Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Am 16.11.2014 um 06:31 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 11/15/2014 11:41 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: I don't really understand the issue at all. We have a "no-phone-home" and "no-spy" policy in Fedora and arbt is not phone-home? if you really fight for a "no-phone-home"-policy you need to do that

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/16/2014 10:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.11.2014 um 06:31 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 11/15/2014 11:41 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: I don't really understand the issue at all. We have a "no-phone-home" and "no-spy" policy in Fedora and arbt is not phone-home? abrt is supposed to be o

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Am 16.11.2014 um 11:07 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 11/16/2014 10:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.11.2014 um 06:31 schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 11/15/2014 11:41 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: I don't really understand the issue at all. We have a "no-phone-home" and "no-spy" policy in Fedora and

F-21 Branched report: 20141116 changes

Compose started at Sun Nov 16 07:15:07 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2 [authhub] authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0 [avro] avro-mapred-

rawhide report: 20141116 changes

Compose started at Sun Nov 16 05:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty] audtt

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > So Mozilla has recently gone live with its advertisement tiles on the > "New Tab" page. Only newly created profiles get to see this stuff. > > On a pristine F21 install using Gnome, when first launching Firefox, > users are presented with a num

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 10:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > and arbt is not phone-home? ABRT will never send anything without user permission. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 2014-11-16, 05:31 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> I don't really understand the issue at all. > We have a "no-phone-home" and "no-spy" policy in Fedora. And I believe the same goes for the Mozilla ... did anybody check their privacy policy? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/ Also, https:

Geting back a package to a previous version

Hi: I need to get back to htmlparser 1.5 (from current 1.6 one) due a bug with OmegaT[1]. OmegaT is the only package requiring htmlparser (checked with repoquery) so I assume the change is safe. My only doubt is what is the better practice to do this. I'm supposing I should increase the Epoch. Is

Re: Geting back a package to a previous version

On 11/16/2014 04:19 PM, Ismael Olea wrote: > I need to get back to htmlparser 1.5 (from current 1.6 one) due a bug > with OmegaT[1]. OmegaT is the only package requiring htmlparser (checked > with repoquery) so I assume the change is safe. > > My only doubt is what is the better practice to do thi

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Dne 15.11.2014 v 15:06 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Lars Seipel wrote: >> What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship >> applications to carry ads and report tracking data? > No! > > IMHO, we should consider dropping Firefox from Fedora entirely, in favor of > Epiphany for Workst

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad < mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel > wrote: > > So Mozilla has recently gone live with its advertisement tiles on the > > "New Tab" page. Only newly created profiles get to see this stuff. > > >

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

I went back and reviewed Fedora Forbidden Items and saw nothing that applied to the situation with Firefox. While I agree with the statement: "The concerns raised are that the default configuration is an "opt-out" vs. "opt-in" mod

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > I went back and reviewed Fedora Forbidden Items > and > saw nothing that applied to the situation with Firefox. While I agree with > the statement: "The concerns raised ar

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad > mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel > wrote: > > So Mozilla has recently gone live with its adver

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in LXDE environment, but after that again everytime it failed. Then I tried using "debugging" kernel on GRUB menu, and now each time I tried suspend/resume in all environments (GNOME 3, LXDE, Cinnamon, XFCE) it worked every time as e

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in > LXDE environment, but after that again everytime it failed. > > Then I tried using "debugging" kernel on GRUB menu, and now each time > I tried suspend/resume i

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in >> LXDE environment, but after that again everytime it failed. >> >> Then I tried using "debugging

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:11 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in >>> LXDE environment, but

Re: Taskotron depcheck broken/incomplete (was: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree)

I wrote: > The Taskatron depcheck appears to be broken or incomplete: It might be > effective at checking whether the new package has any broken dependencies, > but it definitely does not appear to check whether the update breaks OTHER > packages' dependencies (at least I've seen 2 instances where

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Well, how to put it ... Mozilla.com's role in fedora has many times been > subject to controvercies, but doubts have always been ruled ;) They always get special exceptions for any and all Fedora policies that upstream does not want to comply with, with the excuse that oth

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > The "ads" are not intrusive, they don't collect personally > identifiable data, and can be disabled with a selection from a button > on the start page! > See: > http://www.pcworld.com/article/2848017/how-to-get-rid-of-firefoxs-new-ads-on-the-new-tab-page.html The instruct

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

On 17.11.2014 01:04, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Just a quick update - i got suspend/resume to once randomly work in >> LXDE environment, but after that again everytime it failed. >> >> Then I tried using "debugging" kernel on G

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 15.11.2014 16:51, Michael Catanzaro wrote: ... > We're working hard on WebKitGTK+ ... ... This is something new? :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers#WebKit-based WebKit-based Amazon Kindle (experimental) Arora (discontinued) BOLT browser (discontinued) Chromium

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: [meshmagick] meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1 meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1 meshmagick has been rebuilt in rawhide and f21 (reques

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad > > mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel >

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Hi, I just wanted to make a recommendation based on a few comments that were made thus far. On 11/16/2014 11:11 PM, Christopher wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos mailto:comzer...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/16/2014 02:47 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 10:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: and arbt is not phone-home? ABRT will never send anything without user permission. Except when it does (due to bugs). And I'm sorry to say that I think the UI is still confusing and may