On 10/24/2015 02:19 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Got this is a resent koji rawhide build:
DEBUG util.py:393: No matching package to install: '/bin/csh'
I'm assuming this is a quirk of dnf now being the default, but needs to
get fixed.
This is dnf bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Am 24.10.2015 um 03:55 schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 18:19 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Got this is a resent koji rawhide build:
DEBUG util.py:393: No matching package to install: '/bin/csh'
I'm assuming this is a quirk of dnf now being the default, but needs
to
get fixed.
On 10/24/2015 03:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 18:19 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Got this is a resent koji rawhide build:
DEBUG util.py:393: No matching package to install: '/bin/csh'
I'm assuming this is a quirk of dnf now being the default, but needs
to
get fixed.
Compose started at Sat Oct 24 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Compose started at Sat Oct 24 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Updated Packages:
fedora-release-23-1
---
* Mon Oct 19 2015 Dennis Gilmore - 23-1
- setup for Fedora 23 GA
* Tue Sep 15 2015 Stephen Gallagher 23-0.19
- Do not clobber /etc/issue[.net] customizations
* Wed Sep 09 2015 St
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 11:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/24/2015 03:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 18:19 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > Got this is a resent koji rawhide build:
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:393: No matching package to install: '/bin/csh'
> > >
>
Hi,
4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
Can anyone update it ?
-thanks-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
> Can anyone update it ?
>
> -thanks-
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedora
Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner:
Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64"
and 4.1 was released a year ago without making it into Fedora
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
mailto:xose.vazq
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner:
>
>> Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
>>
>
> no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64"
> and 4.1 was released a year ago without making it into Fedora
>
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151023:
Cloud docker x86_64
Images in Rawhide 20151023 but not this:
Soas disk raw armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 49
ID: 7218Test: i386 universal server_simple_encrypted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
Is there any reason to leave log4cpp-1.1.1 in testing since over 7 months?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=log4cpp
Maintainer is not responding.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWK/
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:44:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
> Can anyone update it ?
Indeed, it seems unmaintaned in Fedora.
I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
an update for F23 also
13 matches
Mail list logo