On 11.6.2015 07:39, P J P wrote:
>Hello Miloslav,
>
>> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 8:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> We’ve had earlier conversations about whether the resolver being used (local,
>> remote, container host) is trusted to perform DNSSEC validation. How is this
>> resolved? The Ch
- Original Message -
> From: "Colin Walters"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:15:27 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015, at 08:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >
> > * Python 3 is the only Python impl
- Original Message -
> From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:05:41 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Python 3 as Default
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:50:14AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wide
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 04:01 AM, Robert Kuska wrote:
> Does it mean that Ansible is shipped by default with Atomic host?
>
> We were working with data provided by
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-atomic.git
> and there is no ansible listed within packages.
Ansible is agentless, you
= Proposed System Wide Change: SELinux policy store migration =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinuxPolicyStoreMigration
Change owner(s):
* Petr Lautrbach
* Miroslav Grepl
The newest SELinux userspace project release 2015-02-02 includes a change of
the location of the SELinux policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
a new version of storaged [1] is now available at [2]. Rawhide
packages have already been built.
The most significant feature of this release is: iSCSI initiator
configuration API.
Detailed list of changes since the first release:
- - intr
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 06:51 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: SELinux policy store migration =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinuxPolicyStoreMigration
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Petr Lautrbach
> * Miroslav Grepl
>
> The newest SELinux userspace project release
- Original Message -
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 04:01 AM, Robert Kuska wrote:
>
> > Does it mean that Ansible is shipped by default with Atomic host?
> >
> > We were working with data provided by
> > https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-atomic.git
> > and there is no ansible list
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 09:03 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> Which means that it isn't *in* the Atomic host itself, but it is only used to
> *control instances* of Atomic host, is that correct? If so, I see no conflict
> with the proposed change.
It's not a conflict. I'm just making the poin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:51:52AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> In the SELinux userspace project release 2015-02-02, the SELinux
> policy store was moved from /etc/selinux//modules/ to
> /var/lib/selinux//.
The change page notes performance improvements. Can these be
quantified? At the very least, th
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 09:03 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> >
> > Which means that it isn't *in* the Atomic host itself, but it is only used
> > to *control instances* of Atomic host, is that correct? If so, I see no
> > conflict with the proposed change.
>
> It'
Compose started at Thu Jun 11 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ambari]
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jerse
On 06/11/2015 02:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
>> The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the
>> exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to
>> define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its de
Dne 11.6.2015 v 14:42 Colin Walters napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 06:51 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: SELinux policy store migration =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinuxPolicyStoreMigration
>>
>> Change owner(s):
>> * Petr Lautrbach
>> * Miroslav Gre
In Peru i have the same problem, my ISP is implememtating NAT 3 in its
networks and i found more dnf hangs in some networks with NAT 3, but when i
try use dnf in other ISP network dnf works perfectly, the degmbug results
say some thing like "banned client by web server" but i not remember
exactly.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 09:30 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Could you please be more specific with your answers? What does *there* mean?
there = Atomic Host
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://f
Hello,
Investigating bug #1230838, I noticed that when installing mmg3d-libs,
dnf installs Konsole output ptscotch-mpich, whereas yum-deprecated
installs scotch. Both scotch and ptscotch-mpich provide the required
libscotch.so.0()(64bit), albeit one in /usr/lib64/ and the other one in
/usr/l
On 06/11/2015 03:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:51:52AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> In the SELinux userspace project release 2015-02-02, the SELinux
>> policy store was moved from /etc/selinux//modules/ to
>> /var/lib/selinux//.
>
> The change page notes performance impro
c2567036ca2018b89d5a14a6ee5d0661 Server-Starter-0.29.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Server-Starter/Server-Starter-0.29.tar.gz/md5/c2567036ca2018b89d5a14a6ee5d0661/Server-Starter-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/P
From 63fce7b707717127211fab320b0debeac6e83407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:20:44 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 511cac3..d9b69ab 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Server
This fixes a regression from ticket 512
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47921
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47921/0001-Ticket-47921-indirect-cos-does-not-reflect-changes-i.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
84a10a9f48caf74292a1acb8b4365344 Server-Starter-0.30.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Server-Starter/Server-Starter-0.30.tar.gz/md5/84a10a9f48caf74292a1acb8b4365344/Server-Starter-0.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/P
From 60436178639228edd317a80c64d40800d49290ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?=
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:33:51 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d9b69ab..69b41d4 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Server
Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
> I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers
> of Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4.
The Qt4 one was just a hack (for qt-creator).
> Also I've checked specs of
> some packages like qt5-qtdeclarative which uses private headers dur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230828
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-06-11)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 17:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-06-11/env-and-stacks.2015-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229932
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|perl-C
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1145
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
210
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
61
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1145
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
600
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
364
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
210
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
94
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
77
https://admin.fedora
On 05/28/2015 07:51 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Dear EPEL,
Just got word that Fedora switched to Wine-staging:
https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=23535
"The Fedora "wine" packages are now being built from
wine-staging (formerly known as wine-compholio), a
heavily p
93c50b99d5476b6596ff24800a7b0c8a POE-Component-Client-Ping-1.174.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping/POE-Component-Client-Ping-1.174.tar.gz/md5/93c50b99d5476b6596ff24800a7b0c8a/POE-Component-Client-Ping-1.174.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 390ece88d1a1a831096ac6aa3dd9e6b2460c54a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jehane
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:38:34 +0200
Subject: new version
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6174790..fd18357 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/POE-Component-Client-Ping-1.171.tar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230077
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie ---
I don't use Perl much and I don't use the package that I initially packaged
this for, so if someone wants to take it over on the Fedora side I'd be
grateful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
Inching closer to the goal of adding the GAP HAP package to Fedora for
sagemath to use, I need a couple more reviews. The first is an
external dependency needed by a forthcoming GAP package [1]. The
second is yet another of the noarch GAP packages that are made to be
simply unpacked in the main G
dfateyev set the monitor flag of perl-DBIx-RunSQL to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On 06/11/2015 09:01 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
So, whose fault is this? Packaging of dnf? Nothing relevant for this
caught my eye skimming through the packaging guidelines.
I think this is dnf's fault. YUm didn't have the same problem, since if
multiple packages provided the necessary library, yum
dfateyev set the monitor flag of perl-DBIx-Connector to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
dfateyev set the monitor flag of perl-Data-Faker to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230570
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.13-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.13-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
dfateyev set the monitor flag of perl-enum to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230570
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.13-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.13-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 09:30 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
>> Could you please be more specific with your answers? What does *there* mean?
>
> there = Atomic Host
I think the point that Colin is trying to make is that while Atomic
Host doe
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
> > mostly due to lack of time for the various parties to sit down and
> > plan and then program this furt
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> I think the point that Colin is trying to make is that while Atomic
> Host does not depend on Ansible being installed, it is a very popular
> utility used to remotely manage (potentially large) sets of Atomic
> Hosts.
Right, see
https://gith
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> > decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
>> > mostly due to lack of time for the various
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Technically yes.
>
> Politically no.
>
> As stated in refered blog entry:
>
> http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2015/05/20/why_mock_does_not_work_on_el_6_and_el7_and_how_to_fix_it/index.html
> I decided to go with 3rd option. And you must manually acknowledge that
Hello,
is there a JavaScript SIG or a mailing list? I've been forced to package
several JavaScript code/libraries and I have some questions.
However, I couldn't find any trace of a JavaScript SIG or a mailing
list. Is there anyone interested in creating/joining one?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora ht
11.06.2015, 10:01, "Rex Dieter" :
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers
>> of Qt 5 in Fedora but there is one for Qt 4.
>
> The Qt4 one was just a hack (for qt-creator).
The issue is that right now private headers are instal
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
Unfortunately the Proposal doesn't say anything about how this will
actually work, which is something NetworkManager needs to know. It also
fails to address the failure cases where your local DNS doesn't support
DNSSEC or is otherwise broken here out of
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>
> > I think the point that Colin is trying to make is that while Atomic
> > Host does not depend on Ansible being installed, it is a very popular
> > utility used to remotely manage (potentially large) sets of A
On 2015-06-11, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Otherwise build-essentials will get cargo-culted into every spec file
> and we're back to a defined buildroot standard based on build-essentials
> which will grow over the years. All the things RCM wanted to avoid.
>
I fully agree with this paragraph.
-- Pe
54 matches
Mail list logo
