On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:58:26 +0200
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> In chrony 2.2-pre1 was added support for system call filtering with
> the kernel seccomp facility. In chrony it's mainly useful to reduce
> the damage from attackers who can execute arbitrary code, e.g. prevent
> gaining the root privile
Compose started at Wed Oct 7 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
Compose started at Wed Oct 7 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:24:22AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:58:26 +0200
> Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> > In chrony 2.2-pre1 was added support for system call filtering with
> > the kernel seccomp facility. In chrony it's mainly useful to reduce
> > the damage from attackers
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:36 +0200
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:24:22AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:58:26 +0200
> > Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >
> > > In chrony 2.2-pre1 was added support for system call filtering
> > > with the kernel seccomp facilit
Hi,
I was asked to follow "This SCM request method has been deprecated.
Please see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests"; on one of my
new package review bug.
I want to know is this process announced somewhere? This has been
asked on review bug also but as limb never gets c
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:23:01 +0530
Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>I was asked to follow "This SCM request method has been deprecated.
> Please see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests"; on one of my
> new package review bug.
>I want to know is this process announced somewh
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:23:01 +0530
> Parag Nemade wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>I was asked to follow "This SCM request method has been deprecated.
>> Please see
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests"; on one of my
>> new packa
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:33:38 +0530
Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
> I just used pkgdb and requested new package branches. Here I would
> like to suggest when someone requests branches associated with some
> review bug then that bug should get notification that "your request
> for branches has been subm
Hi,
My name is Dave Olsthoorn and a week ago i submitted my first pacakge
review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
I have been using linux for a couple of years now and this is my first
package that I have made on any system. I hope it is good enough.
Happy to answer a
On Wed Oct 7 18:06:47 2015 GMT+0200, dave olsthoorn wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> My name is Dave Olsthoorn and a week ago i submitted my first pacakge
> review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
>
> I have been using linux for a couple of years now and this is my first
> package
Hello!
I would like to become a Fedora package maintainer. I've long been a
proponent of Free Software, and have been a Fedora user for about three
years now (Gentoo before that, and Red Hat before that). I work at Red
Hat as a contributor to the Pulp project:
http://pulp.readthedocs.org/
I've b
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151006
No images in Rawhide 20151006 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 50 of 52
ID: 5017Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install@uefi
ID: 5016Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install
ID: 5015
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151006
No images in 23 Branched 20151006 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 9 of 52
ID: 4963Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 4962Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 4961Test: x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-10-07)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:47 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-10-07/fesco.2
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-10-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-10-08 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-10-08 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-10-08 1
Per this fesco ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point of
contact:
LabPlot -- Data Analysis and Visualization ( master f23 f22 f21 )
alliance -- VLSI EDA System ( el6 el5 )
archimedes -- 2D Quantum Monte Carlo
I built cmake 3.4.0-rc1 in Fedora rawhide last night. koschei has already
reported that it has caused build failures with plplot and paraview. Let me
know if you see any other cmake projects starting to fail to build.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NW
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per this fesco ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
>
> I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point of
> contact:
>
> gresistor -- Gnome resistor color code calculator ( master f23 f22 f21 el6
>
I just asked for an unretirement of aeskulap [1]
It was retired because of dependency-problems before F22.
I fixed these problems and also a crash I found some times ago.
I just filed a (re-)review request on bugzilla [2].
I came in touch with aeskulap when searching for a tool to look into
dvd's
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:03:07PM +0200, Jens Lody wrote:
> I just filed a (re-)review request on bugzilla [2].
The re-review needs to be done by a fellow packager until the
unretirement can happen.
> I don't know exactly howto proceed now.
> I opened the mentioned review, clicked the "Ask unre
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
I got admission into some British university and I am to buy a laptop .
wish to know a machine which is good with Linux . any advice on which and
where to get it please !
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Cond
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
> (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
> * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallaghs
> proposal without the critpath distinction (nirik, 18:43:49)
> * AGREED: Adjust the packaging pol
On 7 October 2015 at 16:09, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Extra points if we can put this in as an RPM header and you can have a
>> plugin which says "I only want N point packages"
>
> How does that help? It will just mean the user will never get the packages
> because nobod
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Extra points if we can put this in as an RPM header and you can have a
> plugin which says "I only want N point packages"
How does that help? It will just mean the user will never get the packages
because nobody will bother reducing the "points" if there is no policy
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On 10/05/2015 08:42 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 04:46 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 30.9.2015 v 00:17 Cole Robinson napsal(a):
>>> I'm hitting scriplet errors when trying to build f23 qemu in mock on an up
>>> to
>>> date f23 host. Example:
>>>
>>> $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> So the next step after that is that we reward people who lower a
> package's point. Good idea Kevin.
"Reward" how?
There shouldn't be any need for special rewards for a packager just doing
his/her job, instead, those who don't do it shouldn't be allowed to be
packa
On 7 October 2015 at 16:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> So the next step after that is that we reward people who lower a
>> package's point. Good idea Kevin.
>
> "Reward" how?
>
I was thinking of cookies, but I expect that some sort of system could
be put in place that wo
El 07/10/2015 2:05 pm, Kevin Fenzi escribió:
xcircuit -- Electronic circuit schematic drawing program ( master f23
f22 f21 el6 el5 )
Taken.
Eduardo
--
http://about.me/mayorgatellez
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
On 10/07/2015 11:21 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 October 2015 at 16:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>So the next step after that is that we reward people who lower a
>>package's point. Good idea Kevin.
>
>"Reward" how?
>
I was thinking of cookies, but I expect
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> Badges was supposed to be that carrot for the mule's so perhaps there's
> just missing new set of badges for this...
>
> 1.https://badges.fedoraproject.org/
Those "badges" are completely useless as a reward. They're just a
nonsensical entry on some website that I d
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I think this strikes a fair balance between promoting packaging hygiene
> and recognizing that not all upstream communities feel the same way Fedora
> packagers do about bundled libraries.
The thing is, it should NOT matter at all how upstream feels. If we treat
unbundling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2015 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per this fesco ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
>
> I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point
> of contact:
>
> LabPlot -- Data Analysis and Visua
On 07/10/15 20:33, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jared K. Smith wrote:
I think this strikes a fair balance between promoting packaging hygiene
and recognizing that not all upstream communities feel the same way Fedora
packagers do about bundled libraries.
The thing is, it should NOT matter at all how up
On Qua, 2015-10-07 at 21:21 -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Per this fesco ticket:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
> >
> > I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point
> > of contact:
> >
> > LabPlot
Hey folks! Just a quick heads-up that we'll be having a Cinnamon Test
Day today/tomorrow, Thursday Oct 8th. The wiki page is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-10-08_Cinnamon
As usual, folks will be hanging out in #fedora-test-day on Freenode
IRC. The Cinnamon live spin maintainer
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > I think this strikes a fair balance between promoting packaging hygiene
> > and recognizing that not all upstream communities feel the same way
> Fedora
> > packagers do about bundled libraries.
>
> The thing is, it s
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package
> or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, ot
Dne 8.10.2015 v 00:06 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
>> (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
>> * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallaghs
>> proposal without the critpath distinction (nir
WG meeting should be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* ??? do we have anything we want to talk about?
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 10/08/2015 07:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending pa
43 matches
Mail list logo
