On 10/08/2015 06:11 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
>>> hi
>>> i missing somethings...
>>> how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
>>> regards
>>> thanks in advance
>>> gil
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 06:11 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> >>> hi
> >>> i missing somethings...
> >>> how can set InitialCC with ja
On 10/08/2015 02:24 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Fedorapackager eclipse plugin has been neglected for quite some time and
> updates are broken after the Bodhi2 update.
> So are there any users left? Is anyone interested in maintaining it?
> Enhancing it?
> Any feedback is mor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271121
Bug ID: 1271121
Summary: Upgrade perl-Starlet to 0.26
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Starlet
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:51:26PM +0200, gil wrote:
>
>
> Il 08/10/2015 18:11, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
> >On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> >>>hi
> >>>i missing somethings...
> >>>how can set InitialCC with java-sig in
Il 13/10/2015 10:54, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/192
This is fixed in 1.31 which is now running in prod:)
Happy packaging!
Pierre
Thanks!
gil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same functionality
> > -> incompatible
>
> I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that
> packages from other distros will work, not "100% certain" (which is
>
On 2015-10-13, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same functionality
>> > -> incompatible
>>
>> I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that
>> packages from other distros will work, not "100% certain
- Original Message -
> On 2015-10-13, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> > 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same
> >> > functionality
> >> > -> incompatible
> >>
> >> I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that
> >> pack
Compose started at Tue Oct 13 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
Compose started at Tue Oct 13 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
From 812552a22c785450f6daf7c9ed87b4efd3554ac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:32:50 +0200
Subject: 1.25 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
...PI-1.13-Do-not-install-examples-into-PATH.patch | 35 --
pe
On 2015-10-13, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> We already did the "distributions aren't compatible" thing in the 90's.
>
Great. Then there is no (new) problem.
> If Ubuntu and Fedora binaries aren't compatible, which one do you think
> is going to get used by developers that need to generate programs run
Thanks guys ! got a Lenovo T410 and things just work great with Fedora 22 .
I ll keep tht list with me as i am planning to get another laptop in future
.
2015-10-11 19:51 GMT+01:00 Andrey Ponomarenko :
> Jules Bashizi wrote:
>
>> I got admission into some British university and I am to buy a lapt
Hey, everyone — this thread seems to be going off the rails. Discussion
about the importance and merits of distro uniqueness is of course fine,
but please keep it technical rather than personal.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
Hi folks,
today I managed to fix all critical issues regarding pexpect 4.x. Most
interested feature of this release is supporting asyncio.
Changelog: http://pexpect.readthedocs.org/en/stable/history.html#releases
I don't think that someone will see regressions, because I more or less
checked rel
On Friday, October 09, 2015 08:44:11 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:40:28 -0400
>
> Stephen Chandler Paul wrote:
> > Hi, I recently did a review swap with someone, and approved their
> > package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410
> > (I should note Lyude is the s
Hi all,
Today is an important day on the Fedora 23 schedule[1], with a
significant cut-offs.
Today is the Final Freeze[2]. This means that only packages which
fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Final composes. Other builds will rema
I frequently see various incantations that people use to determine what
packages need to be rebuilt based on an ABI/API incompatible change to a
library.
Shouldn't we have a best practice documented in the wiki for something
that's needed so frequently? And to take it one step further, how about
c
Ideally, Koschei[0] should be doing this for us, right?
[0]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I frequently see various incantations that people use to determine what
> packages need to be rebuilt based on an ABI/API incompatible chang
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Ideally, Koschei[0] should be doing this for us, right?
>
Neat, but kinda after the fact, right? I'm trying to be proactive and make
sure that all dependencies CAN rebuild against the new version (probably
using mockchain) before doing a build
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151012:
Workstation disk raw armhfp
No images in Rawhide 20151012 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 24 of 52
ID: 5670Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs@uefi
ID: 5657Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 56
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151012:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Soas disk raw armhfp
Server disk raw armhfp
No images in 23 Branched 20151012 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 52
ID: 5681Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap@uefi
ID: 5676
A couple of things:
* systemd in aarch64 crashes on boot:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271387
* On x86_64, ssh logins take quite a long time - about 30 seconds. I
have no idea what component to assign this to, so I didn't file a
bug about it yet.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:58:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * On x86_64, ssh logins take quite a long time - about 30 seconds. I
> have no idea what component to assign this to, so I didn't file a
> bug about it yet.
Not just logins, 'sudo bash' too.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtu
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:11:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:58:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * On x86_64, ssh logins take quite a long time - about 30 seconds. I
> > have no idea what component to assign this to, so I didn't file a
> > bug about
Maybe strace will show where it gets hung up?
---
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:00:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Maybe strace will show where it gets hung up?
Tried it of course - strace doesn't work across the setuid boundary.
Maybe I can attach a trace tool (which?) to sshd (how?) and find out
where it is spending its time. This stuff should
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:58:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * On x86_64, ssh logins take quite a long time - about 30 seconds. I
> have no idea what component to assign this to, so I didn't file a
> bug about it yet.
Is it DNS? That's my go-to blame victim for ssh delays.
--
Matth
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:16:17PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:58:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * On x86_64, ssh logins take quite a long time - about 30 seconds. I
> > have no idea what component to assign this to, so I didn't file a
> > bug about it
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Is it DNS? That's my go-to blame victim for ssh delays.
> I think it's dbus actually:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271394#c3
Is kdbus enabled?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
19844 22:16:16.857460 ppoll([{fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 1, {24,
999885000}, NULL, 8) = 0 (Timeout)
19844 22:16:41.864999
open("/usr/share/locale/en_GB.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
That's a huge gap while nothing at all is showing up in the strace.
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 11:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:50:31PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andreas Tunek > .com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, you have to do a lot of quite complicated stuff before you
> > > can
> > > register a
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > Is it DNS? That's my go-to blame victim for ssh delays.
>> I think it's dbus actually:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271394#c3
>
> Is kdbus enabled?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:21:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> > Is it DNS? That's my go-to blame victim for ssh delays.
>>> I think it's dbus actually:
>>> https://bugzilla
On 14.10.2015 00:13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:00:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Maybe strace will show where it gets hung up?
Tried it of course - strace doesn't work across the setuid boundary.
Maybe I can attach a trace tool (which?) to sshd (how?) and find out
Hi there,
I would like to announce that I'm willing to take ownership of the
following orphaned packages that are part of the Fedora Electronic Lab,
maintain and update it as required.
archimedes
covered
electric
emacs-verilog-mode
fped
freehdl
gds2pov
geda-gaf
gerbv
iverilog
keurocalc
kmenu-gnom
Hi
I need reviews this packages for upgrade ApacheDS to 2.0.0-M20.
apached/s-ldap-api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255815
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
Thanks in advance
gil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-10-14 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 9 (TC9) is now available
for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing!
This one contains the installer images that were missing from TC6,
though the Docker image is missing, releng says. openQA is grinding
away now, the first few te
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
group it would be nice to ship a system that could be targeted by
ansible out of the box. Unfortunately, since ansible uses python 2.X
vs python 3 it d
On 10/13/2015 08:21 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
group it would be nice to ship a system that could be targeted by
ansible out of the box. Unfortunately, sin
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:36:39 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 08:21 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
> > use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
> > group it would be nice
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 20:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 21:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > I don't see how that could work. Ansible has tons of modules, which
> > ones are "standard" ? Such a package would have a ton of deps...
>
> Right. Sometimes you need the Docke
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 21:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I don't see how that could work. Ansible has tons of modules, which
> ones are "standard" ? Such a package would have a ton of deps...
Right. Sometimes you need the Docker bits, sometimes you don't.
One thing that's a bit awkward is that y
45 matches
Mail list logo
