On 05/05/2014 09:21 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
For years, probably since the time of that document, I've had
Option"DontZap""off"
Option"ZapWarning""off"
somewhere in /etc/X11/xorg.con*. It used to work. Now it fails, but only
in Fedora (at least as far back as F14, worked
One of the biggest offenders (Eclipse) is now happily compiling(always has been
running fine) with Java 8 and while looking at fixing it many other issues has
been identified and fixed so personally I'm fine with OpenJDK7 being obsoleted
now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Origi
is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools for rhel-6 and
rhel-7?
On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> One of the biggest offenders (Eclipse) is now happily compiling(always has
> been running fine) with Java 8 and while looking at fixing it many other
> issues has be
- Original Message -
> From: "Farkas Levente"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:23:18 AM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
>
> is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools for rhel-6 and
> rhel-7?
As you probably h
Hi,
FYI, I just finished the update of PHPUnit 4.1 in rawhide/epel7.
This new major version is no more from pear channel, but from git
sources (the "phpunit" pear channel is no more updated and will closed
soon).
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094660
Bug ID: 1094660
Summary: ctstream-19 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ctstream
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
On 2014-05-06 00:13 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
For years, probably since the time of that document, I've had
Option"DontZap""off"
Option"ZapWarning""off"
somewhere in /etc/X11/xorg.con*. It used to work. Now it fails, but only
in Fedora
I plan to file bugs against packages which contain hard (i.e. not
reflection-based) references to internal OpenJDK classes and methods
which have been removed from OpenJDK 9. The total number of affected
packages is around 40. The bug reports will mention the recommended
replacements in the p
On 05/06/2014 02:00 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I plan to file bugs against packages which contain hard (i.e. not
> reflection-based) references to internal OpenJDK classes and methods
> which have been removed from OpenJDK 9. The total number of affected
> packages is around 40. The bug reports
at_console="true" (or similar) in a DBus policy file uses pam_console to
try to limit sending of messages to a DBus service.
This is an old relic from before polkit. Many distros that don't
implement it, or implement it completely differently. Last time I heard,
kdbus won't support it.
NetworkMan
Hi,
On 05/05/2014 05:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2014-05-05 12:34 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed:
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in
>>> multi-user, logging in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on
>>> tty3, where, as
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> Is there a good way to grep across the whole of Fedora to see which
> other packages have at_console in their /etc/dbus-1/*/* policy?
Here is one way to do this:
repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/dbus-1/*/*'
The above command will lis
On Fedora 20, I'm seeing this list:
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/bluetooth.conf: bluez-0:5.12-1.fc20.x86_64
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/com.redhat.NewPrinterNotification.conf:
system-config-printer-libs-0:1.4.3-2.fc20.noarch
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/com.redhat.PrinterDriversInstaller.conf:
system-config-printer-li
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:45:38PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of
> > funny.
>
> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
> allowed it.
>
> It mak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094395
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
2014-05-06 16:06 GMT+02:00 David Cantrell :
> I think the annoying thing is if you're typing out a path that includes
> /usr/lib, you can't easily hit TAB to get in to lib. And that's worth
> fixing.
>
Oh my...
1) With the existence of /usr/lib{,64}, the additional existence of
/usr/libexec doe
Hi All,
In my adventures in the world of Linux admin work I recently came across a need
for a package that isn't in the Fedora or EPEL repositories. This led me down
the path of submitting (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094804).
This is the my first attempt at packaging but am v
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:11:50PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>2014-05-06 16:06 GMT+02:00 David Cantrell <[1]dcantr...@redhat.com>:
>
> I think the annoying thing is if you're typing out a path that
> includes
> /usr/lib, you can't easily hit TAB to get in to lib. Â And that's
On 05/06/2014 12:25 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> %{_libexecdir} and %{_libdir}/$pkg are both valid in the packaging
> guidelines.
Yep, and both valid variants differ from what other distros use. Debian
uses /usr/lib/$pkg for @libexecdir@.
>
> If upstream is using the autotools you should ju
- Original Message -
> From: "Florian Weimer"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:00:54 PM
> Subject: [fedora-java] Mass-bug filing for removed OpenJDK 9 internal APIs
>
> I plan to file bugs against packa
Hey all,
I am going to push the update to stable. There were no reports of
misbehavior. In any case, check for AVC denials after Puppet upgrade and
relabel system if necessary.
LZ
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:46:33PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are rolling out update of Puppet to
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fedora 20, I'm seeing this list:
>
> /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-ifcfg-rh.conf:
> NetworkManager-1:0.9.9.0-38.git20131003.fc20.x86_64
> /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-user-settings.conf: sugar-0:0.100.2-1.fc20.noarch
> /etc/dbus-1/system.d/or
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:11:50PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2014-05-06 16:06 GMT+02:00 David Cantrell :
>
> > I think the annoying thing is if you're typing out a path that includes
> > /usr/lib, you can't easily hit TAB to get in to lib. And that's worth
> > fixing.
> >
>
> Oh my...
>
>
On 6 May 2014 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:11:50PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > 2014-05-06 16:06 GMT+02:00 David Cantrell :
> >
> > > I think the annoying thing is if you're typing out a path that includes
> > > /usr/lib, you can't easily hit TAB to get in to
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 12:34 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I've got a pair of odd build failures that I'm probably missing something
> obvious on. I'm trying to update both openvpn and dietlibc to their latest
> upstreams for rawhide. They build fine locally on f20, in mock for f20,
> and fail locall
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-05-06/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to e
27 matches
Mail list logo
