(First time I've posted here, so a short self-introduction: I'm a
CPython core developer who recently switched from working on Red Hat
internal testing infrastructure to Fedora software package management.
As such, I'm quite familiar with a number of efforts aimed at making
various automated testin
Compose started at Sun Jul 5 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
On 04/07/15 03:08 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>> Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is
>> unresponsive.
> The patch has been attached less
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not
> sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters in the distribution,
> particularly since they are merging back together in the future.
>
> Would you be willing
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
> I think that as described, this change will cause more harm than good.
> As both an upstream and a packager of Cockpit I am against it in its
> current form.
Please note that this Change has already been implemented as approved
by FESCo for a
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> That doesn't really help, since the main advantage to this Change
> Proposal is having a single package to update when fixes are needed,
> but nearly all web applications take pieces of jQuery out and minify
> them (taking only the parts
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> If web client had a chance to say "hey, i have a /jquery.js in the
> cache from application A with checksum 'bla', I can reuse it for
> application B, since it request /jquery.js with the same checksum".
> Actually just checking checksums coul
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. I don't really
have anything urgent for the agenda.
If anyone can think of something urgent to discuss, please reply to
this mail and we can get together at the usual time (15:00 UTC in
#fedora-meeting).
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
Greetings fellow testers!
As we only have one blocker proposed, [0] I propose we cancel tomorrow's
blocker review meeting. Everyone can vote in ticket as their time allows.
If someone thinks it'd be better to have the meeting, please ping in IRC
and we'll go ahead and have the meeting.
Thanks!
[
