I found that all these packages have non-existent or broken
websites, nor I could found a way to found their sources.
In .spec files we provide URLs for website and sources of every pack
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 10:51 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Some fallout from the glew rebase in here, none of which is strictly
glew's fault as far as I can tell.
> [FlightGear-Atlas]
> FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.15.cvs20141002.fc24.i686 requires
> libGLEW.so.1.10
Map.o: In function `m
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> LLNL is still actively involved in the ZFS on Linux project, so they
> are still doing something with it.
>
Correct, and that can be discovered with a Google search - which found this:
*https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/sli
ZFS on Linux: Copyright and Licensing Issues (pdf created april 2013)
This was written by a lawyer, but the disclaimer is this is a cursory
evaluation, not legal advice.
http://www.rtt-law.com/public/files/docs/Williams%20-%20Software%20copyrights%20white%20paper.pdf
But I still predict bigger obs
I am going to build the latest version of tbb in Rawhide soon. Updating
alone does not cause any ABI breaks, according to libabigail, but enabling
C++11 features in tbb does, due to some changes in exception classes.
Those C++11 features can boost performance, therefore, I will rebuild
dependent p
Does anyone know how to contact Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams? I've been trying
to contact him in regards to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287273, and have also tried
contacting him via the email address in bugzilla, and have not received
any response.
It looks like he has not been ac
On 15/01/16 15:14 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
I am going to build the latest version of tbb in Rawhide soon. Updating
alone does not cause any ABI breaks, according to libabigail, but enabling
C++11 features in tbb does, due to some changes in exception classes.
Those C++11 features can boost perf
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I think this may explain the differences you're seeing:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange
>
> In short, the proper thing would be for the application in question to
> ilnk -lGL, you only just got away with the linker fixing it for you...
> until now
> A better approach if you care about readability is to stop trying to use
> one spec across everything. You don't need any
> %if clauses at all if you do that.
Well, I have not yet even written anything new to the spec file. This is a fork
of an official Fedora package, and I'm still trying to
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Well the feature writeup is rather fuzzy on this. It says that in Fedora
> 24 rpm will be able to read both old and new format, but it also says
> that future RPM versions will drop support for the old format. So unless
> there is a mandatory data format conversion duri
Christian Dersch wrote:
> I tried to contact tuxbrewr some weeks ago (due to quassel bug fixes and
> maintainance), without any response. Does anybody know how to contact
> him? I already tried smparr...@gmail.com without success.
FYI, it's been a long long time since we last heard from tuxbrewr h
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The julia language loads libraries at run time by using the .so filename.
> We work around this in the julia package by symlinking the needed sonames
> into %{_libdir}/julia/, e.g.:
>
> for lib in arpack cholmod dSFMT git2 fftw3_threads gmp mprf openlibm
> openspecfun pcr
Hi,
I plan on building bullet-2.83 in rawhide this weekend. Bullet uses a
soversion that's equal to the package version, so each bullet version
bump requires a rebuild of all dependent packages.
According to dnf, the following packages are affected:
$ dnf --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhid
Reindl Harald wrote:
> a standalone software with CDDL is a different topic
[snip]
> no, but when you link that incompatible code with the kernel which is
> GPLv2 code it's a complete different topic
Right. See also:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#cdrtools
for another case where an
Josh Boyer wrote:
> If you are creating a cert to sign the out-of-tree modules and expect
> it to be accepted by the kernel, it cannot be ephemeral. A user would
> need someway to import it into their kernel or have it passed from
> grub. The only way to do so is to have it embedded in shim or th
On 01/15/2016 06:40 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The julia language loads libraries at run time by using the .so filename.
We work around this in the julia package by symlinking the needed sonames
into %{_libdir}/julia/, e.g.:
for lib in arpack cholmod dSFMT git2 fftw3_threads
On 01/15/2016 07:31 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
Hi,
I plan on building bullet-2.83 in rawhide this weekend. Bullet uses a
soversion that's equal to the package version, so each bullet version
bump requires a rebuild of all dependent packages.
Just out of curiosity - has anyone ever tried educating
Josh Boyer wrote:
> This is a major part of why we disallowed them in the past and that
> was before any of the existing kernel team members were on the team
> yet. Our stance has not changed over time or with the introduction of
> new team members.
And I still believe that it is wrong to reject
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Right. See also:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#cdrtools
>
>
> for another case where an upstream attempted mixing GPL and CDDL code, and
> Red Hat Legal's and the FSF's stance on it.
>
Kevin, I don't believe that is the ca
# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-01-18
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers for different milestones, so
let's take some time to review them on Monday morning.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-01-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We have a few follow-ups from the
01-04 meeting, and I wanted to s
Hi
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Kevin, I don't believe that is the case in this instance. No one is
> talking about mixing code. If you do have something however specifically
> regarding the FSF stance on
> ZFS, I'd like to read it - I've searched and haven't been able
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It depends on exactly what FSF knows and how Canonical is planning to do
> this. It is not safe to assume FSF is even aware of all the details here.
> If you want FSF's opinion, they have a public contact address for
> licensing questions
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Kushal Das
>
> Enable the use of BBC Micro Bit on Fedora systems. Users will be able
> develop, and put in new code to thei
48 matches
Mail list logo
