Re: rawhide report: 20140608 changes

This is largely my fault, but I think I have fixed all of: > ... requires libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so with a new build of ghc-text and most of > ... requires libHSnetwork-2.4.1.2-ghc7.6.3.so with a ghc-network build, which I believe leaves just 13 packages linked against the wron

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script tel

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. > > You can see the current list o

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 Neil Horman wrote: > > > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. > If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS, > or is it too late to remove the package from F21

Orphaning piccolo2d

I don't have the time and energy to maintain piccolo2d and it's no longer needed by my packages - thus orphaned now. Feel free to pick it up if you want to keep it in. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

awstats license change

Hello all, awstats-7.2 upgraded license to GPLv3+. awstats-7.2-1.fc21 is being built for Rawhide right now. Regards, Petr -- Petr Lautrbach signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Web Assets

Dne 30.5.2014 03:03, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a): On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained different/modified version of upstream JS files. AFAICT they're both fine. rubygem-uglifier includes the main uglify

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 13 packages were orphaned - R-bigmemory [master] was orphaned by spot Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:19:09 +0200 Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2014-06-08, 13:41 GMT, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > I have the same problem for quite a while already: > > http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pingou/subsurface/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/build-17727.log > > Mee too > > http://copr

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the > mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly wrong in java land: E

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

- Original Message - > From: "Adam Jackson" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update > > On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We merged in the side tags on May 27, and

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Adam Jackson" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM >> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update >> >> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wro

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

Dne 1.6.2014 11:24, Till Maas napsal(a): The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide > java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so > it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages): > > # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel > java-1.7.0-

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? I notice there has not been a successful build since 2013-06-12 (approximately 1 year

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 > Neil Horman wrote: > > > > > > > Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. > > If I do so sooner rather than later,

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > > > On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till

hdf5 updated to 1.8.13

hdf5 was updated to 1.8.13 during the rebuild - sorry for not announcing this, but I forgot I had staged this. All packages that use it need to be rebuilt. I'll try to get to them but I'm on vacation at the moment and my time is limited. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager

Re: Save everybody some surprises in Fedora 22!

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > Hello, > > The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. > We're wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF > that they have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've > put together a very

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > > On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: >

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

El jun 8, 2014 10:53 PM, "Eric Smith" escribió: > IANAL, but multiple lawyers >have told me that it is generally >a bad idea to go looking for >patents, at least in the US. If >they're brought to your >attention, you should probably >do whatever is necessary to >avoid them, but you shouldn't > se

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Monday, June 9, 2014, 12:08:13 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 >> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400

Re: Save everybody some surprises in Fedora 22!

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. >> We're wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF >> that they have got rec

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax > > Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? > > I notice the

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly > wrong in java land: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException : > Unsuppor

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Isaac Cortés González < w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, should I just clone the git repositories and build from those raw > sources? > Sounds reasonable to me. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:07:14PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax > > Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? It's requ

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Another source of Java build failures may be that the > javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven > dep fragments should live; see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919. I believe that this is a documentation bu

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

Kẏra riseup.net> writes: > Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes: > > On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote: > > > First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is > > > stunning. The difference is huge. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > One thing that I have been waiting for is separate

rawhide report: 20140609 changes

Rawhide has finished composing today, but the report is about 3.4MB and I'm not sure how usefull reading every package changed is to all the subscribers of this list, so I dropped it. Summary: Added Packages: 6 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 13994 Size of added packages: 4804582 (4.6 M) S

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax > > > > > > > Just to be c

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 > > "Richard W.M. Jones"

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one? Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else will crash into the same issue when they dare to build something that needs

Self introduction: Dave Love

I've just submitted my first package, the procenv tool for showing the process environment: I have more to offer which are relevant to HPC or other research computing. There's a collection of specs for packages I've installed at

Nonresponsive package maintainer: crystal

Hi, I sent a message about this about six months ago too, and the situation hasn't changed since then: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-December/192617.html I've tried additional ways to contact the maintainer since then, as noted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

On 2014-06-09, 14:21 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This issue should be fixed now. Thanks a lot. Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Nonresponsive package maintainer: crystal

+1 from me. Chitlesh is inactive now, we should conside orphan all of his packages. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

cgnslib seems to be missing in pkgdb for some reason. Original Message Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:43:06 + (UTC) From: mailer-dae...@fedoraproject.org (Mail Delivery System) To: or...@fedoraproject.org This is the mail system at ho

Re: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:48:23PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > cgnslib seems to be missing in pkgdb for some reason. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cgnslib/ Though search for all should have returned it, I'm fixing that bug. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproj

Orphaning SteGUI and fprint_demo

Hi, I am orphaning SteGUI and fprint_demo in rawhide. Both are currently FTBFS and both are pretty much dead-upstream afaik. SteGUI Graphical front-end to Steghide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/SteGUI/ fprint_demo Demo of the fprint drivers https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:22:57PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > I have a Fedora 20 ppc64 Mac right next to my feet here that is > > definitely booting using yaboot. > > Then you did not install using Fedora 20. F20/Rawhide fro

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one? > > Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it > doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else