Compose started at Sun Jun 28 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-06-29
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again!
Let's check in on F23 status and the F23 Test Day process. If anyone
has
Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation where a
> project decides to use submodules in Git. The archive generated doesn't
> incorporate the submodule files.
I just generated a separate package for the submodule and added it as a
Source1 (which is unpa
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Seems like the easiest path would be to make sure all the astronomy
> packages land on the Science / KDE spin that already exists and do a
> lot of marketing / blogging / etc. to a targeted group of "citizen
> astronomers". For that matter, maybe their should be a re
A "Fedora for Citizen Scientists" spin may be confused with my spin in
development, Fedora Netizen, a portmanteau of internet and citizen. Suggest
sticking with Fedora Astronomy or as an alternative, Fedora Space, for
reducing any confusion between the two spins.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:38 PM,
On 28 June 2015 at 23:54, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>> Seems like the easiest path would be to make sure all the astronomy
>> packages land on the Science / KDE spin that already exists and do a
>> lot of marketing / blogging / etc. to a targeted group of "citizen
>> astr
Hi, guys and gals,
I am currently running the FEL spin of f20. I am going to upgrade to a
later version, probably F22, by the save users and reformat process.
However in the rush to cloud/workstation, FEL spin no longer appears
anywhere at this time. I currently have listed all the progra
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 07:04:44PM -0700, Les Howell wrote:
> I am currently running the FEL spin of f20. I am going to upgrade to a
> later version, probably F22, by the save users and reformat process.
> However in the rush to cloud/workstation, FEL spin no longer appears
> anywhere at thi
I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for
stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a "best practice" for this
sort of thing?
The main question I have is:
Is it "better" to use a single repo and continue to update it with the
latest release?
Or is it better to have
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> On 28 June 2015 at 23:54, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>>> Seems like the easiest path would be to make sure all the astronomy
>>> packages land on the Science / KDE spin that already exists and do a
>>> lot of m
Dne 29.6.2015 v 06:13 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
> I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for
> stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a
> "best practice" for this sort of thing?
>
> The main question I have is:
> Is it "better" to use a single repo and continue t
11 matches
Mail list logo
