Haïkel writes:
> 2016-01-07 9:07 GMT+01:00 Jan Synacek :
>> Hello Emacs fans,
>>
>> in case you want to try the latest Emacs and don't want to build it
>> yourselves...
>>
>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jsynacek/emacs-25/
>>
>
> Did you consider submitting a Feature proposal for F24?
No
On 2016-01-07, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed one of my packages (elfutils libelf) installs a small library
> of 90K but also 1MB of .mo locale files. Given that this package will
> always be installed because it is on the critical path I thought it
> might be nice to split the locale fi
On 07/01/16 15:40, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
we are going to change version of PostgreSQL from 9.4 to 9.5.
You should consider rebuilding these packages:
postgis is missing from those lists but also needs rebuilding if the
failures I'm seeing in koschei are anything to go by:
server started
+ cr
>From 9ca094fbf3af0d654b4299bf90fbea81aeb1c2a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:39:14 +
Subject: 1.71 bump
---
perl-URI.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/perl-URI.spec b/perl-URI.spec
ind
Hi Tom,
On Friday 08 of January 2016 08:49:25 Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 07/01/16 15:40, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
>
> > we are going to change version of PostgreSQL from 9.4 to 9.5.
> >
> > You should consider rebuilding these packages:
>
> postgis is missing from those lists but also needs rebuilding if
Hi,
unfortunately, I have to orphan the two Mana World packages tmw [1] and
tmw-music [2] since I don't use them any longer and don't have enough
time to maintain them properly. It would be great if somebody is still
interested in The Mana World and could take ownership.
As far as I can tell
Am 08.01.2016 um 05:34 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 21:27 -0700, Byron Steele wrote:
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.
org
I decided I would instruct Byron in how to unsubscribe from o
Compose started at Fri Jan 8 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
A few months after Fedora 23 was released we have:
- 1149 bug reports for Workstation
- 14 bug reports for Server
- 5 bug reports for Cloud
It doesn't mean that Server and Cloud variants are more stable.
Fedora Workstation users just use ABRT to report crashes more often.
Regards,
Jakub
On
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 01/07/2016 08:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I decided I would instruct Byron in how to unsubscribe from our mailing
list, when I discovered *I don't know how.*
It seems with HyperKitty we no longer have an easily-accessible way to
unsubscribe from our mailing lists. Ho
Hiya!
Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
differ from the spec?
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
On 8 January 2016 at 12:02, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Samuel Sieb writes:
>
>> On 01/07/2016 08:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>>
>>> I decided I would instruct Byron in how to unsubscribe from our mailing
>>> list, when I discovered *I don't know how.*
>>>
>>> It seems with HyperKitty we no long
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hiya!
>
> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
>
> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
> differ from the spec?
>
> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914
Got my
On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hiya!
Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
differ from the spec?
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 8 January 2016 at 12:02, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Samuel Sieb writes:
> >
> >> On 01/07/2016 08:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I decided I would instruct Byron in how to unsubscribe from our mailing
> >>> list, when I discover
Hi everybody,
I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream is dead
or maintainers do not respond:
repoview
rpmdepsize
snake
revisor
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@l
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:41 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so
> one
> just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after
> the
> next push.
That seems weird to me because I forgot to add a description in pkgdb
when I cre
Am 08.01.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Mark Bidewell:
Unfortunately GMail's web interface does not seem to recognize those
headers :(. So a fair number of uses will have issues.
what is the purpose of breaking DMARC by add a list-footer pointing to a
site with no unsubscribe-information
why can't
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:49:39PM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> A few months after Fedora 23 was released we have:
> - 1149 bug reports for Workstation
> - 14 bug reports for Server
> - 5 bug reports for Cloud
Do we have stats for non-edition reports? (Covering, e.g. other spins.)
--
Matthew Mill
Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> Hiya!
>>>
>>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
>>>
>>> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
On Sex, 2016-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream
> is dead or maintainers do not respond:
>
> repoview
have we a replace for repoview ?
> rpmdepsize
I didn't know the existence of this package
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:58:55 +0100, Dave Olsthoorn wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:41 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so
> > one
> > just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after
> > the
> > next push.
>
> Tha
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 08:31 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-01-07, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I noticed one of my packages (elfutils libelf) installs a small library
> > of 90K but also 1MB of .mo locale files. Given that this package will
> > always be installed because it is on the critical pat
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-01-08 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below c
$ git push -v
Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+
WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memtest86+'
FATAL: W any memtest86+ jskarvad DENIED by fallthru
(or you mis-spelled the reponame)
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correc
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 16:45 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> That's not pkgdb.
No, but it still reports "(no description in pkgdb)"
> This is: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ola/
>
> | rpms/ola (upstream)
> |
> | a framework for controlling entertainment lighting equipment
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160107
No images in Rawhide 20160107 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 3 of 61
ID: 2658Test: i386 kde_live default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 01:44:28 -
" mastaiza" wrote:
> I will write in Russian
Well, I don't read Russian, so not sure that will help...
> сложилось впечатление что в Fedora важно три вещи это Gnome ,
> Server , Cloud . Одним словом на первом месте стоит Redhad а всё
> остальное второстепенно
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> $ git push -v
> Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+
> WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memtest86+'
And what's up with this warning? I was just puzzling over that
myself. I haven't seen it before this m
Yes Cwickert a lot of packages . I understand that he has not time for all to
follow . one person piled on so much .
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2016 11:03 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Friday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://
Il giorno Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:46:07 +0100
Luigi Votta ha scritto:
> Hello,
> I've no sound on my (new) system (Skylake 6500, Asus H170-Pro),
> updated today to kernel (rebase) 4.3.3-300.
>
> In dmesg:
> [2.606535] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: CORB reset timeout#1,
> CORBRP=0
> [2.610741
Hi,
The current maintainer has requested[1] that he has no time to work
on redeclipse package and requested if any co-maintainers can help
this package.
Can someone interested in this game package, 9co-maintain this package?
Regards,
Parag
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Hello Fedora devs,
Who owns this account?
https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora
My initial hope was to get the F22 boxes[0] hosted there, in addition to
the current F23 ones[1]. Digging into that on #fedora-devel, dgilmore told
me that the account isn't official and the owner is unknown. Dave_o the
Last week I lost sound after upgrading from f22 to f23. I'm not sure if it
could be the same problem. In my case, I don't know exactly what happened, but
after upgrading, the system couldn't find the corresponding version of
kmod-nvidia and it seems that fedora automatically got a previous kern
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:34:04 +0530
Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
>The current maintainer has requested[1] that he has no time to work
> on redeclipse package and requested if any co-maintainers can help
> this package.
> Can someone interested in this game package, 9co-maintain this package
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> > On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >>> Hiya!
> >>>
> >>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
>
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-01-08)
===
Meeting started by dgilmore at 17:22:37 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-01-08/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On 01/08/2016 08:22 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
$ git push -v
Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+
WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memtest86+'
And what's up with this warning? I was just puzzling over that
On 01/08/2016 01:09 PM, Daniel Farrell wrote:
> Hello Fedora devs,
>
> Who owns this account?
>
> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora
>
> My initial hope was to get the F22 boxes[0] hosted there, in addition to
> the current F23 ones[1]. Digging into that on #fedora-devel, dgilmore told
> me th
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:12:37 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> $ git push -v
> Pushing to ssh://jskar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/memtest86+
> WARNING: 'memtest86+' is an alias for 'rpms/memtest86+'
> FATAL: W any memtest86+ jskarvad DENIED by fallthru
> (or you mis-spelled the reponame)
> fata
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.01.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Mark Bidewell:
> >Unfortunately GMail's web interface does not seem to recognize those
> >headers :(. So a fair number of uses will have issues.
>
> what is the purpose of breaking DMARC by add a
Greetings.
Next week we are going to be optimizing some cabling in our primary
datacenter. While we hope to avoid any unplanned outages, there may be
times when network cables are moved when services don't respond right
away.
As always, watch https://status.fedoraproject.org/ for Fedora
Infrastr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2016-01-12 17:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-01-12 17:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2016-01-12 02:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-01-12 02:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/In
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Any sites affected by these removals are broken in upstream Firefox. I don't
> see any reason Fedora software should be compatible with more sites than
> Firefox.
Agreed.
What will happen when upgrading Fedora 22 and Fedora 23 to Fedo
Am 08.01.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.01.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Mark Bidewell:
Unfortunately GMail's web interface does not seem to recognize those
headers :(. So a fair number of uses will have issues.
what is
47 matches
Mail list logo
