On July 29, 2015 2:06:52 PM PDT, "Richard W.M. Jones" <
rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:57AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > ocaml
>
> The comps.xml group for ocaml is pretty weird. It has some mandatory
> base packages, which are OK-ish (although there are some notable on
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 11:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> this thread, comps has things such as the (still mysterious to me)
> environment groups,
Environment groups are, quite simply, groups of groups. That's the
entirety of the matter. They have a 'grouplist' of member groups that
are basical
# dnf upgrade
(dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing any
packages)
dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits without
doing any installing
dnf all deletes downloaded packages
# dnf upgrade (package subset, e.g. dnf* rpm* a* b* c* d* e* f* x*
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 03:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> # dnf upgrade
> (dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before
> installing any
> packages)
> dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits
> without
> doing any installing
> dnf all deletes downloaded pac
Johnny Robeson composed on 2015-07-30 03:25 (UTC-0400):
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 03:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> # dnf upgrade
>> (dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing
>> any packages)
>> dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits with
On 07/29/2015 11:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:36:07AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Secondly, it would be excellent if someone could commit to spinning
test ISOs when requested. Turn around time on bugs like this are
- Original Message -
> From: "Felix Miata"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:21:19 AM
> Subject: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited
>
> # dnf upgrade
> (dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing a
Dne 29.7.2015 v 19:42 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:53:27 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
>> "The Emacs add-on packaging guidelines no longer stipulate that packages
>> which
>> also bundle support for Emacs should split out those Emacs files into
>> separate
>> sub-packages.
>> Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error:
>>
>> Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>>
>> For instance see the build log
>> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-k
>> de-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc
Florian Festi wrote:
> Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators [1].
> Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats
> what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
> * AND OR IF ELSE
> * & | ? :
> * && || ? :
> But the final release will
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi
> wrote:
> > Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators
> > [1]. Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging
> > formats what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
> > * AND OR I
Michael Schroeder wrote:
> And there's IF and THEN/ELSE. IF is a postfix op, like in perl
> and ruby:
>
> Requires: a IF b
There's no ELSE part in this variant?
> THEN/ELSE is the infix one:
>
> Requires: b THEN a
> Requires: b ? a
> Requires: b THEN a ELSE c
> Requires: b ? a : c
"THEN" witho
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:18:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Actually what is the point of following?
>
> ```
> Case II
>
> Where a package's principal functionality does not require (X)Emacs, but
> the package also includes some auxiliary Elisp files to provide support
> for the package in (X)Emacs
On 30 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:18:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Actually what is the point of following?
>>
>> ```
>> Case II
>>
>> Where a package's principal functionality does not require (X)Emacs, but
>> the package also includes some auxiliary E
Dne 30.7.2015 v 12:27 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:18:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Actually what is the point of following?
>>
>> ```
>> Case II
>>
>> Where a package's principal functionality does not require (X)Emacs, but
>> the package also includes some auxiliary El
Dne 30.7.2015 v 12:39 Jonathan Underwood napsal(a):
> On 30 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:18:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> Actually what is the point of following?
>>>
>>> ```
>>> Case II
>>>
>>> Where a package's principal functionality does not requi
On 30 July 2015 at 11:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
[snip]
> These are definitely fair points, but at the end, this should be left up
> to the maintainer if there will be -emacs package and the general
> preference should be to support the subpackages. I hope it will give as
> greater opportunities with
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:39:00 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> If there's a general consensus that we want
> to switch back to the splitting out of emacs sub-packages, I would
> definitely support that initiative. But I think (and I'm not speaking
> for them) the FPC would want to see good reason
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:02:05 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 11:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> [snip]
> > These are definitely fair points, but at the end, this should be left up
> > to the maintainer if there will be -emacs package and the general
> > preference should be to supp
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:43:15 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I read that, but there is no really explained why it should not be
> subpackage. Moreover, I am not sure if you support my point or you are
> against :)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/212924.html
--
devel mailing
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:05:13 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> As much as I like a "minimal installation" as a base core for spins and
> other products, I'm a much bigger fan of fewer and bigger packages instead
> of confronting and overwhelming distribution users with thousands of packages.
> You
Compose started at Thu Jul 30 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
Il 30/07/2015 13:45, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, please revert tese changes!
deltaspike http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1008414
Compose started at Thu Jul 30 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:ju
Il 30/07/2015 14:42, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, please revert these changes!
deltaspike http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1008414
Hi,
I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora 23
and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions removed,
some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
Packages which needs rebuild (probably patches or updates needed):
* gitg
* gnome-builder
*
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
Rawhide system adding "kdbus=1" to your kernel command line is hence
everything you need to
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
> Rawhide system addi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> For folks not keen to jump headfirst into Rawhide, is it expected that
> this should work on Fedora 23 or Fedora 22 if one installs only the
> kernel and systemd packages from Rawhide? That might make people more
> comfortable trying it
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
>> with built-in support
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>>> added it to the Rawhide kern
Hello Andrew,
Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Development discussions
related to Fedora and your mail Id devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt
even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my em
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 09:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> AFAICT, so far, it seems to boot (and work) without any apparent
> immediate issues. So, my wild guess would be on an iso/boot-image
> composition or tooling issue.
No. It's clearly a kernel bug. It's just that it happens to be in code
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
> Rawhide system addi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK, I spun up a Fedora Server 23 Alpha TC2 system and installed the
> Rawhide kernel, then rebooted with kdbus=1
>
> I then tried to run 'rolectl list roles', which returned "Rolekit is
> not running". So it failed to provide D-B
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 18:50 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > OK, I spun up a Fedora Server 23 Alpha TC2 system and installed the
> > Rawhide kernel, then rebooted with kdbus=1
> >
> > I then tried to run 'rolectl lis
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:28:03 +0200
gil wrote:
> Il 30/07/2015 13:45, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto:
> > Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
> > Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
> why these was removed?
> they are already built for F23, please revert tese changes!
> deltaspike
Il 30/07/2015 22:30, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:28:03 +0200
gil wrote:
Il 30/07/2015 13:45, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, pl
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
> Rawhide system adding "kdbus=1
On 07/30/2015 04:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
>> with built-in support, too now. If you are r
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
>> with built-in support, too now. If
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> I take Gnumeric and Emacs, but all other ones are in-Gnome
> projects, aren't they (at least having repository in
> git.gnome.org)?
Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office, so it is also under the GNOME umbrella
these days.
The thing is that GTK+ 3 is becoming more and more useless
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing
> atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some
> sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;(
So this useless "Fedora Atomic" toy now delayed updates (including security
updates!) f
Jiří Konečný wrote:
> I have a theoretical question. Is it possible to a create package to
> Fedora which is using oauth2 authentication and that means there are
> app_id and secret_code strings generated by api provider? These strings
> are used in the program but can't be shipped in the code beca
Radek Holy wrote:
> Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
> fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even
after a successful update/install, deleting the cached packages is a major
data loss because it prevents do
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > scantailor
>
> This has some weird CMake error about being unable to figure out how
> to use -pthread.
This one boiled down to crappy upstream build scripts which disregard
the provided CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS values:
https://github.co
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing
> > atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still
> > some
> > sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;(
>
> So this useless
User over on users@ list reports booting Fedora 22 Workstation (live
media), and doing:
# dnf install "Developer Tools"
Implodes.
I've reproduced the problem, and the gist is that there's a dm
snapshot that's too small for this task, it gets full quickly, the
file system face plants, and the ker
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 21:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> User over on users@ list reports booting Fedora 22 Workstation (live
> media), and doing:
>
> # dnf install "Developer Tools"
>
> Implodes.
>
> I've reproduced the problem, and the gist is that there's a dm
> snapshot that's too small for
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:54:18PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Heya!
> >
> > I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
> > added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
> > with built-in suppor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Radek Holy wrote:
> > Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
> > fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
>
> I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even
> after a successful update/install,
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 15:58 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora
> 23
> and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions
> removed,
> some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
I believe you'll wan
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:58:09PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora 23
> and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions removed,
> some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
>
> Packages which n
On 30.07.2015 20:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
>> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
>> with built-in support, too now. If
56 matches
Mail list logo
