Compose started at Fri Jan 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: bats-0.4.0-1.20141016git3b33a5a.fc22
Bash Automated Testing System
New package: perl-Dancer2-0.158000-1.fc22
Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
New package: radamsa-0.4-2.fc22
Test
Dne 22.1.2015 v 15:30 Jan Zelený napsal(a):
> On 22. 1. 2015 at 15:06:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:33:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so everything is
ok here
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
>> like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for
>> -units.
> Thi
- Original Message -
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> > How exactly is Fedora Atomic generated? It seems that
> > fedpra-cloud-atomic.ks has no %packages section...
> > I can find out how we're doing with Atomic assuming I know how it's
> > constructed
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3].
ma.
[1]
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Flash+0-Day+Exploit+Used+by+Angler+Ex
Hi all,
>From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
(so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
(There's also a bug discovered when doing this split -- the python3 build
wasn't shipp
Hello,
2015-01-23 11:04 GMT+01:00 Michel Alexandre Salim :
> Hi all,
>
> From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
> documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
> (so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
>
> (There's also
Hi Sergio,
Indeed, that is the same bug. I'm away from the computer until Monday, so
I'll do the stable release updates then - unless a comaintainer can do it
over the weekend.
The stable updates will probably be just bug fixes and won't introduce the
packaging split or version bump.
Cheers,
-
On 01/22/2015 03:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> This is not really true. Koji write out its own mock configs and will
> not be using dnf for any operations. for anytime soon. koji hass no
> way to use different tools to install chroots we will continue to use
> yum to install the buildroots for th
>> current kernels being removed
>
> This was fixed almost a year ago
>
>> and other such issues
>
> Name them please. Or better yet, report them.
That issue about removing core packages isn't fixed properly. I said I
would do some testing and had a little bit of spare time today so did
some testi
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:45:21PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Jan 21, 2015, at 8:00, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > Also I'd like to point out that if two packages offer the same provide, by
> > definition it means they are 100% exchangeable from the perspective of that
> > functionality.
>
On Fri, 23.01.15 04:41, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > systemd-filesystem sounds like a good idea. As for this proposal -- while it
> > might reduce the size of the buildroot used to build packages depending on
> > systemd-related macros, what would the effect be on minimal insta
Hi everyone,
Elections Questionnaire needs more questions for Fedora Magazine
interviews! If you have anything you'd like to ask candidates to
FESCo, add it to the wiki today.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/Questionnaire
Thanks
Jaroslav
___
de
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 18:14
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Re: python3-pyparted in F20/F21?
>
> On 01/
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 08:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Which is something I find a really questionable idea btw. There's a
> lot of stuff systemd does, and it's naive to believe you can just not
> do them and get away with it in a container.
The discussion is more subtle than that - with
On 23/01/15 13:12, John Florian wrote:
On 01/22/2015 03:17 PM, John Florian wrote:
If I read this page[1] correctly, python3-pyparted should be available
starting with F20, yet…
Did I miss something?
Looks like apps doesn't quite handle subpackages correctly. So while
pyparted
is in F20, th
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
> If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
> for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q flash-plugin
flash-plugin-11.2.202.438-release.x86_64
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package "fall off"?
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
poma wrote:
> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > Folk,
> >
> > There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
> > [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
> > click-to-play mode for it.
>
> Are we covered with
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Re
Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
created, but i always have this error:
[empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -n ssr
INFO: Processing local files: ssr
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in
/h
Please update to latest version
On Fri 23 Jan 2015 03:33:51 PM CET Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
> created, but i always have this error:
>
> [empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
> fedora-rawhide
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
>
> Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
>
> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
> NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
> when will this package "fall
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
>> poma wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
[1][2]. If you use flash
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:37:34AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
> >> like it would be
commit 3feb092344ab4659ff7078f78c19082a79c376cb
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:28:18 2015 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode-Locale.spec | 30 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 delet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181529
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On 01/23/2015 03:24 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
Meeting ended Fri Jan 23 15:39:44 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot
Am 22.01.2015 um 18:44 schrieb poma:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package "fall off"?
hopefully never until
Am 23.01.2015 um 12:44 schrieb poma:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q flash-plugin
flash-plugin-11.2
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
>>> poma wrote:
>>>
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash
On Jan 23, 2015 7:47 AM, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote:
>
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
> > On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
> >> poma wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day fl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2015 04:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100 poma
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
On 01/23/2015 09:29 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
Until this is resolved, is this a valid way:
$ sandbox -X -T tmp -t sandbox_web_t firefox
to cover this security issue, or can we isolate only libflashplayer.so,
not the entire browser.
Daniel, can you comment.
On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> sandbox -X will also add more protection.
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
>
I gave it a try;
sandbox -X
/usr/bin/sandbox:
/usr/sbin/seunshare is required for the action you want to perform.
Sadly, a naive (a
Once upon a time, Matthias Runge said:
> /usr/sbin/seunshare is required for the action you want to perform.
>
> Sadly, a naive (and not so naive) dnf reporequery, repoquery and yum
> search did not show the right dep.
Don't know about dnf, but a simple "yum install /usr/sbin/seunshare"
will do
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > libflashplayer.so runs within the Mozilla-plugin I believe. If so it
> > would be confined
> > if you have not turned on the unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition boolean.
> >
>
>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>>>
>>> sandbox -X will also add more protection.
>>
>> Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
>>
> I gave it a try;
>
> sandbox -X
> /usr/bin/sandbox:
> /usr/sbin/seunsh
Dne Čt 22. ledna 2015 14:54:47, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 13:40 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 21. 1. 2015 at 11:07:31, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > 1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so
> > > > > > everything is
> > > > > > ok here.
> > > > >
>
On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
> poma wrote:
>
>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> Folk,
>>>
>>> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
>>> [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
>>> click
-- snip --
> koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has not
> mechanism to support using different backends. additionally some of the
> builders are rhel6 so whatever is done has to work on rhel6 and fedora.
Huh, I was under the impression that everything was already migrat
On 01/23/2015 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> on servers and static machines you don't need any dynamic network
> configuration
which is why NM in F22 will have a "configure-and-quit" mode for such
machines
-- Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:15:10AM +0100, Haïkel wrote:
2015-01-21 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos :
Besides, some submitters do not try hard enough to find reviewers:
* some reviews do not provide usable links to spec and srpm breaking usage of
semi-automated reviewing tool. The mor
Just FYI, we updated the koji hub(s) today.
We were hoping it would be a complete non event, but alas, there was a
short window where a link was not setup correctly and some builds
failed. ;( Sorry for the trouble and please do resubmit.
The old hubs were 32 bit rhel6 instances, and the new ones
(Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
== Overview ==
Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network install (and more
generally, unattended installation) story in Fedora 21 was somewhat
l
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:27:46 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> There's one issue we are looking into to be aware of, builds now
> give: SysCallError: (-1, 'Unexpected EOF')
> instead of watching the build you just started. The build is running
> fine and you can follow it on the web interfac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:40:11 +0100
Jan Zeleny wrote:
> -- snip --
>
> > koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has
> > not mechanism to support using different backends. additionally
> > some of the builders are rhel6 so whate
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
* Fedora Server
- Server branding
- Default environment group: Fedora Server
- Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM on XFS (except /boot)
- Responsible WG: Server WG
I got bitten by the f
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
>
> == Overview ==
>
> Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
> media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network install (and more
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> My experience with the new package process is that the review process in
> Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a
> reviewer to appear, some others more, some where reviewed faster. My
> understanding is that it depends on how interestin
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
>> * Fedora Server
>> - Server branding
>> - Default environment group: Fedora Server
>> - Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a bit, so let's get together and check in on where
we're all at. I'm expecting ro
52 matches
Mail list logo
