On 11/23/2014 05:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
The tiles are coming from Mozilla. So yes please explain how the
advertisers can track me through them if I don't click them.
Much depends on what's in the tile. For example an embedded 1 pixel
transparent gif, commonly known as a "web bug", and
On Sunday, 23 November 2014 1:59 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>I would suggesting going through the feature process. Although the config
>file change itself is trivial, there are multiple components that require
>coordination with several teams (Anaconda, Fedora Security team, openSSH,
>GNOME etc), t
On 11/23/2014 06:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Nikos Roussos
> wrote:
>> On 11/18/2014 08:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos
>>> wrote:
On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 a
Compose started at Mon Nov 24 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[OpenLP]
OpenLP-2.1.1-1.fc22.noarch requires libreoffice-headless
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-
Am 24.11.2014 um 11:41 schrieb Nikos Roussos:
On 11/23/2014 06:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I'm afraid it's not reasonable to assume that just because Mozilla is
providing the hooks to publish web ads that those web ads do not,
themselves, collect and use personal user data, especially the c
Compose started at Mon Nov 24 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[gearbox]
gearbox-10.11-8
> On Monday, 24 November 2014 2:59 PM, P J P wrote:
> > On Sunday, 23 November 2014 1:59 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I would suggesting going through the feature process...
>> Having FESCo review a proposal is useful as well.
>
> Right, makes sense. I'll do that.
Please see -> https://fedoraproje
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Version:
8955a7292d1039f01d76272464812b0e Perl-Version-1.013.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
perl-Statistics-Descriptive-3.0607-1.fc22 changed license
from (GPL+ or Artistic) to ((GPL+ or Artistic) and MIT).
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
A while ago I noticed that a Debian package has some useful patches for some
package and some of these patches are required to update the Fedora package. I
was wondering if there is a summary about licensing of Debian patches and if
it is acceptable just to copy Debian's patches into Fedora (with
On 11/24/2014 02:34 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
A while ago I noticed that a Debian package has some useful patches for some
package and some of these patches are required to update the Fedora package. I
was wondering if there is a summary about licensing of Debian patches and if
it is acceptable j
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
12 packages were orphaned
-
R2spec [el5] was orphaned by pingou
Python script to generate R spec file
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R2spec
drupal6-fre
On 29 September 2014 at 12:36, Richard Hughes wrote:
> At the end of November I'll change the
> minimum icon size in the AppStream generator so that applications not
> fixed will be dropped from the metadata.
I've now done this for F22, the following packages being affected:
https://github.com/hu
On 2014-11-24, 11:02 GMT, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and *that* is the real problem of the whole thread: 90% are based on
> assumptions and opinions instead of verified facts which is very strange
> when talking about open source
Or without checking tons of information provided on the Mozilla
websi
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 10:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > These new rules don't ban "preventing a slip", they attempt to eliminate
> > the unreasonable demands we're putting on our volunteer QA team *every
> > week during Freeze*. It's gotten out of hand and it's burn
Hi,
I've taken over djvulibre/epel6 to avoid retiring the package.
Co-maintainers are welcome.
François
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I have working packages [1] for genesis and moose
> (both neuron simulators). I didn't submit them because
> genesis is old and buggy, and moose a bit unstable, but
> with the release of v. 3 I'll submit it as a Fedora p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/24/2014 03:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Zbigniew
> Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> I have working packages [1] for genesis and moose (both neuron
>> simulators). I didn't submit them because
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:18
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and testin
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC (run "date -d '2014-11-26 16:00 UTC'" to see local time)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
While we just had a out of band blocker review today after the QA meeting, we'll
still be having our regularly scheduled
20 matches
Mail list logo
