Hi list,
I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes,
so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong
place!
I've seen lots of pages about how to become a Fedora packager, and the
processes for reviewing packages, but I haven't yet found anyt
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:34:36PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm looking forward to contributing to Fedora, after getting so much
> enjoyment and benefit from it for so long.
Welcome!
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100
fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora
> processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking
> in the wrong place!
Not at all. This is a fine place. ;)
> I've seen lots o
On 3/6/15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I started using Red Hat Linux in about 1996 or 1997 and have used
> GNU/Linux for all my personal computers ever since (moving from RHL to
> Fedora Core and then to Fedora). I've used a variety of unix-like
> systems at work, but mainly Red Hat derivatives (RHEL
On 7 Mar 2015, at 02:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
for 15:00 UTC. If your clocks go back this weekend, the meeting should
be at the same local time as it was before. If your clocks don't go
back, it will be one hour earlier.
Spring forward, Fall back.
--
Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> >> I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be among the inputs to that
> >> discussion.
> >
> > I'm fond of noting that pwquality has not yet blacklisted any variant
> > o
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:25 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > The way we deploy LUKS, a single password guess takes one second on a
> > comparable hardware, so the fuzz factor is not actually as large as it
> > might seem.
>
> Wow, I had no clue it was that good. OK, so
On 6 March 2015 at 22:58, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be among the inputs to that
>>> discussion.
>>>
>>
>> I'm fond of noting that pwquality has
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:52:34 -0500
> David Cantrell wrote:
>
>> From what I'm reading in the meeting logs and the ticket comments, it
>> appears the revert decision is basically a temporary solution and a
>> more formal security policy will be d
On Sex, 2015-03-06 at 21:42 +0100, gil wrote:
> hi
> after the latest update (qt , systemd, ...) i have this problem
>
>
> E: [pulseaudio] main.c: Starting the daemon failed.
> no audio only some buzz or click
> any ideas?
> regards
> gil
>
you may try this technique from https://userbase.kde.
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The point I am worried about is that Chris and you are treating this as a
> binary problem versus a spectrum one.
I'm treating this as a binary problem because for me, it is one. ANY
password policy installed in the installer is bad. Even if you only enforce
somethi
Il 07/03/2015 17:43, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
On Sex, 2015-03-06 at 21:42 +0100, gil wrote:
hi
after the latest update (qt , systemd, ...) i have this problem
E: [pulseaudio] main.c: Starting the daemon failed.
no audio only some buzz or click
any ideas?
regards
gil
you may try this techn
On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be among the inputs to that
discussion.
I'm fond of noting that pwquality has not ye
On 7 March 2015 at 11:14, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The point I am worried about is that Chris and you are treating this as a
> > binary problem versus a spectrum one.
>
> I'm treating this as a binary problem because for me, it is one. ANY
> password policy installed
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>
> Oops, sorry, got distracted. It is polymake. That package has
> multiple problems.
>
> First, it invokes undefined behavior in one bit of code. That
> happened to work out with gcc 4.x, but gcc 5.x compiles the code a bit
> differently, res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been working with Ian McLeod on getting oz and imagefactory
running on arm. I used the resulting work to build a docker base image
for arm. docker is installable on arm in f22 and rawhide though the
registry does not work very well. We are worki
On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be amon
On 7 Mar 2015, at 15:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton
wrote:
On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I hope https:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Can you post a link here for that gcc regression bug? Thanks.
There is no regression. The source code invoked undefined behavior.
Under such circumstances, the compiler is free to do anything at all.
Things just happened to work out right with g
On 7 March 2015 at 15:33, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> On 7 Mar 2015, at 15:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>>
>> On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote:
>>
>> Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>> On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100
> fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora
> > processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking
> > in the wrong pla
21 matches
Mail list logo
