Re: DNF and mock

2015-03-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in mock. > I would like to share outcomes of this > meeting. > > First I would like to state that you can already optionally use DNF in your > mock by setting: > co

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

2015-03-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages > simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite > complicated. > > So far I've hit: > - GCC-5.0 > - "Hardening" > - boost upgrade > - ImageMagi

Reason why non-commiters are not allowed to create buildroot overrides?

2015-03-15 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi, Just wondering, is there a particular reason why non-commiters are not allowed to create buildroot overrides for a package? Reason for asking: I've got a package (openambit) which installs a file to Konsole output %{_libdir}/wireshark/plugins/%{wireshark_ver}/ambit.so This means, for eve

Orphaning grads

2015-03-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
I really don't remember how I became the POC for grads, but I don't have time to maintain it and I don't use it so I've orphaned it. Hopefully someone (perhaps deji who is a co-maintainer) will pick it up. - Orion -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2015-03-16 Fedora QA Meeting

2015-03-15 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting; I don't think we have any major topics to cover and we can sync on F22 status during the blocker review meeting. Does that sound OK? If anyone has any topics they wanted to discuss or issues to go over from last week or anything, please s

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

2015-03-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I'm the guy that brought up the XKCD comic. > > I did it first. ;-) > >> The classic >> storage is the Post-it note on the secretary's desk, but I see a lot >> of people who should know better writing them into sour

Update to 0ad-0.18

2015-03-15 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Hi, In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed and approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131 For rawhide I also need gloox rebuilt for the new c++ string and list abi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

2015-03-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) > > 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed > and approved: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202131 > > For rawhide

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

2015-03-15 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2015-03-15 18:32 GMT-03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In case you would like to see it faster in Fedora :) >> >> 0ad-0.18 needs mozjs31, so I need this package reviewed >> and approved: >> htt

Re: mpich 3.1.4 in rawhide - soname changes

2015-03-15 Thread Dave Love
Orion Poplawski writes: >> Do we know if the actual ABI is incompatible, rather than library >> names/contents? If not, a compatibility libmpich might be useful, >> partly to avoid breaking existing binaries and partly because I suspect >> some things will look for a library of that name, at lea

Re: Update to 0ad-0.18

2015-03-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 06:58:27PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > 2015-03-15 18:32 GMT-03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:16:50PM -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> In case you would like to see it faster in Fedor

Re: Reason why non-commiters are not allowed to create buildroot overrides?

2015-03-15 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 03/15/2015 08:35 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, Just wondering, is there a particular reason why non-commiters are not allowed to create buildroot overrides for a package? Reason for asking: I've got a package (openambit) which installs a file to Konsole output %{_libdir}/wireshark/plugins/%{wi

Versioning preloader

2015-03-15 Thread Pranav Kant
I am packaging proxychains-ng[1] which make use of the .so file by its preloader only, and is not for any usable development. Hence, the upstream maintainer does not want[2] to version this .so file. To inhibit the rpmlint's unversioned so file warning, I have currently written a patch, and making

Re: DNF and mock

2015-03-15 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 03/15/2015 02:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in >> mock. I would like to share outcomes of this >> meeting. >> >> First I would like to state that you can alrea

RE: Versioning preloader

2015-03-15 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Hello: > I am packaging proxychains-ng[1] which make use of the .so file by its > preloader only, and is not for any usable development. Hence, the > upstream maintainer does not want[2] to version this .so file. > > To inhibit the rpmlint's unversioned so file warning, I have currently > written