Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): 2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or systemd snippets therein) will be responsible for the creation and maintenance of /etc/issue, /etc/os-release and /etc/fedora-release-product (note: there is no $ there. That's the lite

free seats in Env and Stacks WG - volunteers wanted

Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in Fedora yet. The whole statement can be found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document There is missing Atomic and/or Docke

Review Swap

Hi, I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a favour, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689 Thanks. Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 18:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, Hi Christopher, > I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a > favour, > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689 I've taken it up. Can you please review "vit" in return? It's a really quick rev

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I've taken it up. Can you please review "vit" in return? It's a really > quick review too :) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112072 No problem. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing l

Re: Heads-up on rpm 4.12 coming to rawhide soon

On 06/30/2014 04:27 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 30.6.2014 15:14, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 06/30/2014 03:48 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 06/30/2014 03:12 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Interesting, it breaks Ruby build it seems: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7090194 Not sure

Re: Fedora 21 Changes Freeze in two weeks - 2014-07-08

- Original Message - > Greetings! > Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than > 2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is > also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date. The Fedora Changes Freeze is now set to 2014-07-08, so it's the same as that

Re: free seats in Env and Stacks WG - volunteers wanted

On Út 1. červenec 2014, 11:31:35 CEST, Marcela Maslanova wrote: Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in Fedora yet. The whole statement can be found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stack

Re: Heads-up on rpm 4.12 coming to rawhide soon

Dne 1.7.2014 12:56, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 06/30/2014 04:27 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 30.6.2014 15:14, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 06/30/2014 03:48 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 06/30/2014 03:12 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Interesting, it breaks Ruby build it seems: http://koji.fedorapr

Re: Review swaps

Hi Sandro, On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 15:50, Sandro Mani wrote: > On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >Would anyone like to swap reviews? > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 > > > >elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalu

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/2014 04:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >> 2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or >> systemd snippets therein) will be responsible for the creation >> and maintenance of /etc

Re: fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

Dne 1.7.2014 14:37, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/2014 04:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): 2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or systemd snippets therein) will be responsibl

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Hubert Plociniczak (fas: hubert)

2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! > As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his > private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only > package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/

Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

Hello, Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback. How will it work? It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will watch dependency updates and will (scratch) rebuild packages in Koji af

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:35:20 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:04 +0200 > drago01 wrote: > > > Why? > > My understanding of the process as it exists: > > Download drpm. > Take drpm contents + old package files installed local

Re: Cc: on dead packages

On 06/30/2014 07:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said: >> Apparently, people can still file bugs for dead packages: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114180 >> >> And I (and many others) get CC:ed on those bugs files, with >> no possibility to remo

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:01:04 -0500 Jon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > Personally I would just say don't make delta-rpms for i386 and arm > > or just have deltarpm=1 on those architectures

Summer 2014 FESCo Special Election

We have three open seats on FESCo, the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. The policy for filling open seats states that we first check with the runners-up from the previous election; as they have declined, the policy is for FESCo to select replacements. We've decided that an open election is th

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

Hi Michael, it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on this library and if some of them fail, notify it's maintainer(s) and the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >alliance chitlesh, tnorth > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945 I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945 > > I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also t

kde-4.13.x update for f20

KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed release), extending the same rationale per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Update_policy There have been kde-4.13.1 packages available for test

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 10:13 -0400, Michael Simacek wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for > Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback. > > How will it work? > It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for > Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed > release), extending the same rationale per > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Update_polic

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > > >> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

[ACTION REQUIRED][FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v4

The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_packag

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not int

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Hubert Plociniczak (fas: hubert)

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400 Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov : > > Hello All! > > As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in > > his private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for > > the only package Hubert maintained -

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Hubert Plociniczak (fas: hubert)

2014-07-01 21:58 GMT+04:00 Kevin Fenzi : > On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400 > Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> 2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov : >> > Hello All! >> > As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in >> > his private email). So it's time to change a poit of co

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 19:19 +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Sounds a lot like what openSUSE's Open Build Service does. I think > they > automatically trigger rebuilds of dependees when a provide they depend > on goes away due to a rebuild, so SONAME bumps are a breeze. Yes, soname bumps are none

Review swaps

The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the reviews

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is > automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that. I've always found it really strange how so many people talk about "rebuilding" for soname bumps. The

Retiring fuse-smb package

Hi, I plan to retire fuse-smb which allows to mount SMB/Samba shares as local directories before F21 is branched (2014-07-08). There have been no new versions since 2008 and the maintainer is not going to fix problem with crashes related to multi threading issues in libsmbclient 3.2+. There had b

Realted to "Fedora Release Engineering" is this OK?!!

Hi every one , This commit add number after %{?dist} .. is this OK !! http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=c2f0d77aba7a2b745886654c42c943f6a9c1a4b7 See full package name http://fr2.rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/fedora/devel/rawhide/src/g/gnulib-0-8.20140504git.fc21.1.src.html R

5tFTW: "Winning", FESCo election, Workstation To-Dos, Bugspad, and CentOS & EPEL (2014-07-01)

Reposted from . Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week. It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links to each. Here are the five

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance. Is there any point in blktap? I thought, and I might be wrong here, that it's functionality had been folded back into xen. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-07-02)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2014-07-02 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: Realted to "Fedora Release Engineering" is this OK?!!

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:02 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > Hi every one , > > This commit add number after %{?dist} .. is this OK !! > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=c2f0d77aba7a2b745886654c42c943f6a9c1a4b7 Yes, it's fine. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

Colin Walters writes: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is >> automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that. > > I've always found it really strange how so many people talk about > "

Re: Realted to "Fedora Release Engineering" is this OK?!!

Yes, it's fine. If you want to avoid such bump you shouldn't use %tag, just fill in the number. I couldn't see the reason of using this one-off macro. Release: %{tag}.%{gitdate}git%{?dist} to Release: 8.%{gitdate}git%{?dist} Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- de

Re: Review swaps

Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121 2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell (This package is pretty easy as it only contains a manpage) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Fwd: [Bug 1114497] New: odb package missing gcc-plugin

The simple solution to this is for me to just rebuild against 4.8.3, but upstream said that in Debian they package the GCC plugins in /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y/plugin instead of /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y.z/plugin so that it doesn't break when there are minor version upgrades like this. Is doing something lik

Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages

On 2014-07-01, jpac...@redhat.com wrote: > it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps > in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was > to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on > this library and if some of them fa