On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0].
>
> There was so much changes in spec file, patches.
> * dropped devel-doc, because couldn't find docs in tarballs (mercurial'ed)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rena
There is a problem >>
Packages of rawhide not all stable !!!
we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages .
Mosaab
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
Hi
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 6:53 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> There is a problem >>
>
> Packages of rawhide not all stable !!!
> we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages .
>
We cannot achieve stability without user feedback. If you like a rolling
release model, feel free to participate.
Am 08.06.2014 12:53, schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
> There is a problem >>
>
> Packages of rawhide not all stable !!!
> we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages
Fedora is no rolling release distribution
it was never and likely will never be
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0].
>>
>> There was so much changes in spec file, patches.
>> * dropped devel-doc, because couldn't find docs in tarb
I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to
fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download...
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapro
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to
> fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download...
can you provide link?
> Thanks,
> Richard
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 05:36:45PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to
> > fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download...
> can you provide link?
I hav
Dear mailing list,
Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into
OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0).
Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a long time ago but
does not fixed
At present I have more trust in the OpenBSD guys than OpenSSL based upon
their previous work. So I'd prefer to move to LibreSSL once stable
Just my 2c worth.
Jon
On 8 Jun 2014 15:21, "Álvaro Castillo" wrote:
> Dear mailing list,
>
> Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability
Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo:
> Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into
> OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0).
> Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a
Am 08.06.2014 16:42, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo:
>> Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into
>> OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0).
>> Som
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 03:21:04PM +0100, Álvaro Castillo wrote:
> However, OpenBSD was created a fork called LibreSSL try to solve this
> issues. Should Fedora to move LibreSSL (http://www.libressl.org/)? Or
> still use OpenSSL and wait what's bug could be found today, or
> tomorrow, or few months
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo:
>> Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into
>> OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r
Hi,
On 06/08/2014 03:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0].
>>>
>>> There was so much changes in spec file, patche
That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either.
Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried
about OpenSSL bugs
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:21, Álvaro Castillo wrote:
>
> Dear mailing list,
>
> Few days was built an patch to solv
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 12:21:08PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either.
>
> Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried
> about OpenSSL bugs
We've tried that: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
On 2014-06-08, 13:41 GMT, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I have the same problem for quite a while already:
> http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pingou/subsurface/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/build-17727.log
Mee too
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mcepl/xiphos-3.2.1/
Matěj
--
devel maili
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 12:21:08PM -0400, Paul wrote:
That bug was not found by the rampaging libressl people either.
Perhaps moving from OpenSSL to NSS would be better if you are that worried
about OpenSSL bugs
We've tried that: http://fedoraproject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compose, and sync out to the mirrors
The tagging script t
Il 08/06/2014 20:20, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 08/06/2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
compo
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land
>> in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to
>> compose, and sync out to the mirrors
>>
>> The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a
>> very large number of fa
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:20:32 +0200
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
> hi
> thanks for your work!
>
> now i have some problems for rebuild my packages
>
> DEBUG util.py:331: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
> '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2154600-393050/root/',
> 'groupinstall', 'srpm
Hi,
I getting the usual:
Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (58, 'SSL peer rejected
your certificate as revoked.')
when running 'fedpkg new-sources', even though I've re-run
fedora-packager-setup. Is there a problem, or I am missing something?
Thanks,
Jon
--
devel mailing list
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 19:52:21 +0100
Jon Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I getting the usual:
>
> Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (58, 'SSL peer
> rejected your certificate as revoked.')
Note that you can only have one valid cert at a time.
>
> when running 'fedpkg new-sources', even th
Hi,
That showing:
fedora-cert -v
Verifying Certificate
cert expires: 2014-10-15
CRL Checking not implemented yet
Which looks good to me, unless I'm misreading this.
Cheers,
Jon
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 19:52:21 +0100
> Jon Kent wrote:
>
> >
It's not stable yet, and it's not ported to other operating systems.
the folks over at OpenBSD do import some powerful security tools and
keep them clean, such SSH. (No, they didn't writ it, they ported it
and maintain the core code.)
But that means it's unlikely to work well on other operating sy
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:37:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> lvm2's spec isn't very friendly to the rpmdev-bumpspec script that the
> mass rebuild uses, so it is a bit messed up. They seem to redefine
> 'release' for every subpackage and the bumpspec script tries to
> increment all of them and the vers
Hi,
Sorted it. Instead of fedora-packager-setup I used fedora-cert to update
my certificate and it all working now.
Cheers,
jon
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Jon Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That showing:
> fedora-cert -v
> Verifying Certificate
> cert expires: 2014-10-15
> CRL Checking not impl
The srpm buildroot was still broken, this time by rpkg.
There was a rpkg build 2014-03-24 10:05:16 with a upstream version bump,
but it was untagged before going out in a rawhide compose and wasn't
ever fixed. Then the mass rebuild built it and landed it in the
buildroot.
If you commit things t
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
> >> Till Maas wrote:
>
> >> > yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2,
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-06-09
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again soon! There's nothing urgent right now, but we
skipped last week so I figured
So it's more a reason of manpower than any other thing. The question would
be: is there any to accomplish this task?
I can look for any "patented" or closed source software and if any of them
are critical to build the SDK and NDK. Also I'll ask to the Replicant
project for any hint/tip on this.
El
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
>
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Isaac Cortés González <
w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can look for any "patented" or closed source software
>
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea to
go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your
36 matches
Mail list logo
