Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

On 05/29/2014 11:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform for Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons of binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this acceptable? No. /usr/bin is not supp

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote: I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282 Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix? I think FPC (and/or FES

Giving up freetalk, redet and redet-doc

Hello everybody, I am going to give up ownership of the following packages: - freetalk - redet - redet-doc I don't have any interest in them these days and even less time to look after them. Please pick them up if you want to. Thanks, Debarshi -- It has its possibilities but I am bound by

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:25:28AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/29/2014 10:28 PM, Tim St Clair wrote: > >I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282 > > > >Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reason

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Depending on what these files actually are (I don't know anything about > this package), installing them to %{_libexecdir} or %{libdir}/ > might be advisable. IMHO, %{_libexecdir}/salome/ is the best place. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On 29 May 2014 14:43, Till Maas wrote: > eclipse-subclipse orphan, > kdaniel, swagiaal > This affects some of my packages, taking. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

What happened to xlwt?

Hi, pkgdb knows a package called xlwt, but there is no repository for it. What happened to it? Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

On 05/30/2014 12:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: Depending on what these files actually are (I don't know anything about this package), installing them to %{_libexecdir} or %{libdir}/ might be advisable. IMHO, %{_libexecdir}/salome/ is the best place. Absolutly - The %{_libex

action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

Hi, rubygem-cloudservers is currently retired in packagedb but not blocked in koji/dead-packaged. python-lamson is dead-packaged but not retired or blocked. Both packages are dependencies for other packages and therefore cannot be just completely retired. FYI: If you got this e-mail directly, you

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily packaging. The default CFLAGS cause clang to fail 'out of the gate'. Given the popularity rise in the compiler, and the increase # of open tickets upstream around this issue, I think it prudent that we address. Not to chan

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:03 -0400, Tim St Clair wrote: > I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily > packaging. > > The default CFLAGS cause clang to fail 'out of the gate'. Given the > popularity rise in the compiler, and the increase # of open tickets > upstream arou

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 18:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl, > > caillon, caolanm, glisse, > >

pvm packaging guidelines violations?

First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm please step up! I only need it as a dependency. While fixing the build for rawhide due to a tcl/tk update I had to look at the spec file and it was horrifying (ok, I'm exaggerating a bit). The sources are extracted directly

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 15:43 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > xorg-x11-drv-apm orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl, > xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl, > xorg-x11-drv-glintorphan, airlied, ajax, alexl, > xorg-x1

Re: What happened to xlwt?

Hi. According to pkgdb - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xlwt/ it has been orphaned. 30.05.2014 15:55, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > pkgdb knows a package called xlwt, but there is no repository for it. > What happened to it? > > Regards > Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:11 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm > please step up! I only need it as a dependency. > > While fixing the build for rawhide due to a tcl/tk update I had to look at > the spec file and it was horrifyin

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:11 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm > please step up! I only need it as a dependency. > > While fixing the build for rawhide due to a tcl/tk update I had to look at > the spec file and it was horrifying

Re: Packaging: bin subfolder

On 30.05.2014 14:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 05/30/2014 12:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: Depending on what these files actually are (I don't know anything about this package), installing them to %{_libexecdir} or %{libdir}/ might be advisable. IMHO, %{_libexecdir}/salome/

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:11 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm > please step up! I only need it as a dependency. What package are you referring to? # repoquery --whatrequires pvm pvm-gui-0:3.4.6-5.fc20.x86_64 # repoquery --what

Re: action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

Hi On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > rubygem-cloudservers is currently retired in packagedb but not blocked > in koji/dead-packaged. python-lamson is dead-packaged but not retired > or blocked. Both packages are dependencies for other packages and > therefore cannot b

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:11 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: > >> First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm >> please step up! I only need it as a dependency. > > What package are you referring to? I co-maintain

Re: action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:22:43PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Till Maas wrote: > For the record, lamson was dropped due to > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972251 > > Lamson was originally packaged for askbot which powers > http://ask.fedora

Re: action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

Hi On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > > Thank you for the information. I retired it together with lastuser, the > third dependent package. Btw. it is helpful to specify such details in > the dead.package file. > I was

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

Il 30/05/2014 11:03, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto: > >Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix? > > I think FPC (and/or FESCO) should decide on whether we want to > allow/disallow using clang for official Fedora rpms.

Re: action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:22:09PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > Thank you for the information. I retired it together with lastuser, the > > third dependent package. Btw. it is helpful to specify such details in > > the dead.package file. >

Re: fedoras default cflags & clang

Tim St Clair wrote: > I'm primarily referring to development compilation, not necessarily > packaging. Non-RPM compilation shouldn't be ending up with distro CFLAGS at all. (They're called RPM_OPT_FLAGS for a reason.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

Susi Lehtola wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: >> 2. Should this package go through a re-review? > > Not according to the policy, no. > > The package has been in Fedora the whole time, and the maintainers are > supposed to keep the spec files up-to-date with Fedora policies. It was supposed to go th

Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

Ken Dreyer wrote: I co-maintain pvm with Richard because it's a dependency for mplayer in RPM Fusion. If we could build mplayer without pvm support, I would certainly be all for that. pvm isn't a runtime requirement of mplayer and it isn't listed as a build requirement in the spec file. "rpm

Re: action needed for python-lamson and rubygem-cloudservers

Hi On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > The process is described here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > Is this what you wanted? The message can be specified on the command > line with fedpkg retire. It is not possible to do this via a we