Compose started at Sat Dec 12 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Missing expected images:
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151211:
Security live i386
No images in Rawhide 20151211 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 7 of 54
ID
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:28:17 -0500
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 06:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Well, to be clear, I still think it's good to sign packages...
>
> Yes, but just signing packages but allowing attacker-controlled
> metadata has various issues detailed in t
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:34:08 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> What about scrapping the existing bugzilla message, and instead
> posting the direct link to koji download the package:
>
> """To test the update now run:
> dnf upgrade https://koji.fp.o/update-/path-to.rpm
> https
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:06:17 -0700
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:04 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm interested in taking over beanstalkd (at least for EPEL) but
> > will
> > take it for all of fedora as well if the maintainer is completely
> >
On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 15:26 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
> Workstation live x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Kde disk raw armhfp
> Kde live i386
> Kde live x86_64
>
> Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151211:
>
> Security
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:48:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Sure, this is just making more clear what a number of testers do now
> anyhow, so I think it's a good idea.
>
> Can you file a bodhi ticket on it?
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/791
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
On Friday 11 December 2015 09:09:28 Paul Wouters wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 06:02 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
> > Why don't we plan this feature in two stages:
> > * Fedora 24: turn it on by default, but *keep using results* from bad DNS
> > servers,
> >just issue a user-visible warning, possibly with
Which components/packages are best candidates for adding a feature which
would make it easier for users to track changes from the default %config
%files on the system?
I've found this to be a deficiency, requiring users to do configuration
management independently of the installer tools on a syste
