On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 08:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > and
> > here is what stuck to my mind. Others are of course welcome to add
> >
> > what
> > I have forgotten and to correct me when I a wrong.
> >
> > To start, we'd like to have an automated way to check the ABI
> > compatib
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos a écrit:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 08:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> >
>> > and
>> > here is what stuck to my mind. Others are of course welcome to add
>> >
>> > what
>> > I have forgotten and to correct me when I a wrong.
>> >
>> > To start, we'd like to have
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:39 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Of course, nobody likes ABI *breakage*. And I agree that if all ABI
> breakage could be detected automatically, ABI breakages would never
> make
> it into stable releases.
> The thing is, the tool detects ABI *changes*. Some changes are
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:39 +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Of course, nobody likes ABI *breakage*. And I agree that if all ABI
breakage could be detected automatically, ABI breakages would never
make
it into stable releases.
The thing is, the t
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:53 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > I have not seen the output of abicheck (I use abi-compliance
> > -checker
> > personally but I guess abidiff is as good). However, I'm not sure
> > about
> > which changes which are not breakages you mean? I'm not aware of
> > ABI
>
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos a écrit:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:53 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
>> > I have not seen the output of abicheck (I use abi-compliance
>> > -checker
>> > personally but I guess abidiff is as good). However, I'm not sure
>> > about
>> > which changes which are not brea
Compose started at Mon Jun 8 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ambari]
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jerse
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
[...]
>> I have not seen the output of abicheck (I use abi-compliance-checker
>> personally but I guess abidiff is as good).
It's abidiff :-)
>> However, I'm not sure about which changes which are not breakages you
>> mean? I'm not aware of
On 2015-06-05, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> The nature of programs written in these dynamic languages makes it quite
> hard to compare types used in the API entry points of a library
Pedantic note: There is difference between dynamic vs. static languages
and dynamically vs. statically typed languages.
On 08.06.2015 12:37, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-06-05, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> The nature of programs written in these dynamic languages makes it quite
>> hard to compare types used in the API entry points of a library
>
> Pedantic note: There is difference between dynamic vs. static languages
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:19 Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Having keywords makes the search functionality much
> > > better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown
> > > in the software center.
> > What would
A new version of SWI Prologue pl-7.2.0-1.fc23 brought a new code and new
licenses. For your information the license of `pl' package was changed from
(GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0) and (GPLv2+ with exceptions) and
LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and UCD and BSD and Public Domain and EPL and GPLv2 and
= Proposed System Wide Change: Boost 1.59 Uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F23Boost159
Change owner(s): Jon Wakely
This change brings Boost 1.58.0 or later to Fedora 23. We generally aim to ship
1.59.0, as that seems likely to make it (hence the Change name), but 1.58.0 is
out
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Will Woods wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 07:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Uhh, this might be a stupid question, but what actually prevents us
>> from integrating the FedUp process into install media (that is, not
>> live images)? I mean, yeah, it's nice that we ca
Dne 29.5.2015 v 13:38 Petr Hracek napsal(a):
> Please have a look on Feature proposed in Fedora 19.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraUpgrade
> It should be redesigned maybe. Package already exists in Fedora.
>
> What do you think about it?
It is still there. Just not marked as Feat
*IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two*
Agenda:
- Interview candidates for new memberships
- Optionally accept new members
- Status - Docker
- Status - BuildRequires
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
5 packages were orphaned
docx2txt [f22, f21] was orphaned by bochecha
Convert Docx documents to Text
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/docx2txt
jna [el5]
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Kurik"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 12:48:10 PM
> Subject: FESCo and Council elections in June 2015
>
> Greetings,
>
> FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're lo
Hello everyone!
The nomination period for FESCo, Council and Env and Stack Elections is now
open.
We will be selecting four seats on FESCo [1], one seat on Council [2] and five
seats on Env and Stacks [3]. If you are interested in these roles, please add
yourself to the lists of nominees (check
Planned Outage: Storage migration - 2015-06-09 23:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-06-09 23:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-06-09 23:
On 06/06/15 16:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
Hello all,
There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0]
about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That
discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle
On 08.06.2015 10:29, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> *IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two*
>
> Agenda:
> - Interview candidates for new memberships
> - Optionally accept new members
> - Status - Docker
> - Status - BuildRequires
> - Open Floor
>
> Please add items by replying to this mail
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:52:35PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +, John Florian wrote:
> >> Personally I do so using a scheme like /opt/$VENDOR/$PRODUCT/$RELEASE,
> >> but to my knowledge the F
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:45:20AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Ideally it would not only install those packages, but configure them to
> a default to privacy setup. Additionally making some other changes from
> default desktop settings to do that as well. This is something that
> could be done in t
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:18:12 +
Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:45:20AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Ideally it would not only install those packages, but configure
> > them to a default to privacy setup. Additionally making some other
> > changes from default desktop settings
On 8 June 2015 at 06:37, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Will Woods wrote:
>> On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 07:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> Uhh, this might be a stupid question, but what actually prevents us
>>> from integrating the FedUp process into install media (that is, not
>>
Dne 1.6.2015 v 14:03 Jan Kurik napsal(a):
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver
>
>
The "How To Test" section now contains a lot of steps such as "configure
NM", "enable/disable service", but when there wil
28 matches
Mail list logo
