On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
>> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>> Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network
>> environment, having differing versions of UID_MIN (where recompilation
>> is r
Am 10.07.2014 09:37, schrieb Al Dunsmuir:
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
>>> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>>> Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network
>>> environment, having differin
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> A non-API related question...
>
> Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory
> with "magical" effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of existing
> system users which carry more complex semantics.
Perhaps look at
Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :)
Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you there
tomorrow!
Thanks & regards, Phil
On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
That sounds great Michal. If you could join us tomorrow at our meeting
at 15:00 UTC on #fedora-m
So anyone that is using it to build their own packages, if you could check it
in the next three weeks.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 12:46 AM, William wrote:
> Under what conditions are these two files created / touched?
When systemd-sysusers is run.
> When I install a package and add a file to this sysuser directory, is
> only that user added to passwd and shadow?
The answer to this is pretty simp
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this
> process, going by the commit:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ddclient.git/commit/?id=f741436ca38fd6c36ffbfbb26b3131b278657faa
>
> but it wasn't listed in
Compose started at Thu Jul 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the
>> specific net install CD you're asking about. This will not be an
>> *offi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 02:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on
> what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide.
>
> If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain
> packages tracke
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
>>> for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
>>
>> it was submitted early today,
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Thu, 10.07.14 08:17, Oron Peled (o...@actcom.co.il) wrote:
>
>
> A non-API related question...
>
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 01:49:41 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Please understand that we are not duplicating "adduser" here. Already in
> > the name of the tool we wanted to make clear thtat t
Am 10.07.2014 14:30, schrieb Rex Dieter:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
>>>
>>> it was submitted early
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:00:12AM +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :)
>
> Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you
> there tomorrow!
Sure, will be there.
>
> Thanks & regards, Phil
Michal
>
> On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knir
On Thu, 10.07.14 17:16, William (will...@firstyear.id.au) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > A non-API related question...
>
> >
> > Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory
> > with "magical" effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of
On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
> > have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
> > 20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I try use kde-redhat and
Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>>> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
>>> have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
>>> 20 , with k
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2014-07-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
>
> For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
> report of t
Agenda:
- Introduction of Benedikt Morbach, intern working on buildreq
reduction (and potential other stuff if time permits ;))
- Talk with Michal Sekletar as candidate for WG
- Vaclav Pavlin presenting minimal Docker image for Fedora (133MB)
- Open floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp
On Qui, 2014-07-10 at 15:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> >>> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
> >>> have 3 repos is
On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the
specific net install CD
Hi,
I intend to upgrade OpenSceneGraph to 3.2.1 (Jul 4th) on rawhide.
This change will introduce SONAME bumps in OpenSceneGraph-provided
libraries and thus is likely to introduce broken package dependencies.
I intend to take care about these and to launch rebuilds where necessary.
Depending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 09:53 AM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400,
Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for branched
this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package (and possibly
the release packages) as normally we want updates enabled, but if there
isn't going to be an updates repo for a while, then we'll need to
disable it
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora
and, optionally, enable updates-testing:
sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing
The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty
repos created for both update
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:30:27AM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Hi, for Atomic I'd like to investigate the new systemd-sysusers, so I
> > wrote up a Change:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemdSysusers
>
> A move to something more declarative m
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html
> That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The
> Fedora Server netinstall wouldn't be producing a non-productized
> result, w
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Two examples from the top of my head:
> > * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it)
> > * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have similar use (chroot into ~ftp)
But these aren't really usable with
Hi all,
does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages
currently present in the Fedora Jam audio spin?
We will be discussing names further within the music creation SIG /
fedora-music mailing list soon, but Audio Production or Music Creation
are two that immediately
I'd be game
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages
> currently present in the Fedora Jam audio
On 07/10/2014 05:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html
>> That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The
>> Fedora Server netinstall w
On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily picking
from fedora-release-[standard|cloud|server|workstation] to install if
you just update. (This is in large part because th
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> sssd-1.12.0-1.fc21
> --
> * Wed Jul 09 2014 Jakub Hrozek - 1.12.0-1
> - New upstream release 1.12.0
> - https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.12.0
The previous version was 1.12.0-4.fc21.beta2.
$ rpmdev
Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's
rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this
morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at least
a few fc22 builds.
I'll be more worried if this persists in tomorrow's rawhide, but
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:18:23 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's
> rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this
> morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at
> least a few fc22 builds.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:03:05 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for
> branched this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package
> (and possibly the release packages) as normally we want updates
> enabled, but if there isn't going
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote:
> On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
>> fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily
>> picking from fedora-release-[stan
On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Basically, in order to swap out the productized and non-productized
> release packages, it's not actually as simple as 'yum swap
> fedora-release-standard fedora-release-server'. The way the dependency
> processing works in yum and dnf will general
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:25:48 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We will get mash fixed today and tomorrow rawhide should return to
normal.
Thanks for taking care of this and the updates/updates-testing repos.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 12:45 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Basically, in order to swap out the productized and
>> non-productized release packages, it's not actually as simple as
>> 'yum swap fedora-release-stan
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> around, but still -- could we, when the SSSD interface is available,
> call out from systemd-sysusers to t
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:44:29PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> > still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> > around, but still -- could we, when th
On Thu, 10.07.14 12:44, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> > still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> > around, but still -- could we, when t
On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote:
On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrari
I've a system that's zeroing out .bash_history at every reboot. Is this
happening to everyone? Intended?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:35 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this
>
> > process, going by the commit:
> >
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ddclient.git/commit/?id=f74143
I just thought it'd be good to alert Fedora 21 and 22 users to this
issue.
Some major changes were introduced to the 'ceph' package in the 0.81.0-3
build, and maintained in the 0.81.0-4 build. These builds were done for
all current releases, but not submitted as updates to any stable
release, so l
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages
> manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but
> it'd be best if the packages were fixed up, and I figured I'd let folks
> know about the pr
I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual
machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a
'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
> On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGN
Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated.
> >
> > * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a
> > data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
>
> Also, /etc/group and /etc/gshadow.
>
> > Under what conditions are these two files created / touched?
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:35 -0700, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > Two examples from the top of my head:
> > > * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it)
> > > * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have s
We're currently working on a number of things to improve input devices in
libinput - the future input stack for wayland developers. What we need
is data to base our assumptions on, so I'm hereby asking the list to provide
some.
If you don't have a touchpad, please disregard this email.
If you're o
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:05:29AM +0930, William wrote:
>
> Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated.
>
> > >
> > > * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a
> > > data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
> >
> > Also, /etc/group and /etc/gsha
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:00 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual
> machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a
> 'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use?
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/dev
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages
manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but
it'd be best if the packages
55 matches
Mail list logo
