Hello all,
I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
this error
DEBUG util.py:282:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-5/getPackage/krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2.i386.rpm:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
DEBUG util.py:282: Trying oth
On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:16:25 +0200
Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
> this error
>
> DEBUG util.py:282:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-5/getPackage/krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
> packages (an
- Original Message -
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>
> pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
> commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm
As we dropped last weeks meeting early due to low attendance we're going
to cover the same topics this week again:
Agenda:
- Follow up / status update merge reviews
- Open floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| F
Hi,
fuse-encfs does not use proper encryption and upstream was not very
active recently. Therefore I decided to orphan it on Fedora and EPEL. If
someone is interested in fixing it, please take it. Otherwise it will be
retired eventually.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> > policy t
I don't have the time nor to will to deal with it anymore.
Master is orphan now, feel free to pick it up. If noone does it in a week I'll
deprecate the package.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
%{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both
have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT
compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to
rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like so:
libeclmin.a(alloc_2.o): In function `init_a
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:12:11AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> > into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
> >
> > pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fe
Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, mpqcare... )
marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct?
As a chemist I'm very concerned about that.
No luck contacting carllibpst to ask.
--
*Henrique C. S. Junior*
Q
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
apache-commons-logging
apacheds
avalon-logkit
azureus
bookkeeper
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting
eclipse-wtp-webservices
hazelcast
jamonapi
jboss-logmanager-log4j
jbossws-common-tools
jdom2
log4j-jboss-logm
On 05/15/2014 10:44 AM, Jerry James wrote:
%{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both
have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT
compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to
rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like so:
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes from log4j and copy
them into their RPMs.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
On Qui, 2014-05-15 at 00:51 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>
> pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
> commit access for packag
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
> done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
> two “will need to be modified” references to Ruby/Java/Node.js .
The known affected pa
2014-05-15 22:49 GMT+02:00 T.C. Hollingsworth :
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to
> be
> > done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly
> the
> > two “will need to be modif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/15/2014 11:06 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
> important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac,
> mpqcare... ) marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct? As a
> c
That is true. The last ghemical release is from 2011 (v 3.0.0). We have
2.9.9 in Fedora.
To have this updated version I've created a COPR build here[1] (builds OK
on my machine).
Too bad I don't have the time to be a packager anymore...
[1] - http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lspooky/ghemical/
Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists today?
As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
them at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ppc/2014-May/date.html
I tried checking my mail options, at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/pp
On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 12:42:25 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> More fallout from pkgdb2?
I just send an email to this list about weird problems I have been
experiencing with the ppc mailing list. When I tried to log on to
check my options, I got a 502 proxy error about a DNS lookup fa
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:56 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:42 +0300, Marius A wrote:
>
> > Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
> > On Fedora 21, any way to apply these before installing to SDD from live usb
> > image? e.g. open terminal, run fs filter's, the
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:35:27PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 12:42:25 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > More fallout from pkgdb2?
>
Yeah. The script that updates the package email aliases was still pointing
at the staging instance (for testing). So it wasn't picking up
There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
>> I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
>>
>> The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
>
> Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes from log4j and copy
> them into their RP
25 matches
Mail list logo
