On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> >
> > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
> > think of
Dne 29.11.2014 v 12:56 Pádraig Brady napsal(a):
> On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote:
>> Hi
>> Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has?
> Considering just packages:
> https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages
>
> Of course there are many more behind the scenes of the program
Compose started at Mon Dec 1 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[NetworkManager-openconnect]
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.9.8.4-4.fc22.i686 requires
libopen
Compose started at Mon Dec 1 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[openstack-nova]
openstac
While we're on it (in the form "how many devs do we have"): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said, feedback in the form "How many users uses/installs my p
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
While we're on it (in the form "how many devs do we have"): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said, feedback in
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have something similar?
no - you have no clue which mirror was used without explicit tracking in
YUM/DNF and given t
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have something similar?
no - you have no clue which mirror was used wi
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
> >On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
> >
> >>>Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
> >>>counter
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the
On 01/12/14 12:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> >On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
> >>>On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.12
On 01/12/14 13:10, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> So we come back to the question: is any number better than no number
>> at all?
>> Even to get a trend?
>>
> Yes, I think so. Even a bad number can be used for trends and comparisons.
>
> That said, let's not limit this discussion to the "download counter"
On 1. 12. 2014 at 12:26:07, Alec Leamas wrote:
> While we're on it (in the form "how many devs do we have"): How
> hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
> of users, per package?
>
> Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
> said,
On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the "download counter"
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
thing. Or something else, which I cannot i
>> That said, let's not limit this discussion to the "download counter"
>> concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
>> which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
>> thing. Or something else, which I cannot imagine.
Well, if you target "end u
Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169240
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduc
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
2 packages were orphaned
perl-Object-Accessor [el6, el5] was orphaned by psabata
Interface to create per object accessors
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packa
QtSingleApplication
http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
Does GTK+ has such functionality?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Till, let me help you a bit to finally engage latest USB_ModeSwitch and data
package in Fedora 21.
- Refer to proper usb_modeswitch-data version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169234
- Add missed REFERENCE file & refer to proper usb_modeswitch version
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Monday, December 1, 2014, poma wrote:
>
> QtSingleApplication
> http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
>
> Does GTK+ has such functionality?
>
>
> Yes https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkApplication.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hi,
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 07:39 +0100, poma wrote:
> Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
You should try being less snarky in your future communications, it
usually leads to better results.
> Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On Monday, December 1, 2014, drago01 wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, December 1, 2014, poma > wrote:
>
>>
>> QtSingleApplication
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
>>
>> Does GTK+ has such functionality?
>>
>>
>> Yes https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkApplication.html
>
On 01/12/14 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the "download counter"
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
> > at all), wh
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:39:14 +0100
poma wrote:
>
> Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
>
> Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169240
This is a duplicate of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065457
On 01/12/14 15:20, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 14:40:44, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 01/12/14 13:56, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 12:26:07, Alec Leamas wrote:
While we're on it (in the form "how many devs do we have"): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimat
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:19:48PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > One suggestion was to install it as a dependency of the NTP packages.
> > Is this a good idea? Should this first go through the Fedora change
> > process or at least be documented somewhere?
>
> I th
On Mon, 01.12.14 15:55, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Beside the selection of the NTP service that should enabled/disabled,
> there are some minor differences in the functionality. For instance,
> when setting the time, timedatex compensates for the time spent in the
> polkit aut
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > > par
Summary of changes:
e5efed4... Escape slashes in filters (#544738) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21.
Thursday, December 04, 2014 17:00 UTC (12 AM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if t
On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 13:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
> > at all), where peo
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 08:59 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > > to be p
A new version of sympy is available, with a new dependency. Who would like
to swap reviews? I need this one:
python-fastcache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel maili
On 12/01/2014 07:28 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> A new version of sympy is available, with a new dependency. Who would like
> to swap reviews? I need this one:
>
> python-fastcache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
>
T
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Taken.
> Please, review this package
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737.
Taken, thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 29.11.2014 v 12:56 Pádraig Brady napsal(a):
>> On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has?
>> Considering just packages:
>> https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages
>>
>> O
CVC4 has a new version with a new dependency. How about yet another
review swap, this time for abc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169492
Let me know what I can review in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 1 December 2014 at 05:37, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> On 01/12/14 13:10, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> >> So we come back to the question: is any number better than no number
> >> at all?
> >> Even to get a trend?
> >>
> > Yes, I think so. Even a bad number can be used for trends and
> comparisons.
> >
>
On 1 December 2014 at 05:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
>>>
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.1
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 14:34 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> We've had something of this kind many years go. It was called smolt and
> had proven to be worthless and the origin of heated controversials.
smolt did hardware stats, not software. It "proved to be useless"
merely because it was badly
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 14:34 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> We've had something of this kind many years go. It was called smolt and
>> had proven to be worthless and the origin of heated controversials.
>
> smolt did hardware stats, not softw
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> good, it would have been very useful indeed. And it was controversial
> because you can't wipe your nose on fedora-devel without someone
> accusing you of a conspiracy to destroy Linux.
We're actively working to improve that last pa
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On 01/12/14 22:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
good, it would have been very useful indeed. And it was controversial
because you can't wipe your nose on fedora-devel without someone
accusing you of a conspiracy to destroy Linux.
We're ac
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
> > >On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
>> how to even begin tracking it down. ...
>>
>
> File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda
> as a separate text/plain attachment. The storage.
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10 Fedora gets about 6
Tried powertop - see slight improveme
On 1 December 2014 at 17:57, john.tiger wrote:
> Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
>
> I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
> stinks on Fedora 20.
>
> OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
> Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> >
> > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
> > think of
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Feedback why this is impossible isn't really helpful here, most of us are
> aware of the limitations. Given that we agree on the overall goals (?),
> useful input is what can be done, and how.
I don't think it's fair to say we agree on the over
On 1 December 2014 at 19:57, john.tiger wrote:
> Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
>
> I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
> stinks on Fedora 20.
>
> OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
> Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10 Fe
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:46:39PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> That's not to say that there aren't useful questions that could be
> answered, but so far they haven't been asked. I think if you start
> with the right question, it will be easier to find a route to the
> answer.
Okay, this seems like
Hi
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Okay, this seems like a good start. What _are_ the right questions?
* Which packages are part of the default installation for various products
or spins that users actively remove?
* Which packages are not part of the installation t
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 17:57 -0700, john.tiger wrote:
> Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
>
> I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
> stinks on Fedora 20.
>
> OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
> Chrome OS on Chromebook gets
57 matches
Mail list logo
