Compose started at Sat Dec 26 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Greetings,
I've been using Fedora with a "simple" LVM setup with no problems for the least
3 years. Recently I've decided to set up my laptop with LVM on top of LUKS in
F23. While migration from the previous setup was relatively painless, I've been
noting issues with shutdown: I consistently ob
On 24.12.2015 22:01, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of specfiles
> (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for lines
> matching "(? there were more than 1900 hits.
>
> Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think ther
Missing expected images:
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151225:
Workstation live i386
Images in Rawhide 20151225 but not this:
Lxde live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2 of 58
ID: 1770Test: i386 kde_liv
> "PS" == Petr Stodulka writes:
PS> zip, unzip, git, gzip - are false positives: found "%%" or just
PS> "define*" in changelog
I'm confused; none of those were in the list I posted.
PS> sed - fixed
For fun, what was there:
%ifos linux
%define _bindir /bin
%endif
Wow. I can't imagine the
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:37:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> For fun, what was there:
>
> %ifos linux
> %define _bindir /bin
> %endif
>
> Wow. I can't imagine the original purpose of that block, or how long
> ago it must have been added.
>
> However, why not actually remove it completely?
> "MS" == Michael Schwendt writes:
MS> %_bindir is not /bin
In Fedora there's not exactly much of a difference because of the
symlink. But why conditionalize it on "%ifos linux" in any case?
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/list
On 26.12.2015 22:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:37:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
>> For fun, what was there:
>>
>> %ifos linux
>> %define _bindir /bin
>> %endif
>>
>> Wow. I can't imagine the original purpose of that block, or how long
>> ago it must have been ad
Am 26.12.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Jason L Tibbitts III:
"MS" == Michael Schwendt writes:
MS> %_bindir is not /bin
In Fedora there's not exactly much of a difference because of the
symlink. But why conditionalize it on "%ifos linux" in any case?
there *is* a difference and hence of it i have
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:45:24 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> MS> %_bindir is not /bin
>
> In Fedora there's not exactly much of a difference because of the
> symlink.
Not true.
While "rpm -q --whatprovides …" queries follow symlinks, the same
cannot be said about dependencies in repodata
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'll be building libwep-0.5.0 and ucommon-7.0.0 this weekend.
>
> Affected packages for libwebp:
>
> efl
> freeimage
> gdal
> gegl03
> GraphicsMagick
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> ImageMagick
> kde-runtime-libs
> leptonica
> librast
Hello!
I wanted to add a package for erlang-zlib, but I noticed that the
upstream doesn't seem to have tagged any releases at all for the package:
https://github.com/processone/zlib/issues/6
Hopefully they will respond to my request, but if they do not, I am
curious - what is a good policy for p
I would prefer 0.0.0-0.1.git%{shortcommit}
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015, 7:33 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I wanted to add a package for erlang-zlib, but I noticed that the
> upstream doesn't seem to have tagged any releases at all for the package:
>
> https://github.com/processone/zlib/issues/6
I use sth. like:
%global gitrel .git%{commit_date}.%{shortcommit}
Version: 0.0.0
Release: 0.1%{?gitrel}%{?dist}
Am 27.12.2015 um 08:17 schrieb Igor Gnatenko:
I would prefer 0.0.0-0.1.git%{shortcommit}
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015, 7:33 AM Randy Barlow mailto:ra...@electronsweatshop.com>> wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
