Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 07:02 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Other strange case is the package perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc21  [2] > > even more strange [3] comment 16 says that push > > perl-Event-RPC-1.07-1.fc23 and one minute later comment 17 says > > perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc23 has been pushed to the

Re: python 3.5 openmp issue

- Original Message - > From: "Orion Poplawski" > To: "Fedora Python SIG" , "Robert > Kuska" , "Matej Stuchlik" > , "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:43:21 PM > Subject: python 3.5 openmp issue > > h5py build is failing with python 3.5

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

On 11/11/2015 09:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 07:02 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Other strange case is the package perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc21 [2] even more strange [3] comment 16 says that push perl-Event-RPC-1.07-1.fc23 and one minute later comment 17 says perl-Event-RP

rawhide report: 20151111 changes

Compose started at Wed Nov 11 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: wayland in rawhide

Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:32 PM, David Airlie wrote: > I'd rather we waited until wayland sessions are feature equivalent with X. Note this is in rawhide, early in the Fedora 24 devel cycle. If things don't work out, going back isn't hard. > Sweeping this under the carpet and then not provi

Re: systemd package bloat

Am 06.11.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Haïkel: 2015-11-06 16:35 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald : it's one thing that there is a common tarball containing everything, but 26 MB, 821 files including /usr/bin/machinectl and /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-machined useless on tiny virtual machines is too much and the be

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

> From: "Matthew Miller" > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:34:18PM -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote: > > "local update" used to work like that but it was requested to change > > this behaviour and we made it consistent with "remote update" [1]. > > You probably want to use `dnf install *.rpm` as Matthew poi

perl-Text-Soundex license change

perl-Text-Soundex-3.05 changes license from (Copyright only) to ((Copyright only) and (GPL+ or Artistic)). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-11-11)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run:   date -d '2015-11-11 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 08.11.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Björn Persson: > > Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from > >> em1 to eno1. > > > > On any computer where i

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 11.11.2015 um 16:23 schrieb Björn Persson: I tend to not listen much to people who tell me to do stuff without stating any reasons. If you want me to change, and you're not in a position to give me orders, then you need to explain why the thing I'm doing is bad. For MAC based name assignme

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 27/10/15 13:01 +0100, Marek Skalický wrote: On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 14:23 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility I guess this is what is causing problems if mongo-cxx-driver and an application using it do not use the same language version. Does someone k

Re: python 3.5 openmp issue

On 11/11/2015 03:28 AM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Orion Poplawski" >> >> This appears to be https://bugs.python.org/issue25150 for which there appears >> to be a patch. Could this be applied please? >> >> Thanks. > > Here you go > http://koji.fedoraprojec

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:21:13PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:06:51AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > em* and p?p? come from biosdevname, which should not be used and is > > > > d

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:29:10 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > No, the OP had it right. In some cases, we can wind up with older > updates being pushed over newer ones. That is, if an update > 'foo-2.0-1' is submitted, then an update 'foo-2.0-2' is submitted, > then 'foo-2.0-2' is pushed stable, the

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-11-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-11-11) === Meeting started by ajax at 18:00:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-11/fesco.2015-11-11-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

[Bug 1209748] Upgrade to new upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209748 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- stompclt-1.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 07.11.2015 um 05:00 schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: > >> On 06/11/15 07:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> But if upstream doesn't care, it's going to be a problem. :-( >>> Exactly - That's the actual problem. Upstream does not care a

Re: wayland in rawhide

> Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:32 PM, David Airlie wrote: > > I'd rather we waited until wayland sessions are feature equivalent with X. > Note this is in rawhide, early in the Fedora 24 devel cycle. If things don't > work out, going back isn't hard. > > > Sweeping this under the carpet

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 11.11.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Fred New: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote: Am 07.11.2015 um 05:00 schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: On 06/11/15 07:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: But if upstream doesn't care, it's going to b

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11 November 2015 at 13:20, Fred New wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 07.11.2015 um 05:00 schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: >>> >>> On 06/11/15 07:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > But if upstream doesn't care, it's going to be a problem. :-( >>

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-11-11 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-11-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-11-11 09:00 Wed US/Pacific PST 2015-11-11 12:00 Wed US/Eastern EST 2015-11-11 1

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 11.11.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 11.11.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Fred New: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald 10 year-old 32-bit system (Fedora 22) is the only place my LaserJet 4L printer works. My 64-bit systems drop control sequences (like they don't flush the output

Fedora Rawhide 20151111 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151110: Lxde live i386 Soas live x86_64 Scientific_kde live x86_64 Lxde disk raw armhfp Workstation disk raw armhfp Mate live i386 Images in Rawhide 20151110 bu

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Reindl Harald composed on 2015-11-11 22:10 (UTC+0100): > when you and the other 5 users think they can demand support for ancient > hardware forever because these days cheap hardware is too much cost i > tell you that my lifetime for adpot a ton of regressions cuased by > replacing perfect fine

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

On 11 November 2015 at 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 11.11.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >> >> Am 11.11.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Fred New: >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald >> any system not older than 10 years has SSE3 and frankly systems >>> older than 10

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 11.11.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Felix Miata: Reindl Harald composed on 2015-11-11 22:10 (UTC+0100): when you and the other 5 users think they can demand support for ancient hardware forever because these days cheap hardware is too much cost i tell you that my lifetime for adpot a ton of regres

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Reindl Harald composed on 2015-11-11 22:44 (UTC+0100): > Felix Miata composed: >> Must be nice to be affluent. This thread proves you simply don't get that not >> everyone is in position to buy, buy, buy to replace what ain't broke just >> because marketers and manufacturers have something ostens

Re: wayland in rawhide

Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:35 PM, David Airlie wrote: > Maybe trialing GNOME on wayland as the default is premature but removing the > option > on login to use GNOME on X is definitely. As such I respectfully ask you put > that > option back in rawhide. So just to be clear, there is an optio

Re: wayland in rawhide

> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to > the session > menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow. This is what the feature page said would happen in the first place. So I'm also confused why you didn't just do that. > > I will say you're coming off (to me anyway)

Re: wayland in rawhide

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:58 PM, David Airlie wrote: > >> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to >> the session >> menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow. > > This is what the feature page said would happen in the first place. So > I'm also confused why you didn't

Re: wayland in rawhide

Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:58 PM, David Airlie wrote: > >> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to >> the session >> menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow. > > This is what the feature page said would happen in the first place. So > I'm also confused why you di

Re: wayland in rawhide

On 11 November 2015 at 18:05, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:58 PM, David Airlie wrote: >> >>> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to >>> the session >>> menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow. >> >> This is what the feature page said would happen i

i3wm based minimal Spin?

Hi, What are the chances that a minimal desktop spin can be created for the 24 release? It would be nice to have a prepackaged "desktop environment" with the terminal as it's main focus. Dennis Chen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part smime.p7s Description: S/MIM

Re: i3wm based minimal Spin?

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Dennis Chen wrote: > Hi, > > What are the chances that a minimal desktop spin can be created for the > 24 release? It would be nice to have a prepackaged "desktop > environment" with the terminal as it's main focus. > > Dennis Chen > -- > devel mailing list > dev

Re: systemd package bloat

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 06.11.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Haïkel: >> >> 2015-11-06 16:35 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald : >>> >>> it's one thing that there is a common tarball containing everything, but >>> 26 >>> MB, 821 files including /usr/bin/machinectl and >>> /usr/lib

Re: wayland in rawhide

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:16:55PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:35 PM, David Airlie wrote: > > Maybe trialing GNOME on wayland as the default is premature but removing > > the option > > on login to use GNOME on X is definitely. As such I respectfully ask you > >

Re: wayland in rawhide

On 12/11/15 00:58, David Airlie wrote: Close all remaining feature parity gaps between the Wayland and the X11 session: input methods on-screen keyboard hi-dpi support clipboard proxy for xwayland attached modal dialogs tablet support startup notification

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

On 2015-11-11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The best thing we can do about these cases right now is for maintainers > to PAY ATTENTION. If you have multiple updates in flight for the same > package, please make sure they don't both go stable at the same time.=20 > That's ridiculous. Should I request for s

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

On 2015-11-11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Failing that, when you notice these issues after the fact, file a > releng ticket and we can retag things in the right order so it gets > fixed. > Here it is. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje