Re: Lots of /usr/lib64 rpaths returning

2014-08-12 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:11:17PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > How about adding this to the top of %check? > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/.libs I use "export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}". D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

RE: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread ottos
Since this topic is here. There is an error in Makefile when you do a make modules_install. It attempts to delete a directory with a delete file command. This occurs in two places. If you are fixing fix this problem. -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [

F-21 Branched report: 20140812 changes

2014-08-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Aug 12 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [NetworkManager-l2tp] NetworkManager-l2tp-0.9.8.7-1.fc21.armv7hl requires ppp = 0:2.4.6 [PyKDE]

rawhide report: 20140812 changes

2014-08-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Broken deps for i386 -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [NetworkManager-l2tp] NetworkManager-l2tp-0.9.8.7-1.fc22.i686 requires ppp = 0:2.4.6 [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) >= 0:1

File CPAN-Mini-1.111016.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

2014-08-12 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Mini: 1a6bb8f056f63266e1d6aeb7991b88ff CPAN-Mini-1.111016.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:29 AM, ottos wrote: > Since this topic is here. There is an error in Makefile when you do a make > modules_install. It attempts to delete a directory with a delete file > command. This occurs in two places. If you are fixing fix this problem. That doesn't explain m

RE: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread otto
-Original Message- From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 7:02 AM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: making custom kernels easier to build On Tue, Aug 12, 2

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-08-12)

2014-08-12 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '-MM-DD 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-08-12)

2014-08-12 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or run: > date -d '

Re: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:04 AM, otto wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 7:02 AM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subject:

are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread Dhiru Kholia
Hi, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags says that "Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags set in the system rpm configuration. Honoring means that the contents of that variable is used as the basis of the flags actually used by the c

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread David Howells
Dhiru Kholia wrote: > In Fedora, we recently enabled "-fstack-protector-strong" in system rpm > configuration - but are all packages using this enhanced hardening > feature? What's the performance overhead of enabling this for everything? David -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:26 +0200, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-) So first, this is great! However, the results.txt is very hard to use in order to check if maintainers need to do something. How about instead, splitting the results into

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > Initial scan results are available on the following URL, > > https://halfie.fedorapeople.org/flags-scanner/ > > > Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-) > Thanks for working on this. However the informati

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:01 schrieb David Howells: > Dhiru Kholia wrote: > >> In Fedora, we recently enabled "-fstack-protector-strong" in system rpm >> configuration - but are all packages using this enhanced hardening >> feature? > > What's the performance overhead of enabling this for everything?

Re: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:29 AM, ottos wrote: Since this topic is here. There is an error in Makefile when you do a make modules_install. It attempts to delete a directory with a delete file command. This occurs in two places. If you are fixing fix this problem. Typically, something like t

RE: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread ottos
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Przemek Klosowski Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:02 PM To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: making custom kernels easier to build On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:29 AM, ottos <

Re: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, ottos wrote: > > > > > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Przemek > Klosowski > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:02 PM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Subject: Re: making custom kerne

RE: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread ottos
-Original Message- From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:43 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: making custom kernels easier to build On Tue, Aug 12,

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - alon

2014-08-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not int

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-12 Thread Dhiru Kholia
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:26 +0200, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-) > > So first, this is great! Thanks :-) > However, the results.txt is very hard to use in order to check if > maintainers n

Re: making custom kernels easier to build

2014-08-12 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Aug 12, 2014, at 8:04, "otto" wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 7:02 AM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subje