Dne 30.9.2015 v 16:52 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> On 09/30/2015 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
>>> On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Yes, I also see this as a good compromise.
We then have the ability to at least track b
Compose started at Fri Oct 2 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining packages
still using it I could find in rawhide:
xbae
mesa-libGLw
ski
Inventor
grass
If anyone knows of other packages using it, please let me know and I ca
On Pá, 2015-10-02 at 13:18 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 30.9.2015 v 16:52 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> >
> > Like I've said many times before, I feel Fedora needs a serious
> > vulnerability in a widespread bundled or static library, such that
> > people finally comprehend the harm of bundling.
>
On 02.10.2015 13:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining
packages still using it I could find in rawhide:
xbae
mesa-libGLw
ski
Inventor
grass
If anyone knows of other packa
On 02.10.2015 13:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining
packages still using it I could find in rawhide:
xbae
mesa-libGLw
ski
Inventor
grass
An additional pkg is "grace"
Compose started at Fri Oct 2 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
On 10/02/2015 01:18 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.9.2015 v 16:52 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
Like I've said many times before, I feel Fedora needs a serious
vulnerability in a widespread bundled or static library, such that
people finally comprehend the harm of bundling.
This harms Fedora but no
On 10/02/2015 01:46 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Pá, 2015-10-02 at 13:18 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.9.2015 v 16:52 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
Like I've said many times before, I feel Fedora needs a serious
vulnerability in a widespread bundled or static library, such that
people finally compr
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Joachim Backes <
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote:
> On 02.10.2015 13:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
>> it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining
>> packages still usin
On 10/02/2015 01:33 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining
packages still using it I could find in rawhide:
Inventor
[Inventor maintainer speaking]
Migrating Inventor t
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Joachim Backes <
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote:
> On 02.10.2015 13:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
>> it's probably time to retire lesstif. I've migrated the remaining
>> packages still usin
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:19:19PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> only for projects where upstream is fully active and cares about the
>> security vulnerabilities in the bundled copies of software well.
> Correct. That's one of the criteria, FPC is trying to consider when
> granting bundling excep
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:11:46PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >This harms Fedora but not the upstream project which bundles.
> Exactly. This "bundling everything" is upstream-centric. It's
> convenient to them, but it's harmful to wider system integration.
Toshio explained one time that Fedora
On 02/10/15 15:22, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:19:19PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
only for projects where upstream is fully active and cares about the
security vulnerabilities in the bundled copies of software well.
Correct. That's one of the criteria, FPC is trying to co
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> (To be clear, I personally am in favor of also allowing more relaxed
> bundling for smaller projects which are on the fringes of the system
> integration you discuss. In other words, vastly expanding the "too
> small to care" exception.)
T
2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede :
> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>
>> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>>
>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
>> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
>> t
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151001
No images in 23 Branched 20151001 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 52
ID: 4462Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 4461Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 4458Test:
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151001
No images in Rawhide 20151001 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 49 of 52
ID: 4522Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty@uefi
ID: 4521Test: x86_64 universal server_simple_free_space@uefi
ID: 4520
On 10/02/2015 07:11 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2015-09-26 0:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede :
>> On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>
>>> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>>>
>>> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
>>> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.
Hello,
My name is Stuart Campbell, and I've just submitted my first package
review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380).
I have been a user of Red Hat / Fedora for quite a while (probably since
Red Hat Linux 6 ish times) and have done a fair amount of packaging for
variou
On 10/02/2015 02:33 PM, Stuart Campbell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Stuart Campbell, and I've just submitted my first package
> review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380).
>
> I have been a user of Red Hat / Fedora for quite a while (probably since
> Red Hat Linux 6 i
I met the exact same problem.
-robin
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> I'm hitting scriplet errors when trying to build f23 qemu in mock on an up
> to
> date f23 host. Example:
>
> $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --init
> ...
> $ mock --root fedora-23-x86_64 --rebuild qemu
23 matches
Mail list logo
