Re: git perl-less build?

On 3.6.2015 15:35, Todd Zullinger wrote: Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote: On 3.6.2015 13:56, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: [...] What about adopting something similar to what has been done for the R package, There is R-core, R-java R-devel and R. If you yu

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-06-04)

WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston, 21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode. = Topics = * Elections and charter enhances * Council Engineering update (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000786.html) * Fedor

Re: git perl-less build?

2015-06-04 9:34 GMT+02:00 Petr Stodulka : > > > On 3.6.2015 15:35, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote: > > On 3.6.2015 13:56, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > [...] > > What about adopting something similar to what has been done for the

jplesnik pushed to perl-Image-Xbm (master). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From b08e0a0c43692036399ca4be1aa12374f1013d3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:57:02 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild diff --git a/perl-Image-Xbm.spec b/perl-Image-Xbm.spec index 311b876..e2bd6b4 100644 --- a/perl-Image-Xbm.spec +++ b/perl-Image-Xbm.spec @

Re: git perl-less build?

On 4.6.2015 09:56, Haïkel wrote: 2015-06-04 9:34 GMT+02:00 Petr Stodulka : On 3.6.2015 15:35, Todd Zullinger wrote: Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote: On 3.6.2015 13:56, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: [...] What about adopting something similar to what has

Re: Reviving Fedora MIPS

On 02.06.2015 o 12:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:10:17PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: >> Apart from mips64el, we have lately started working on 32-bit mipsel, to >> be ran on the Creator CI20 Borad [4]. This is basically 3 months behind >> mips64el so there are no signific

F23 Self Contained Change: System Firmware Updates

= Proposed Self Contained Change: System Firmware Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemFirmwareUpdates Change owner(s): * Peter Jones * Richard Hughes This change is to add the ability to perform firmware updates on UEFI machines. == Detailed Description == This adds the ab

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9943933&name=root.log&offset=-4000 DEBUG util.py:452: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources'] with env {'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM

rawhide report: 20150604 changes

Compose started at Thu Jun 4 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [OpenTK] OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0 OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0 OpenTK-1

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:27:52 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9943933&name=root.log&offset=-4000 > > > DEBUG util.py:452:

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:27:52 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi all, >> >> is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? >> https://

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9943933&name=root.log&offset=-4000 > > > DEBUG util.py:4

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi all, >> >> is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? >> htt

Re: Rapid release for security updates

Jared K. Smith wrote: > I completely disagree... the checks and balances that are in place are > there for a reason, and aren't too difficult to satisfy in the case of a > security update. Completely repealing the requirements would be a gross > overreaction. Introducing the requirements was the

Minutes from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-06-04)

== #fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-06-04) == Meeting started by hhorak at 11:59:32 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-06-04/env-and-stacks.2015-

Vim in F22 compiled without lua support

Hi, Vim in F22 is compiled without lua support - this implies that users cannot use vim plugins that depend on lua. There'a bug already filed for this here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203321 Could someone please build vim with lua support? Also, when lua support is disabled, ca

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

- Original Message - > On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in > > keywords from ? Or, going the > > other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize

Re: no product firewall-config in bugzilla?

- Original Message - > rpm -qf /usr/bin/firewall-config > firewall-config-0.3.13-7.fc22.noarch > > But I can't select firewall-config in BZ! You forgot the: rpm -qi firewall-config | grep "Source RPM" call which will show it's generated from the "firewalld" source RPM. > I filed my bug

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:47 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> is ther

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ > system tray > applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the > legacy > XEmbed-based system tray protocol that the builtin GTK+ classes > implement.) H

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ >> system tray >> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the > legacy >> XEmbed-based system

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 04:39:39PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Yes we found a bug in upload.cgi ( > >> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6191 ) and are working > >> on fixing this issue. > > > >> In the mean while, I have fixed your package, so bui

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:45:20AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'd like to add here that I personally like the idea around this spin, > but I would want it to live up to that idea. Just providing a > collection of privacy packages installed by default is great, but it's > not going to lead to a goo

Re: default btrfs partitioning setup

On 06/02/2015 06:08 AM, Neal Becker wrote: I have an older setup created by anaconda from 2013, and it looks like UUID=7246327b-1905-4fe2-9b6b-b9376017264f / btrfs subvolid=5,subvol=root00 0 0 UUID=2c04be93-34c1-4016-ba41-60fd9fd90616 /boot ext4 defaults

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:29:25 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:21:42PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > So, to be explicit: > > > > The spin description, and spin contents, need to be put in line, so > > that users installing the spin will get what they will expect to get >

Puppet 4

I've been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but haven't heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they've moved to an all-in-one packaging process that "includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4 and CFacter 0.4, the latest Hiera and Mcollective, as well Ruby 2.1.5, Ope

Re: Reviving Fedora MIPS

2015-06-02 7:19 GMT-03:00 Richard W.M. Jones : > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:10:17PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: >> Apart from mips64el, we have lately started working on 32-bit mipsel, to >> be ran on the Creator CI20 Borad [4]. This is basically 3 months behind >> mips64el so there are no significa

Re: Puppet 4

2015-06-04 20:21 GMT+02:00 John Florian : > I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but > haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to > an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4 and > CFacter 0.4, the latest

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 03:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> libappindicator is now (since Fedora 22) also REQUIRED for GTK+ >> system tray >> applets to work under KDE Plasma. (Plasma 5 no longer supports the > >> legacy XEmbed-based system tray protocol that the builtin G

Re: virt-manager - libappindicator-gtk3 - remmina

drago01 wrote: > The thing is we want to kill it but our designers didn't come up with > a suitable replacement "just use notifications" does not cover what > the app authors want so they stick to systray icons unfortunately. But > we should have this discussion upstream not here. The Status Notif

Re: Puppet 4

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Haïkel wrote: > 2015-06-04 20:21 GMT+02:00 John Florian : > > I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but > > haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve > moved to > > an all-in-one packaging process that “includ

Re: Puppet 4

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, John Florian wrote: > I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but > haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to > an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4 and > CFacter 0.4,

Re: fedora-easy-karma: InsecurePlatformWarning

On 28/04/15 21:17, Cole Robinson wrote: On 04/28/2015 01:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: i am not sure for which package file a bug Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F21)... /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/packages/urllib3/util/ssl_.py:90: InsecurePlatformWarnin