Un-retiring tktable package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer, also latest release came out in Nov. 2008. However, upstream maintainer says TkTable development is not dea

Re: Un-retiring tktable package

On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. > This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer, > also latest release came out in Nov. 2008. > > H

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:06:01PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > The simple thing I think would be for rpm to own the > directory. Does that seem reasonable? Your proposed solution sounds good. FWIW another package that installs a file in this directory and thus 'Requires: rpm-build' is superm

rawhide report: 20151017 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 17 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

F-23 Branched report: 20151017 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 17 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [openstack-swift] openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib [python-fiat] python-fiat-1.5.0-2.fc23.noarch requires ScientificPython

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:04:32PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >No, so Wine violates: > > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits > It does not, just try notepad.exe, regedit.exe, clo

Re: Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:06:01 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for > use when building rpms. Currently that directory is owned by: > > rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 > javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch > > Of the various pa

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:48:48 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > yes , it is just autokarma thats messed up and push packages is one > way to fix the problem ..., which is easier . Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pus

Variable expansion in COPR external URL?

How can I do a variable expansion that doesn't have - before and after? I tried "slc${releasever}X" [1] and "slc$releaseverX" [2] but neither worked. Thanks, Dave [1]: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/odb_2.3_cern/epel-5-i386/00128584-odb/root.log.gz [2]: https://copr-be.

Re: unretiring valabind package

Hi gil, >1) maybe you should open a bug for review the package ... ? Yes I did already ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630 You know - chicken egg problem - the procedure says first announce on devel list, then create the review request. >2) you must use %license macro for LICE

Fedora Rawhide 20151017 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151016: Mate disk raw armhfp Images in Rawhide 20151016 but not this: Kde disk raw armhfp -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mail

Fedora 23 Branched 20151017 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151016 No images in 23 Branched 20151016 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a