Re: Investigation of the F23 mass rebuild

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Since the change was > done by changing the rpm build macros, I think we can conclude that the > build macros aren't being applied. Granted, packages can disable the > hardened build macros, but the packages I've called out above aren't >

rawhide report: 20150706 changes

Compose started at Mon Jul 6 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [airsched] airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)

Re: DisabledRepos and Software Center

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I have question about > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport > > We (as Copr developers) are thinking about one RFE. We would like to > create package which would contains .repo files and gpg keys for every > Copr project. All of them with > enabl

Re: DisabledRepos and Software Center

Rex Dieter wrote: > since there is no QA (e.g. some copr Sorry for the half-thought here, meant to explicitly mention that some coprs or good (high-quality, well-maintained, etc...), while others are... less so. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: Investigation of the F23 mass rebuild

On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 21:12 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Thank you for this great analysis. Do you still have the executable > files and can run checksec on them and publish the output somewhere? You got it: https://ajax.fedorapeople.org/f23-checksec-scan - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.f

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 1 packages were orphaned perl-qpid [f21, f20] was orphaned by irina Perl bindings for the Qpid messaging framework https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl

Re: Docker base image naming for non-x86_64

On 06/02/2015 08:32 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] > about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That > discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle the naming for > all of this. > > The current que

Planned Outage: fedorapeople.org - 2015-07-08 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage: fedorapeople.org - 2015-07-08 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-07-08 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-07-08 21:00

Firefox 39 and "restore session"

* Mo Jul 06 2015 Martin Stransky - 39.0-7 - Added a fix for rhbz#1240259 - Firefox 39 does not open home page but "restore session" well, does anobdy test things or are builds just fired out? no change in that context. don't get me wrong but i would except local tests before a build hits

Re: Firefox 39 and "restore session"

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:00:41 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > * Mo Jul 06 2015 Martin Stransky - 39.0-7 > - Added a fix for rhbz#1240259 - Firefox 39 does not open >home page but "restore session" > > well, does anobdy test things or are builds just fired out? > no change in that context. do

Re: Firefox 39 and "restore session"

Am 06.07.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:00:41 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: * Mo Jul 06 2015 Martin Stransky - 39.0-7 - Added a fix for rhbz#1240259 - Firefox 39 does not open home page but "restore session" well, does anobdy test things or are builds just fired

octave 4.0.0

I'm going to be building octave 4.0.0 to Rawhide soon. Everything that requires it will need to be rebuilt. I think this is: csdp-6.1.1-9.fc23.src.rpm lhapdf-5.9.1-9.fc23.src.rpm NLopt-2.4.2-3.fc22.src.rpm octave-audio-1.1.4-12.fc22.src.rpm octave-communications-1.2.0-2.fc22.src.rpm octave-contr

Re: Firefox 39 and "restore session"

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:18:13 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > well, if upstream FF39 with the sam eprofile as well as windows would > not suffer from the same problem Then it's something specific to the Fedora build. Upstream bundles things that the Fedora build unbundles, as well as likely us

Re: Docker base image naming for non-x86_64

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Pradipta Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On 06/02/2015 08:32 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > > Hello all, > > There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] > > about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That > > discussion lead down the tr

Re: Docker base image naming for non-x86_64

On 07/07/2015 06:09 AM, Jon wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Pradipta Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > > On 06/02/2015 08:32 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > > Hello all, > > There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] > > about get