Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote: >> Another source of Java build failures may be that the >> javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven >> dep fragments should live; see >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Best (cleanest?) conditional formation in a spec file for distro version and arch

My package freecad has a missing optional dependency on RHEL 6, ppc64 ONLY so for that build I need to drop a "Requires:" The dependency doesn't build on ppc64 w/ older gcc and is not easily fixable so I decided just to drop the optional dependency for that build and arch, but how to accomplish th

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-18)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-18)

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a

Re: Best (cleanest?) conditional formation in a spec file for distro version and arch

On 18/06/14 13:56, Richard Shaw wrote: My package freecad has a missing optional dependency on RHEL 6, ppc64 ONLY so for that build I need to drop a "Requires:" The dependency doesn't build on ppc64 w/ older gcc and is not easily fixable so I decided just to drop the optional dependency for that

Re: Best (cleanest?) conditional formation in a spec file for distro version and arch

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > Does this work? > > %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 6 || "%{_arch}" != "ppc64" > Requires: python-pivy > %endif > Hmm... I think it would block the requires on epel7 as well though which works fine (newer gcc) Thanks, Richard -- devel

Re: Best (cleanest?) conditional formation in a spec file for distro version and arch

I think what I need to do is stop worrying about the NOT conditional and be OK with doing nothing inside a if TRUE conditional... %if 0%{?rhel} <= 6 && "%{_arch}" = "ppc64" # Do nothing %else Requires: python-pivy %endif Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:/

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-11)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 == #fedora-meeting: fesco == Meeting started by abadger1999 at 17:02:46 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-06-11/fesco.2014-06-11-17.02.log.html . Meetin

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-18)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/18/2014 09:12 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the >> FESCo meeting Wednesday at

Network UPS Tools - almost 2 months updates-candidate -> updates broken

- 2.7.2 - updates candidate: Information for build nut-2.7.2-1.fc20 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=512594 Completed Wed, 23 Apr 2014 ... Tagsf20-updates-candidate Waiting for Godot? - 2.7.1 - current updates: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7

Re: Network UPS Tools - almost 2 months updates-candidate -> updates broken

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:32:48AM +0200, poma wrote: > > - 2.7.2 - updates candidate: > Information for build nut-2.7.2-1.fc20 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=512594 > Completed Wed, 23 Apr 2014 ... > Tags f20-updates-candidate > > Waiting for Godot? Waiting for te

Re: Is redis orphaned?

I'm asking the original owner of redis to see why he chose tcmalloc as memory allocator, as I couldn't find any strong opinion to introduce gperf dependency just because of some negligible(not sure, though) performance improvement. Moreover, jemalloc is the default option for redis on Linux. Also

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-18)

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:07:40AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wik

Re: rawhide report: 20140618 changes

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > antlr3-3.5-1.fc21 > - > * Tue Jun 17 2014 Michael Simacek - 3.5-1 > - Update to upstream version 3.5 > > * Tue Jun 17 2014 Michael Simacek - 3.4-18 > - Specfile cleanup > > * Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineerin

Re: rawhide report: 20140618 changes

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, wrote: > You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has > been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are > being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at > test-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org. Rules for cross

Re: Is redis orphaned?

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I'm asking the original owner of redis to see why he chose tcmalloc as > memory allocator, as I couldn't find any strong opinion to introduce > gperf dependency just because of some negligible(not sure, though) > performance improvement.

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > libguestfs uses hfsplus-tools in order to provide some HFS+ filesystem > > features (mainly for Mac filesystems and .DMG files). We can remove > > this functionality from the Fedora version, but of course it means > > people won't be able

pam_script review

Hi All, I have submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110913 As indicated in the ticket this is my first packaging attempt so I am looking for a sponsor as well. i would obviously like to learn more about packaging and help maintain packages in addition to my submission. So if

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-06-19 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-06-19 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-06-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2014-06-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2014-06-19 1

Re: pam_script review

Hi Jason, On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:53 +, Jason Taylor wrote: > Hi All, > > I have submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110913 I've added some comments. If noone else steps in, I can do a formal review as well. > As indicated in the ticket this is my first packaging attemp

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On 06/18/2014 02:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how spurious the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code review): http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/hfsplus-tools.git/plain/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch That's right kids, the C89

Summary of Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-06-18)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-06-18) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:54 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-06-18/fesco.2

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:24 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 06/18/2014 02:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how > > spurious the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code > > review): > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/hfsp

Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud,workstation,server} subpackages

We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really close to the time when we _need_ it. See ... as Dennis says, we have not yet decided how to differentiate the different Fedora products. I suggest that we have fedora-release-{work

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:16:49PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > libguestfs uses hfsplus-tools in order to provide some HFS+ filesystem > > > features (mainly for Mac filesystems and .DMG files). We can remove > > > this functionality

Re: rawhide report: 20140618 changes

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:01:03 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, > wrote: > > You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message > > has been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages > > are being rejected in error, contact the mailing lis

Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not

Re: Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud, workstation, server} subpackages

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really close to > the time when we _need_ it. See > ... as Dennis says, we > have not yet decided how to differentiate the differe

Re: Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud, workstation, server} subpackages

On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > [snip] > > I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives > system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the > variant in either the VERSION field (VERSION="21 (Cloud)") or a new > os-release field which

Re: Attempting to contact three unresponsive maintainers

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/ > Point of contact: 39 > Co-maintainer: 254 > Watched:0 We're reshuffling Søren's packages (in a RHEL ownership sense)

Re: Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud,workstation,server} subpackages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:15:03 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really > close to the time when we _need_ it. See > ... as Dennis > says, we hav

Re: Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud, workstation, server} subpackages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:55:02 -0500 Jon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really > > close to the time when we _need_ it. See > >