rawhide report: 20151020 changes

2015-10-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 20 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

F-23 Branched report: 20151020 changes

2015-10-20 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 20 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [vfrnav] vfrnav-20141211-1.fc22.armv7hl requires libgps.so.21 vfrnav-utils-20141211-1.fc22.armv7hl requires libgdal.so.1 Broken deps for i386

Heads Up: New arpack coming to rawhide

2015-10-20 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Dear maintainers, I've just updated arpack to 3.3.0 in rawhide. There are two removed symbols compared to the latest version in rawhide (3.1.5), but none of the consumers seem to link against them so it should be safe. $ rpmsodiff arpack-3.1.5-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm arpack-3.3.0-1.b0f7a60git.fc24.x86_6

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:05:41AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Seriously? When I push out an update to testing, I already have done the > > tests on it in my system, and it *think* it is correct. What would be > > the point of pushing out something that is kn

Re: Kernel 4.2.3-200 stability problems and mouse cursor defects...

2015-10-20 Thread Alex G.S.
Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade to Fedora 23 Workstation, so I no longer have access to that version. Also on Fedora 23 I don't see that particular kernel bug. Everything seems to work great, I'll file any bugs if I see them. Thank you! On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Alex G.S.

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

2015-10-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said: > Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > Also, the problem is that RedHat still supports RHEL5 systems which > > for today standards are totally legacy and therefore it has to run on > > Python 2.4. > > The point of forking would be that the fork wouldn't h

fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

2015-10-20 Thread Christopher
Has anybody else noticed that the fedora-packages bug listing (linked from pkgdb) seems out of sync with bugzilla? For example, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zookeeper/bugs shows bugs which have been closed as being still open, and the counts are incorrect. Is this a known issue? -- dev

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

2015-10-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:56:01 + Christopher wrote: > Has anybody else noticed that the fedora-packages bug listing (linked > from pkgdb) seems out of sync with bugzilla? For example, > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/zookeeper/bugs shows bugs > which have been closed as being still ope

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines some links does not work

2015-10-20 Thread Jan Chaloupka
Hi, in section "Duplication of system libraries", both links to "No Bundled Libraries" and "Treatment Of Bundled Libraries" do not work. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines some links does not work

2015-10-20 Thread Jan Chaloupka
Ok, I should read it carefully. Links are working. Does it make sense to post here a link to the fpc ticket? On 10/20/2015 06:49 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: Hi, in section "Duplication of system libraries", both links to "No Bundled Libraries" and "Treatment Of Bundled Libraries" do not work.

Re: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines some links does not work

2015-10-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2015-10-20 at 18:52 +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote: > Ok, I should read it carefully. Links are working. Does it make sense > to post here a link to the fpc ticket? For me yes, what is the ticket ? > On 10/20/2015 06:49 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > in section "Duplication of s

Fedora Rawhide 20151020 compose check report

2015-10-20 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151019 No images in Rawhide 20151019 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 17 of 52 ID: 6708Test: i386 universal server_simple_encrypted ID: 6706Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 6705Test: x86_64

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

2015-10-20 Thread Ralph Bean
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but > it's not happened yet. ;( Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week! https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pulse/weekly We'll put out a

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

2015-10-20 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 19 October 2015 at 21:00, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: >> Also, the problem is that RedHat still supports RHEL5 systems which >> for today standards are totally legacy and therefore it has to run on >> Python 2.4. > > The point of forking would be that the fork wouldn't

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work, > there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just a way to > waste time. 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my data" do not make a quality of +9. They mean a package that

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

2015-10-20 Thread Petr Spacek
On 19.10.2015 19:32, Christopher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith > wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: >> >>> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror >>> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contri