Re: Where is yaws?

2015-01-03 Thread Christopher Meng
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote: > was retired because were having multiple failed builds from fedora 15 > > see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843203 Thank you for the info shared above, I will try building it and then submit it again. -- de

rawhide report: 20150103 changes

2015-01-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jan 3 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6 aesku

Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread gil
Hi, i have a problem with driver video, on my Fedora 21 KDE i686 any ideas? thanks in advance - gil lspci -nn |grep VGA 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 220] [10de:0a20] (rev a2) xrandr --verbose xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output defau

Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2015 12:41 PM, gil wrote: > Hi, i have a problem with driver video, on my Fedora 21 KDE i686 > any ideas? thanks in advance - gil > > lspci -nn |grep VGA 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: > NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 220] [

Re: allowing programs to open ports

2015-01-03 Thread Björn Persson
Florian Weimer wrote: >On 12/21/2014 05:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > >> Alternatively, cut out the packet filter and have GlibC ask the user >> whether the call to bind or connect shall be allowed to succeed (or >> automatically allow or deny the call if so configured). This has the >> advantage t

Re: allowing programs to open ports

2015-01-03 Thread Björn Persson
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >1) I do not feel that countless programs will or want to accept >patches to open ports twice. I expect them to actually open a port >once and if they want to work with firewalld or some other firewall >daemon signal on dbus that they are looking to have a port open usin

R: Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread punto...@libero.it
i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil >Messaggio originale >Da: anto.tra...@gmail.com >Data: 03/01/2015 13.05 >A: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >Ogg: Re: Screen low resolution > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On 01/03/2015 12:41 PM, gil wrote: >> Hi, i

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Alec Leamas
On 02/01/15 11:42, Richard Hughes wrote: Because as of now, gnome-software just doesn't fit the workstation bill I think you're misunderstanding what most developers do. We probably spend about 10 minutes installing development packages (on the command line) when setting up a new OS instance.

Re: R: Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote: > i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is, check why it does not work properly. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Xorg_pro

Re: R: Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread gil
Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote: >> i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil > You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is, > check why it does not work proper

R: Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2015 04:00 PM, gil wrote: > Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto: On 01/03/2015 01:33 > PM, punto...@libero.it wrote: i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil > You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is,

Re: R: Re: Screen low resolution

2015-01-03 Thread gil
Il 03/01/2015 15:44, Antonio Trande ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2015 04:00 PM, gil wrote: Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto: On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote: i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil You must check if the nV

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
/*Alec Leamas */ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:57:10 +0100: On 02/01/15 11:42, Richard Hughes wrote: <> That said, my gut feeling is that the balance between simplicity and functionality is quite different for a "novice user" and a developer and that this needs to be handled with differe

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
/*Luya Tshimbalanga*/ wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:29:14 -0800: On 02/01/15 01:15 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Probably true, but it already includes fonts and input sources. So, someone has felt that 'front-end applications only' is too narrow. Now, where you can draw the line? I exagg

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Alec Leamas
On 03/01/15 20:26, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: /*Luya Tshimbalanga*/ wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:29:14 -0800: Add-ons cannot cover development libraries, unless every library is an add-on for all IDEs! Then is IDE packaging issue. When it comes of using a development applications, the so

Yet another frustration with Fedora package management

2015-01-03 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
Hi! Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from repositories regardless of the package management tool you use. As it seems, then only way you can do this is to exclude it from the repositories themselves inside their configuration file in /etc/yum.repos.d/, because the

Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Gary Scarborough
Sorry this is a bit late but I had a few thoughts on what I have read in this thread: Is workstation being aimed at new users or developers? And is the goal the same for Gnome? If Gnome is aiming to cater to new users, then is it the right primary DE for fedora? There seems to be a misalignment

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 15:56:55 -0500 Gary Scarborough wrote: > Sorry this is a bit late but I had a few thoughts on what I have read > in this thread: > > Is workstation being aimed at new users or developers? And is the > goal the same for Gnome? If Gnome is aiming to cater to new users, > then

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Richard Hughes
On 3 January 2015 at 20:56, Gary Scarborough wrote: > Is workstation being aimed at new users or developers? I don't think people fit clearly in these simplistic groups. I'm an experienced GNOME developer, but I've never used C# before. > A package manager that can show ALL packages should be in

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
/*Kevin Fenzi*/ wrote on Sat, 3 Jan 2015 14:09:11 -0700: On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 15:56:55 -0500 Gary Scarborough wrote: <...> Instead of hiding the CLI from new users, why not simply give them the option of avoiding it? Instead of only showing gui apps, why not show all with packages being tagged

Re: Yet another frustration with Fedora package management

2015-01-03 Thread Rex Dieter
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > Hi! > Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from > repositories regardless of the package management tool you use. As it > seems, then only way you can do this is to exclude it from the > repositories themselves inside their configuration file in

Re: Yet another frustration with Fedora package management

2015-01-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.01.2015 um 23:58 schrieb Rex Dieter: Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Hi! Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from repositories regardless of the package management tool you use. As it seems, then only way you can do this is to exclude it from the repositories themsel

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: If you type "package" into the dash the fist entry is "GNOME Packages" which is the install/remove tool from gnome-packagekit. You can install it with three clicks. I don't think it makes sense to install it by default. We may have been too

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > We may have been too aggressive in removing it. I think we could include > it by default if it had a first-run dialog that briefly explains what a > package is, and that package management is an advanced tool for system > administrato

Re: Yet another frustration with Fedora package management

2015-01-03 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > >> Hi! >> Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from >> repositories regardless of the package management tool you use. As it >> seems, then only way you can do this is to exclude it from the >>

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 30 December 2014 at 23:31, Chris Murphy wrote: >> b.) Would it be helpful, friendlier, and better emphasize the special >> focus, if these group install items mentioned above were exposed in >> GNOME Software with an appropriate icon? >

File location

2015-01-03 Thread Anshu Prateek
hi, I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts some of its file in /opt/aerospike. The two main folders in use (by upstream) are /opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions shipped with the package. /opt/aerospike/usr/udf/ - This will have

Re: File location

2015-01-03 Thread Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
Open a ticket in FPC, you can may only use directories in the /opt/fedora, however fpc can help you decide whether it's a valid use of /opt and what subdirectory should be allocated for your use [1][2] [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Limited_usage_of_.2Fopt.2C_.2Fetc.2Fopt.

Re: File location

2015-01-03 Thread Anshu Prateek
Thanks echevemaster. Created https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/487 On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 12:51:16 PM Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado < echevemas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Open a ticket in FPC, you can may only use directories in the > /opt/fedora, however fpc can help you decide whether it's a

Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from gnome-software and desktop environments

2015-01-03 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "Hedayat Vatankhah" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 11:15:58 PM > Subject: Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora,but stemming > from gnome-software and desktop environments > > > > Luya Ts