Hi,
upstream asked us 6 months ago if it would be possible to rename
"rubygem-passenger" package to "passenger" and clean-up the package
little bit to match the progress Passenger did in last years.
The reason to do this is that Passenger is not real rubygem anymore and
supports more languag
Hi,
Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash? (And
probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can really call
the Fedora image official with all it's tags?)
We should probably also consider using Fedora Cloud SIG account on
github to push these image to
On 30 September 2014 02:09, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Who is using magnifying glasses to view icons?
>
> Icons are displayed far larger in GNOME Shell than in other desktop
> environments, and the difference between an SVG icon and a 256x256
Hello,I am trying to package
STLPlus (http://sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/";
target="_blank">sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/)
library for fedora. There are few doubts I have in mind regarding
packaging it.1. The library is dependent on another
project viz. 'makef
Pranav,
Can you please re-send the e-mail without all the unnecessary HTML tags?
Your e-mail is quite unreadable at the moment.
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 05:11 -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
> Hello,I am trying to package
> STLPlus (http://sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/";
> target="_bla
Hello,
I am trying to package STLPlus (
sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora. There
are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
1. The library is dependent on another project viz. 'makefiles' (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/makefiles/). Th
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 06:06 -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to package STLPlus
> (sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora.
> There are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
>
> 1. The library is dependent on another project viz.
> 'makef
On 09/29/2014 01:19 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Please put the actual validation into an external script,
> brp-desktop-file-validate or whatever. That way its consistent with the
> other similar things, easier to test-run outside rpmbuild and unlike
> inlining, has room for future growth.
Thanks
Hello all,
When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising
caution when downloading sources from pkgs.fedoraproject.org.
I've also s
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
> in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
> a popular external repository, require these functions.
>
> According to https://bugzilla.r
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
> I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
> While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising
> caution when d
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
> > in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
> > a popular external reposito
On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> # If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
>> if ! ls -A "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"/usr/share/applications/ 2>/dev/null; then
>> exit 0
>> fi
>
> That tests whether the directory exists, not whether it contains
> deskt
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:57 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> That might be a good reason, but it's not the one given at the start
> of this proposal, that was that larger icons are needed for the
> software centre (i.e. for applications to get included in the
> installer) due to higher resolution display
Greetings!
This time I'm sending "Accepted Changes 100% Complete" reminder a bit
earlier than usually as we still have quite a lot of work to do on
Changes and it's going to help other teams to participate in Changes
process earlier (aka Docs team etc.).
2014-10-14 Accepted Changes 100% Complete
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I think the software center and shell display icons at the same size,
> so
> it matters equally to both.
I would be smarter if I checked such facts BEFORE sending emails and not
immediately AFTER. The icons in Software are indeed smalle
On 1.10.2014 15:12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu,
Kalev Lember wrote:
> # If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
> if ! ls -A "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"/usr/share/applications/ 2>/dev/null; then
> exit 0
> fi
That tests whether the directory exists, not whether it contains
desktop files. If that's what you want, then
«if [ -d "$RPM_B
Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Kalev Lember wrote:
> >> # If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
> >> if ! ls -A "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"/usr/share/applications/ 2>/dev/null; then
> >>exit 0
> >> fi
> >
> > That tests whether the directory exis
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:06:44AM -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to package STLPlus (
> sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora. There
> are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
>
> 1. The library is dependent on another project viz.
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010 . Please see the following
pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructio
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:56:32AM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash? (And
> probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can really call the
> Fedora image official with all it's tags?)
Just to confirm, these 3 imag
On 10/01/2014 03:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
a popular external repository, require these func
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Richard Hughes
wrote:
> At the moment applications have to provide an icon >= 32x32px in size
> to be included in the AppStream metadata and shown in the software
> center. This is *tiny* on a HiDPI screen, so should I mandate that all
> applications ship a 64x64
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:59:52PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> So, at this point, I think I'm going to desubmit (is that a word?
> unsubmit?) my request for a second opinion and won't be pursuing
> this any further. Apologies for any wasted time, and thanks Nikos
> for explaining what havege i
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
>> I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
>> While it's most likely a minor i
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Václav Pavlín"
> Para: "Dennis Gilmore"
> CC: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Lokesh Mandvekar"
>
> Enviados: Miércoles, 1 de Octubre 2014 1:56:32
> Asunto: [Base] F21 Alpha Docker base image release
>
> Hi,
>
> Dennis, could you please b
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-10-01)
===
Meeting started by mattdm at 17:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-10-01/fesco.2014-10-01-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-10-01/fedora-meeting-1.2014-10-01-18.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> It's now retired in both F21 and master. Feel free to go ahead with the
> libinfinity builds.
thank you.
Rex, I prepared a new build for libqinfinity in the master branch, if
you point me to the SRPMs you would like to use for
Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>> It's now retired in both F21 and master. Feel free to go ahead with the
>> libinfinity builds.
>
> thank you.
>
> Rex, I prepared a new build for libqinfinity in the master branch, if
> you point me t
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 12:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
> will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
>
> Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
>
> 1) Upgrades from Fedora 20
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-10-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-10-02 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-10-02 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-10-02 1
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Towards the end of today's blocker review meeting, we decided it would be good
for us to have a another meeting this week to deal with the unusually large
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:56:32 +0200
Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash?
> (And probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can
> really call the Fedora image official with all
I'm sure I should file a ticket about this somewhere, but I'm not sure
where.
I was just signing up for yet another Fedora mailing list, and saw the
default image boxes at the bottom of the screen that indicate broken
links. Sure enough, I'm getting 404s for these URLs, all of which are
referred
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:21:08 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> I'm sure I should file a ticket about this somewhere, but I'm not sure
> where.
Infrastructure trac:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/newticket
> I was just signing up for yet another Fedora mailing list, and saw the
> defaul
Hi
Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell
and Android uses mksh. While this appears to have been done primary to
increase bo
Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram said:
> Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
> in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
> https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell
> and Android uses mksh. While this appe
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram said:
>> Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
>> in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash
On Wed, 01.10.14 22:39, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
> in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
> https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell
> and
On Wed, 01.10.14 22:19, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> One thing that might be a good topic for consideration: is there a
> reasonable way to allow different implementations to take the /bin/sh
> symlink? Could this be handled through the alternatives system, so that
> admins could choo
On 10/02/2014 08:33 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
If you change /bin/sh to dash, then you'll have to map two shell
binaries into memory (since the login shell is going to stay on bash),
hence the resource usage grows.
The login shell is a per-user configurable setting, thus the memory
resulti
43 matches
Mail list logo
