On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, at 01:33, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
> > if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that
> > they are sticking with python2 for backwards compat with systems that
> > st
2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that
>> they are sticking with python2 for backwards compat with systems that
>> still need 2.4.
>
On 10/19/2015 11:37 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> 2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
>> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
>>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that
>>> they are sticking with python
Hello everyone,
does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works?
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 days I
have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg clone...
What is wrong? What next step I should do?
Thanks,
Marek
--
devel mailin
Dne 17.10.2015 v 23:55 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
> How can I do a variable expansion that doesn't have - before and after? I
> tried "slc${releasever}X" [1] and
> "slc$releaseverX" [2] but neither worked.
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> [1]:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/odb_2
Dne 19.10.2015 v 12:53 Marek Skalický napsal(a):
> Hello everyone,
> does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works?
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 days I
> have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg clone...
> What is wrong? W
Hi,
As per the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I am writing here to ask you, if any of you know how to get in contact with
T.C. Hollingsworth?
It appears he has been inactive for +6 months and I to contact
Compose started at Mon Oct 19 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Hi,
I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive
maintainer, "patches".
I am looking to update one of his packages, "nodejs"
It is currently at version 0.10 in our PkgDB but the current version is
4.2.1
I would be happy to update and maintain this package, but I do
You have to go through this process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I just filed a ticket to FESCo:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1492
- Original Message -
> From: "Chaoyi Zha"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> S
On 19/10/15 12:22, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive
maintainer, "patches".
I am looking to update one of his packages, "nodejs"
It is currently at version 0.10 in our PkgDB but the current version is
4.2.1
I would be happy to update a
Ah, there is a Node.js list? I'll look into it and see if anything is
going on over there.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 7:32 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 19/10/15 12:22, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
>
> > I think someone else has also recently e-mailed about this unresponsive
> > maintainer, "patches".
> >
> > I am
Node.js v0.12 has since become outdated. The page about updating it to 0.12
for F23 is likely outdated as well by now. We may want to create a new page
if it is needed.
Here is the latest "LTS" release:
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v4.2.1/
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 7:32 AM Chaoyi Zha wrote:
>
Hi Chaoyi,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
> Node.js v0.12 has since become outdated. The page about updating it to 0.12
> for F23 is likely outdated as well by now. We may want to create a new page
> if it is needed.
>
> Here is the latest "LTS" release:
> https://nodejs.org/e
Compose started at Mon Oct 19 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[openstack-swift]
openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib
Broken deps for i386
--
On 19/10/15 12:33, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
Ah, there is a Node.js list? I'll look into it and see if anything is
going on over there.
There is, yes: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/nodejs
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On 2015-10-16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> only rpm-mpi-hooks requires rpm-build for directory ownership, while
> javapackages-tools takes the route of owning the directory. However, I'd
> rather rpm-mpi-hooks not require rpm-build as it's not really necessary other
> than for this directory. The s
On 2015-10-19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 1. git clone …
> 2. commit your changes
> 3. git format-patch
> 4. attach to Bugzilla
>
The 3rd and 4th step can be simplified to "git send-bugzilla" command.
Although I think it can attach a patch only to already existing bug
report. This could be implemented
On 2015-10-19, Petr Pisar wrote:
> One can perceive the package packages as rpm-build plugins. Having the
> dependency on rpm-build does not look wrong in the end.
>
One must perceive the scripts as rpm-build plugins because they are
installed into rpm-build's package directory. Otherwise the were
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23.
The meeting is scheduled at 4PM (UTC). Please follow the [FedoCal]
link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone.
[FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.o
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:53:39 +0200
Marek Skalický wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works?
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6
> days I have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg
> clone... What i
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:12:42 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Perhaps GitLab might be more appealing, since it is a FOSS service
> and it could be brought in-house relatively easily?
Not really.
There was an effort started I think in 2012 or 2013 to package it...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
8 packages were orphaned
bouncycastle-pkix [epel7] was orphaned by gil
Bouncy Castle PKIX, CMS, EAC, TSP, PKCS, OCSP, CMP, and CRMF APIs
https://admin.fedoraproject.
This Thursday, we will meet on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2
to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the release of Fedora 23
on Tuesday, October 27, 2015.
Please note that this meeting will occur even if the release is
delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours earlie
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 06:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:53:39 +0200
> Marek Skalický wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> > does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works?
> > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6
> > days I have status
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:03:43 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:14:25 +0200 Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
>
> > That is a Bug of Bodhi, the URLs should be more descriptive.
> > (I have not filed it.)
>
> I thought it was filed, but I can't seem to find it now. ;(
There were filed an
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:35:49PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Under review, thanks for preparing ansible 2.0 landing :)
Haïkel,
I think I fixed the spec file w/r/t to your initial review comments.
Cheers,
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github}
Cloud Engineering / OpenStack
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror
> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull
> requests).
>
While I like the idea of making it easier for people to submit patches, I'm
n
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:33:38 +0200
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> There were filed and "fixed" exactly the opposite Bugs, to switch
> from NVRA to the FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e style:
> RFE: use update alias/updateid instead of update title in
> methods https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/18
If someone has time for a quick review I have submitted vtable-dumper:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273065
It is a new requirement from the same upstream for an existing package,
abi-dumper:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/abi-dumper/
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mail
On 10/19/2015 08:04 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
If someone has time for a quick review I have submitted vtable-dumper:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273065
It is a new requirement from the same upstream for an existing package,
abi-dumper:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packa
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:45:14AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma
> > (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pushed them
> > with autokarma disabled.
>
> And they should have, in any case, because
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'd think a pagure.io like frontend would but at somewhat of a
> different level than this. You would:
>
> * Go to the interface and create a fork of the package you want to
> change.
> * Clone that fork and work on it locally with the normal
On 10/19/2015 10:02 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:
Hi team,
I am working now on the fixing lib389 broken tests:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48303
And it's time for dsadmin_* tests. Can anybody, please, tell me more
about it?
As I see, Mark and Thierry worked on it, but any other team
membe
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Orion Poplawski
wrote:
> Taken. Perhaps you could take
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262965 ?
>
Got it.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:18:15AM -0400, Jeff Peeler wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'd think a pagure.io like frontend would but at somewhat of a
> > different level than this. You would:
> >
> > * Go to the interface and create a fork of the package you want to
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On 19.10.2015 17:04, opensou...@till.name wrote:
[...]
thinkfan orphan, madsa0 weeks ago
Taken.
[...]
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproj
Fedora Devel,
Just wanted to get more information on a bug that bit me over the weekend.
Running Fedora 22 and updated to 'kernel.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22'. There's
no mouse cursor on the login screen at all. When logging in either on X11
or the Wayland session I repeatedly get Kernel Oops messages
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
wrote:
> 2015-10-19 2:33 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
>> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
>>> if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that
>>> they are sticking w
On 10/18/2015 12:55 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> tktable package is newly under review; can someone clarify to me how
> to identify its license? (license file attached)
>
> In particular, i have a doubt about these "special notes":
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/17/2015 12:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora.
>> This package w
> "AT" == Antonio Trande writes:
AT> Probably i taken too much seriously this "type of joke", so much
AT> that this issue does not deserve any answer.
Well, if the license text says "you must buy me a beer of you see me" or
whatever then that would render the software non-free regardless. I
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>
>> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror
>> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull
>> requests).
>>
>
> While I lik
On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2015-10-02 21:20 GMT+02:00 Gerard Ryan :
>> On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede :
On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the fol
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151018:
Cloud docker x86_64
Design_suite live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
No images in 23 Branched 20151018 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 9 of 52
ID: 6642Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 6640
In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide.
The affected packages seem to be:
# repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source
"libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)"
OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src.rpm
OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src.rpm
OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src
Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan:
On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I still can't upgrade, I get:
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync
dnf system-upgrade reboot
Yes, I'm in the same situation. Would you mind adding the info of what
you get to the bu
On 10/19/2015 07:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan:
>> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> I still can't upgrade, I get:
>>>
>>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync
>>> dnf system-upgrade reboot
>>
>> Yes, I'm in the sa
Hi!
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 20:46, Richard Shaw wrote:
> In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide.
Thanks for the heads-up.
> The affected packages seem to be:
>
> # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source
> "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Feel free to bump&rebuild mkvtoolnix. I'm planning an update to 8.5.0,
> but I don't know if I'll be able to do it in time. Is there a new
> pugixml build I can test against?
I probably need to go
2015-10-19 20:47 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Gerard Ryan:
>>
>> On 10/18/2015 06:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>>
>>> I still can't upgrade, I get:
>>>
>>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync
>>> dnf system-upgrade reboot
>>
>>
>> Yes, I'm in
2015-10-19 20:46 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw :
> In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide.
> The affected packages seem to be:
>
> # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source
> "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)"
> OpenImageIO-1.5.20-1.fc24.src.rpm
> OpenIma
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Thx for the update.
> Can you verify that "long long" is enabled by default in the fedora build
> (as it should per this https://github.com/zeux/pugixml/issues/53 report)
>
> This will help me to switch filezilla to pugixml.
>
I can confi
2015-10-19 13:00 GMT+02:00 Viktor Jancik :
> Hi,
>
> As per the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I am writing here to ask you, if any of you know how to get in contact with
> T.C. Hollingsworth?
>
> It a
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! Time for a blocker status mail - well, past time, but I
> hadn't found time to do one till now.
Small addendum - I've added one more proposed blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273214 - spin-kickstarts
"Build
Hi folks! Time for a blocker status mail - well, past time, but I
hadn't found time to do one till now.
Status is that Go/No-Go is on Thursday: we really need an RC1 by
tomorrow in order to have sufficient testing time. Action summary:
Blocker reviewers
-
Review:
* https://bugzi
Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Also, the problem is that RedHat still supports RHEL5 systems which
> for today standards are totally legacy and therefore it has to run on
> Python 2.4.
The point of forking would be that the fork wouldn't have to care. Let the
upstream project deal with ancient
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Seriously? When I push out an update to testing, I already have done the
> tests on it in my system, and it *think* it is correct. What would be
> the point of pushing out something that is known to be broken?
>
> The time in testing is for others to others to
59 matches
Mail list logo
