[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Compose 3 (RC3) Available Now!

A little late [1], Fedora 23 Final Release Compose 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! RC3 contains fixes for all known blockers, plus some significant freeze exception issues; there are no outstanding proposed blockers, so we definitely want t

Fedora 23 Go/No-Go Meeting - 2nd round, on Thursday, October 29th, 4PM (UTC)

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for the second round of the Go/No-Go meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23. The meeting is scheduled at 4PM (UTC). Please follow the [FedoCal] link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone. [FedoCal] https://app

workstation/boot and workstation/netinst are identical

Hi, can somebody explain the purpose difference between workstation/boot/x86_64 and workstation/netinst/x86_64: [https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC3/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-23.iso and https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC3/Workstation/x

Update of Fedora 23 schedule

Hi, due to a slip of the Fedora 23 GA date, I have modified the schedule and re-planned all the remaining tasks. The new schedule is available at https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-key-tasks.html Please let me know in case you will find any discrepancy or anything missing. Regard

Re: workstation/boot and workstation/netinst are identical

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 09:53 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, > > can somebody explain the purpose difference between > workstation/boot/x86_64 and workstation/netinst/x86_64: > > [https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC3/Workstation/x86_64 > /iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-23.i

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: >> What are you supposed to do with MPI packaging for another language such >> as R? By the sound of it >> >> and friends will fail now. > As a short-term solution, it is always possible

rawhide report: 20151023 changes

Compose started at Fri Oct 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

perl-BSD-Resource license corrected

I corrected license tag on perl-BSD-Resource package from (LGPLv2 or Artistic 2.0) to ((LGPLv2 or Artistic 2.0) and (GPL+ or Artistic)). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:48:09AM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > At least I'd have > thought there needs to be some sort of hook for extensibility. This is be good idea. If it would be enough to add directories to the scan list in the dependency generator script. > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes

Re: ipset unmaintained

On 10/10/2015 10:37 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Can anyone update it ? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1145913 nonresponsive package maintainers: ipset https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1494 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

libicu upgrade to 56.1 with soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'll upgrade libicu to 56.1 in rawhide, which as usual comes with a soname bump. I requested a side tag for the builds, David Tardon will help with rebuilding the dependent packages. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key "ID" 0x65632

rpm changed behavior it terminates build if wrong version is specified

Hi, I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild (rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is not unsigned integer or mutilple separators are used. Example of wrong versions: Requires: pac

Koji: no space left on device

Just had a build fail: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11560206 Log says: 11560234 buildArch (subunit-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-22.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: Fault: : [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/mnt/koji/work/tasks/234/11560234'"> 0 free

Re: Koji: no space left on device

looking at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds all builds started to fail, including the new F22 kernel i was waiting for to test people pretending disk space and wasted ressources don't matter all the time should see here that it's not true - ressources are not cheap nor endless except

Fedora Rawhide 20151023 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151022 Images in Rawhide 20151022 but not this: Design_suite live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cinnamon live i386 Mate live i386 Workstation disk raw armhfp

Re: Koji: no space left on device

On 10/23/2015 11:12 AM, Jerry James wrote: Just had a build fail: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11560206 Me too, on multiple build nodes. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: Koji: no space left on device

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On 10/23/2015 11:12 AM, Jerry James wrote: >> >> Just had a build fail: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11560206 > > > Me too, on multiple build nodes. It's going to be a koji-wide problem since they all share a nfs moun

Re: Koji: no space left on device

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > It's going to be a koji-wide problem since they all share a nfs mount. > The issue is known about, the filesystem on the filer ran out of > inodes and it is currently being looked into. (As per a conversation I > observed in #fedora-releng on

FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

I happened to notice last night that: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/ seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything alphabetically up to 'beecrypt' and nothing after. Compare to the i386 dir, which looks full: https://dl.f

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

On 23 October 2015 at 14:52, Adam Williamson wrote: > I happened to notice last night that: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/ > > seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything > alphabetically up to 'beecrypt' and nothing

Re: Koji: no space left on device

On Oct 23, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Adam Miller > wrote: >> It's going to be a koji-wide problem since they all share a nfs mount. >> The issue is known about, the filesystem on the filer ran out of >> inodes and it is currently being looked into.

PSA: heads-up replacing mod_auth_kerb with mod_auth_gssapi

Hello fellow Fedora developers, I have relatively recently completed a project to replace the ancient and aging and unmaintained mod_auth_kerb Apache module with a new, slimmer, more modern and maintained module called mod_auth_gssapi[1]. The plan is to retire mod_auth_kerb soon and get it out

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I happened to notice last night that: > > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/ > > seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything > alphabetically up to 'beecrypt' and n

Re: rawhide report: 20151023 changes

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 10:52 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > [libreoffice] > 1:libreoffice-calc-5.0.3.1-1.fc24.i686 requires liborcus- > parser-0.8.so.0 > 1:libreoffice-calc-5.0.3.1-1.fc24.i This breaks Workstation live image compose, so a swift fix would be appreciated. -- A

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151023 compose check report

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:36 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: >  > Failed openQA tests: 22 of 49 So I took a quick look at this. There are a few 'real' fails but there's also a lot that basically look like timeouts. I suspect what's happening is that Rawhide debug kernels are making the tests r

dnf and file provides

Got this is a resent koji rawhide build: DEBUG util.py:393: No matching package to install: '/bin/csh' I'm assuming this is a quirk of dnf now being the default, but needs to get fixed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division

[Test-Announce] 2015-10-26 @ 1600 ** Fedora 23 Blocker Review

# F23 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-10-26 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It looks like we get to have at least one more F23 blocker review meeting before release (isn't that exciting!?). We have 2 newly proposed blockers to look at, and several accept

Re: dnf and file provides

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 18:19 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Got this is a resent koji rawhide build: > > DEBUG util.py:393:  No matching package to install: '/bin/csh' > > I'm assuming this is a quirk of dnf now being the default, but needs > to > get fixed. There is no /bin/csh in the package,

Self Introduction: Stephen Pollei

My name is Steve Pollei, and I've just submitted my first package review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274948 . It is just a collection of U.S. Government CA Certs that DOD(among others) uses. Various military websites use these certs for example: https://www.ebenefits.va.