Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/
menhir - an LR(1) parser generator
It's a simple package, so will swap for something not over-complex.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my pr
Hi everyone,
I've just pushed update [0] to Python 2.7.8 in Rawhide
which backports Python3 SSL module into Python2, this
patch was created by upstream [1] and will be part of Python2
in the next release. This effort already discovered minor
issue in test_ssl.py [2] while scratch building.
Next s
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topic =
* Flock -- what we learnt, what needs to be done
* OpenFloor
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
13.06.2014 01:42, Adam Williamson пишет:
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 18:56 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within the
>> gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from the gcc
>> sources, and not packaged.
>>
>> Is
I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image:
Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
Is this on anyones radar already?
Dusty
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image:
>
> Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
>
> Is this on anyones radar already?
http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/2014/07/29/fedora-21-pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2014 04:14 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:37:13AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud
> > image:
> >
> > Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
> >
> > Is this on anyone
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 01:40:55 PM CEST, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/19/2014 04:14 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>> FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
>> irc.freenod
Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary files? I'd like
to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the whole
package.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 19.08.2014 15:01, Neal Becker wrote:
Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary files? I'd like
to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the whole
package.
Hi,
Look here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
Compose started at Tue Aug 19 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
- Original Message -
> If you experience such situations, the right approach is to contact the
> owner of the certificate (or the server), and ask them to get a
> replacement certificate, or to install a replacement certificate on
> their SSL/TLS server.
That’s the right thing to do of cou
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-08-19)
Meeting started by hhorak at 13:05:26 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-08-19/env-and-stacks.2014-08-19-13
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > If you experience such situations, the right approach is to contact the
> > owner of the certificate (or the server), and ask them to get a
> > replacement certificate, or to install a replacement certificat
Dne 19.8.2014 15:01, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
>
> On 19.08.2014 15:01, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary
>> files? I'd like
>> to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the
>> whole
>> package.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Look here: http:/
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an
> unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at
> least generally point to how to work around this if the certificate
> owner is not (sufficiently qui
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an
> > unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at
> > least generally point to how to work around this if the certifi
Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
> than a chroot, it prevents the attacker from making socket connections
> orexecuting his code, as his "playing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
ISC is working on new BIND 9.10 release which includes the seccomp
functionality. It can be turned on by configuring BIND before build with
"--enable-seccomp".
ISC asked me to kindly ask Fedora community if they would be willing to
test it. Cu
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 05:12:31 PM CEST, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
>> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
>> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
>> than a chroot, it prevents the attacker from makin
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12:31AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
> > That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
> > of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
> > than a chroot, it prevents the attacker fr
This is pretty much the same scenario as the last one I reported, namely
competing updates where the "wrong" update wins. Here's the blow by blow
account of what happened.
9 May 2014
mclasen submits update FEDORA-2014-6201 (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6201/vte3-0.34.9-2.f
user: pghmcfc changed point of contact of package: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
from: orphan to: pghmcfc on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package:
perl-DateTime-Format-Mail from: Approved to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131377
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|st...@silug.or
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:18:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
> http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/
> menhir - an LR(1) parser generator
It turns out this package already exists in Fedora :-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualiza
Yay, welcome Michael ;)
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to welcome our newest contributor, Michael Catanzaro.
> I've just sponsored him to the packager group.
>
> Michael is very active upstream in GNOME and does a lot of work on GNOME
> games suite. His first Fedora
On 08/19/2014 11:20 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12:31AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
>>> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
>>> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes furthe
Il 19/Ago/2014 17:10 "Tomas Hozza" ha scritto:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello.
>
> ISC is working on new BIND 9.10 release which includes the seccomp
> functionality. It can be turned on by configuring BIND before build with
> "--enable-seccomp".
>
> ISC asked me to
Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263
Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving
updates? Or only F21 and later?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
I've met an issue since last year, as many python2 packages generate
.so files finally with 775 set:
non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xxx.so 0775L
Is it suppose to be the default?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
dev
This is a minor release. For notable changes please see the upstream
release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.17_release_notes
Rawhide and the f21 branch have been updated. It should appear in updates
testing for the stable branches early next week.
El
34 matches
Mail list logo
