On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
Rpm in
On 9. 10. 2014 at 08:57:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
> >> 2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> >>> Greetings.
> >>>
> >>> This F21 change:
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
> >>>
> >>> has br
On 9.10.2014 09:27, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 9. 10. 2014 at 08:57:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has broug
-- snip --
> > Do you mean something like this?
> >
> > http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies
>
> It would be nice if words "weak dependencies" at
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.12.0
> linked to
> http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies#Weakdependencies
>
> Jan, do you have righ
2014-10-09 8:57 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius :
>
> I do not.
>
I understand your point of view, in a different context (ie: dnf being
default package manager), I would have shared yours.
>
> We need a precise and detailed functional description about what these "weak
> dependencies" are supposed to d
On 10/08/2014 11:04 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Before dnf gets promoted as the default package manager, it would be
interesting to do some widespread testing.
I would like to point out, that you can use weak dependencies in Copr in F21
and rawhide chroots.
Which should give you enough space for testing
On 10/02/2014 05:48 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 05:18 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> Problem:
>>> Currently, copr allows to add a link to an arbitrary repo URL that is
>>> available for installing dependencies during buil
On 09/10/14 06:28, Brandon Vincent wrote:
> Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in
> regards to nagios with no success [1].
>
> Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project
> or possibly have an alternative method to reach him?
Strangely, no
I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
Due to a job with more responsibilities and less Red Hat, Fedora and PHP,
I don't have the time needed to keep up with the Fedora Next and PHP
ecosystem changes.
It wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm working on Icecat-31's RPM building but I'm blocked by a strange
problem. Have you never seen something like that?
..
STOP! /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/js/src/configure
has changed and needs to be run again.
Please rerun
Compose started at Thu Oct 9 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Compose started at Thu Oct 9 05:15:08 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so
On 10/09/2014 05:21 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
mediawiki-wikicalendar -- Simple calendar extension for mediawiki (
master f21 f20 f19 el6 el5 )
I noticed you are the upstream for this and it seems like very low maintenance
(no update for 5 years). Would you still have time to act as upstream?
On 9 October 2014 15:03, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 05:21 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
>>
>> mediawiki-wikicalendar -- Simple calendar extension for mediawiki (
>> master f21 f20 f19 el6 el5 )
>
>
> I noticed you are the upstream for this and it seems like very low
> maintenance (no
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christof Damian
wrote:
> I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
> already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
>
> Due to a job with more responsibilities and less Red Hat, Fedora and PHP,
> I don't have the time
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Synopsis:
c6b0eb651f8b95757ccee4f430d659bf Test-Synopsis-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
You can assign the remaining php-* ones that Remi didn't take to me if you
would like.
On Oct 9, 2014 6:22 AM, "Christof Damian" wrote:
> I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
> already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
>
> Due to a job with more
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> I think you should probably ignore the fact that Affix happens to be the
> first point of contact, and instead email "peter" or "jpo" who are the
> active maintainers.
I've notified them multiple times as well. BZ assigns the ticket to
the lis
Thanks Shawn.
And more thanks also go to Remi and you for mentoring me and being
patient with me learning the packaging process.
Remaining packages up for grabs:
- python-progressbar ( hasn't changed for ages, might be time to retire it)
- sphinx ( regular updates )
On 9 October 2014 15:55, S
I've got Sphinx... Will bump it at the end of the month when I get home.
On Oct 9, 2014 11:13 AM, "Christof Damian" wrote:
> Thanks Shawn.
>
> And more thanks also go to Remi and you for mentoring me and being
> patient with me learning the packaging process.
>
> Remaining packages up for grabs:
(reordering the citations!)
> > > Why should we ban weak dependencies if they really
> > > do nothing in YUM?
> >
> > We need a precise and detailed functional description about what these
> > "weak dependencies" are supposed to do.
>
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Pa
- Original Message -
> Most importantly, we need to update packaging guidelines to explain
> what are the semantic differences between these different tags. But
> that's a minor update.
That seems to be well enough covered upstream. (Well modulo “does Fedora
actually do what the upstream
- Original Message -
> The Fedora question would be not “what do the tags do” but “when is it
> appropriate to use Suggests, when Recommends, and when Requires”?
(And FWIW my take is that having this level of complexity in the dependency
system is a mistake that is making things complex f
On 10/8/14 8:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 08.10.2014 14:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
>> wrote:
>>> Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
[...]
>>> http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/ke
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Good idea! Thanks and done ...
In addition, http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies terminates
rather abruptly, with "or B Supplements". That should at least be "or
B Supplements A." Actually, there are a few other wording mistakes in
th
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
> [...]
> That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just repeated within
> our packaging guidelines IMHO).
From an rpm upstream point of view, we don't know much about what
those dependencies do. We simply relay the i
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> especially as we are taking the RPM-level control away from the users
> completely in cloud
How is that?
> and Atomic images already.
See:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2014-October/msg5.html
--
On 10/08/2014 12:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> This F21 change:
> http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
>
> has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
>
> Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
>
> Rpm in f21 and rawhide sees these in spec files and builds fin
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:05:03 +0200
Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
> > [...]
> > That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just
> > repeated within our packaging guidelines IMHO).
>
> From an rpm upstream point of view, we
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
collaboration trends in Fedora.
I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bu
On 10/08/2014 11:41 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Summary of changes:
>
> 58461a8... Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3 (*)
> 7ec9589... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
> f0aeace... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> we know about it, don't have any answer yet :-(
Okay, thanks for letting me know. I'd appreciate a note when you get
the problem resolved. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
- Original Message -
> From: "Christof Damian"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora PHP development team"
> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:12:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Giving away all of my packages
>
> Remaining packages up for grabs:
>
> - python-progress
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
>quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
>either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
>collabo
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2014 11:41 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> > Summary of changes:
> >
> > 58461a8... Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3 (*)
> > 7ec9589... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
> > f0a
On 10/09/2014 10:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:05:03 +0200
Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
[...]
That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just
repeated within our packaging guidelines IMHO).
From an
36 matches
Mail list logo
