Re: Idea: Apache configuration snippets

Le 22/02/2015 20:08, Adam Williamson a écrit : > On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:51 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: >> Le 22/02/2015 07:21, Adam Williamson a écrit : >>> Working on the ownCloud package today, it occurred to me that we >>> probably have quite a lot of packages carrying Apache access >>> contro

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput

Just wanted to thank for this feature. I installed xorg-x11-drv-libinput two days ago and middle button track point scrolling works like a charm. My life is much better now ;) Vít Dne 11.12.2014 v 14:42 Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > = Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use

Re: amending the new package process

On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 03:27, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 01/23/2015 04:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >>My experience with the new package process is that the review process in > >>Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a > >>revie

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 12 packages were orphaned - darkstat [el6] was orphaned by cicku Network traffic analyzer https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/darkstat dnrd [f20] was orphan

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, 20.02.15 11:48, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: > > While moving it is great, it's not really that important to move it. > > > > I mean, moving it is useful in the context of stateless systems that > > can boot up with empty /etc. However, Fedora is so far away from that, > > tha

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, 20.02.15 11:49, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: > > > > A recent example, systemd decided that os-release needed to be > > > > moved to /usr/lib/ I did not see any notification on devel@ nor > > > > was i contacted directly. the first I heard of it was a third > > > > party person

Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

Hi All, As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the necessary changes for this are in place for the GNOME and KDE desktops. So starting with t

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a): >> Hi All, >> >> As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg >> >> We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input >> driver for the Xorg xserver under Fe

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a): > Hi All, > > As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > > We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input > driver for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the necessary changes > for this are in

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

Hi, On 23-02-15 13:39, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi All, As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the

Reverting "Python 3 Migration Improvements" Change

Hi, I have to inform you that I had to revert the "Python 3 Migration Improvements" change for F22 - more precisely, its parts that would've caused both Python 2 and Python 3 being on atomic host or minimal cloud image. The reason is mentioned in [1] - in short, policycoreutils-python3 has only

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:23:01PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 20.02.15 11:48, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: > > > > While moving it is great, it's not really that important to move it. > > > > > > I mean, moving it is useful in the context of stateless systems that > >

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:25:59 +0200 Yanko Kaneti wrote: > This has been brewing in my head for a while so I'll just spill it > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora. ...snip... IMHO this would just add confusion. If something is so much in development that nothing using it

Re: Reverting "Python 3 Migration Improvements" Change

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:11:20 -0500 (EST) Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Hi, > I have to inform you that I had to revert the "Python 3 Migration > Improvements" change for F22 - more precisely, its parts that > would've caused both Python 2 and Python 3 being on atomic host or > minimal cloud image. The

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Cantrell wrote: > That is, and I am trying to > be specific here, changes that impact other components in the distribution > need to be coordinated in Fedora among the affected components. Almost every change might "affect other components" ... it might be

kernel 4.0-rc1

Hi All, The upstream kernel bumped the major version to 4.0-rc1 yesterday. Barring any unforeseen local test failures, the 4.0-rc1 build should land in the f22/rawhide composes tomorrow. The koji builds will be available a bit later today. Most of the userspace issues around the major version nu

Re: Reverting "Python 3 Migration Improvements" Change

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:11:20 -0500 (EST) > Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have to inform you that I had to revert the "Python 3 Migration >> Improvements" change for F22 - more precisely, its parts that >> would've caused both Python 2 a

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Cantrell wrote: > > That is, and I am trying to > > be specific here, changes that impact other components in the distribution > > need to be coordinated in Fedora among the affected components. > > Almost

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> > Sorry for the inconvenience and feel free to add bugs to the tracker, >> >> > which are >> >> > caused by systemd changes and have to be fixed in other comp

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:45:56AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > >> >> > Sorry for the inconvenience and feel free to add bugs to the tracker, > >> >> >

Re: orphaning wiiuse

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 00:11 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I'm orphaning the wiiuse package (for f22+), the last release was almost > > Correction I orphaned for all but f20. > > > 2 years ago and I have no time to care for it. > > > > Feel free

Re: service accepting commands from the network by default

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:16:48AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Elasticsearch was never safe: > > http://www.elasticsearch.org/community/security/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124252 > > So it shouldn't go ahead in current status. Thanks to everyone for their comments. Elas

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora. > I like the confession that no in-developemnt code gets magically stable after half year of sitting in the Rawhide. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:25:59 +0200 > Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > This has been brewing in my head for a while so I'll just spill it > > > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora. > ...snip... > > IMHO this would just add

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora. > > > I like the confession that no in-developemnt code gets magically > stable after > half year of sitting in the Rawhide. Indeed that was p

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:54:44 +0200 Yanko Kaneti wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:25:59 +0200 > > Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > > > This has been brewing in my head for a while so I'll just spill it > > > > > > Introduce an "in-development"

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 23.02.15 08:17, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Communication is a two way street, and as an upstream I cannot be in > > the business of pinging every single downstream about every single > > change individually, in particular if I consider the change > > unimportant. > >

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 23.02.15 08:52, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Cantrell > > wrote: > > > That is, and I am trying to > > > be specific here, changes that impact other components in the distribution > > >

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:04:13AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100 > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > >> > Sorry for the inconvenience and feel free to add bugs to the > > > >> > track

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hey! Come on. Everything that systemd does is create a symlink for > > /etc/resolv.conf if nothing else has created on for that. If something > > else created and owned that file, it leaves the thing alone. That's > > all. It'

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:13 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:54:44 +0200 > Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:25:59 +0200 > > > Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > > > > > This has been brewing in my head for a

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:17, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > Communication is a two way street, and as an upstream I cannot be in > > > the business of pinging every single downstream about every single > > > cha

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

Hi On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > And seriously, Rahul Sundaram is hardly a "third party person". He's one > of the active maintainers of systemd package, which you can easily > check in the pkgdb, as well as your colleague from Red Hat. > Neither is corr

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > Hey! Come on. Everything that systemd does is create a symlink for >> > /etc/resolv.conf if nothing else has created on for that. If something >> > else created a

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 23.02.15 10:52, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:17, David Cantrell (dcantr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > Communication is a two way street, and as an upstream I cannot be in > >

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 16:29 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:52, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, David Cantrell > > > wrote: > > > > That is, and I am trying to > > > > be sp

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1037 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 127 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3434/pylint-1.3.1-1.el6,python-astroid-1.2.1-2.el6,python-logilab-common-0

Re: RFC : in-development flag for packages

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:46:01 +0200 Yanko Kaneti wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:13 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:54:44 +0200 > > Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:25:59 +0200 > > > > Yan

Re: Idea: Apache configuration snippets

On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:47 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 22/02/2015 20:08, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 18:51 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > > > Le 22/02/2015 07:21, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > > > Working on the ownCloud package today, it occurred to me that > > > > we pro

Re: Linux 4.0

On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote: ... > things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers > (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_Drivers _ __

Re: Linux 4.0

On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote: On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote: ... things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_Dr

Re: Linux 4.0

Am 23.02.2015 um 18:38 schrieb poma: On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote: ... things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_

Re: Linux 4.0

On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote: >> On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote: >> ... >>> things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers >>> (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention. >> >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbi

Re: Linux 4.0

On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we can't read > your mind. > On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma" wrote: >> >> On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote: >>> On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote: On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boy

Re: Linux 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23/02/15 01:23 PM, poma wrote: > On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we >> can't read your mind. On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma" >> wrote: >>> >>> On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian

Re: Linux 4.0

Am 23.02.2015 um 19:23 schrieb poma: On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Don't deflect. There was no deflection. You gave no context and we can't read your mind. Either post more context in what you want or expect a lot of missed guesses on what you inferred For proprietary and

Re: Linux 4.0

On 23.02.2015 19:29, Digimer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 23/02/15 01:23 PM, poma wrote: >> On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we >>> can't read your mind. On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma

Re: Linux 4.0

Am 23.02.2015 um 19:35 schrieb poma: On 23.02.2015 19:29, Digimer wrote: Don't top post Mister Context. Can we be more civil please? Can you not spam us with your "PGP SIGNED MESSAGE", please? IT IS ENOUGH just because *you* can't install GPG you call other posts "spam" while the only sp

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

> Communication is a two way street, and as an upstream I cannot be in > the business of pinging every single downstream about every single > change individually, in particular if I consider the change > unimportant. Sure, that makes sense. > To learn about changes upstream, please follow the ups

Re: Linux 4.0

Please stop with the off topic, unhelpful stuff. This is your only warning from one of your moderators. Thanks! kevin pgpzq8sEan92h.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

On 23.02.2015 13:32, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > > We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver > for the Xorg xserver under Fedora 22. All the necessary changes for this are > in p

Re: Linux 4.0

You shout it out, But I can't hear a word you say You're talking loud, not saying much You criticize but all your bullets ricochet You shoot me down, but I get up You shoot me down but I won't fall I am titanium D.G. _ __ ____ | | (_)_ __ _ ___ __ | || | / _

Re: Linux 4.0

ok folks, this thread is closed. ;) kevin pgp_0xhsi55k6.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:56:50AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > >> > Hey! Come on. Everything that systemd does is create a symlink for > >> > /etc/resolv

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

There are patches waiting in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651 And I think almost every poster so far in this thread has the technical knowledge to review them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora C

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:40:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a): > >> Hi All, > >> > >> As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > >> > >> We've been working on making xorg

Re: Linux 4.0

There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we can't read your mind. On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma" wrote: > > On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote: > >> On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> ... > >>> things might still pop up. If y

Re: New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

Excerpts from Ralph Bean's message of 2015-02-21 06:36 +10:00: > I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the > first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release > Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:54:55PM +0100, poma wrote: > On 23.02.2015 13:32, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > > > > We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver > > for the Xorg xse

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:02:50PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > There are patches waiting in: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651 > > And I think almost every poster so far in this thread has the technical > knowledge to review them. Yeah, sorry, I previously looked at the ana

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On 02/23/2015 05:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:02:50PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: There are patches waiting in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651 And I think almost every poster so far in this thread has the technical knowledge to revi

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

poma wrote: > What is this strange command "sudo dnf"!? > > Maybe you are thinking of > $ pkexec yum install xorg-x11-drv-libinput As long as the bikeshed is blue… or red… or… ;-) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: Reverting "Python 3 Migration Improvements" Change

Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > I have to inform you that I had to revert the "Python 3 Migration > Improvements" change for F22 - more precisely, its parts that would've > caused both Python 2 and Python 3 being on atomic host or minimal cloud > image. The reason is mentioned in [1] - in short, policycor

Re: Easiest way to debug build failures on rawhide?

On 02/22/2015 10:21 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Orion Poplawski mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>> wrote: On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm looking into another issue on F22 but there's no .cfg for that. Is that still just comi

copr chroots not get updated

Anyone else experiencing problems with copr chroots not getting updated with newer builds? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195480 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane

Re: Easiest way to debug build failures on rawhide?

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/22/2015 10:21 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Orion Poplawski > > wrote: >> >> On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: >> >> >> I'm looking into another issu

Re: Note for packages linking against GSL [ACTION NEEDED]

On 02/22/2015 02:09 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 03:50:16PM -0800, Susi Lehtola wrote: Because libgsl is no longer linked to a CBLAS library, packages linking to GSL need to also link to a CBLAS library, ATLAS probably being the best candidate since OpenBLAS is not avail

Re: Note for packages linking against GSL [ACTION NEEDED]

On 21 February 2015 at 18:50, Susi Lehtola wrote: > Because libgsl is no longer linked to a CBLAS library, packages linking to > GSL need to also link to a CBLAS library, ATLAS probably being the best > candidate since OpenBLAS is not available for all Fedora architectures. Can you elaborate on th

Re: Libinput now enabled as default xorg driver for F-22 workstation installs

Dne 23.2.2015 v 23:22 Peter Hutterer napsal(a): > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:40:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> Dne 23.2.2015 v 13:32 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi All, As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Libinput

[Bug 1195526] perl-Pod-Simple-3.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195526 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Pod-Simple-3.30-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=614442 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsub