Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

2014-05-04 Thread Dave Young
On 04/30/14 at 09:02am, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the > list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few > more days before filing the actual bugs. > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >

rawhide report: 20140504 changes

2014-05-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
g.guess for newer arch support - Modernise spec file * Mon Nov 18 2013 Dave Airlie - 1.10.0-2 - rebuilt for GLEW 1.10 Size change: 268 bytes gnulib-0-8.20140504git.fc21 --- * Sun May 04 2014 Mosaab Alzoubi - 0-8.20140504git - Update on 20140504. Size change: 4346 byte

Re: bournal needs dependency

2014-05-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 01:44:01PM -0400, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote: > I recently have installed bournal, an encrypted journal program for > Fedora. > Although it installed with its dependencies, when run it said nano is > needed to run. > Whoever maintains this package, please add nano to the

Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi, Recently, the value of my PATH variable seems to be messed up: > [asinha@ankur-laptop ~]$ echo $PATH > /usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/home/asinha/.local/bin:/home/asinha/bin /usr/bin is supposed to come before /usr/sbin etc. This makes mock throw an er

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Reindl Harald
no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin and any software assuming the opposite has a bug look what binaries are in /usr/sbin and then you know you really don't want in general a bad package override them with place a binary with the same name in /usr/bin Am 04.05.2014 18:11,

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Björn Persson
Reindl Harald wrote: >no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin >and any software assuming the opposite has a bug > >Am 04.05.2014 18:11, schrieb Ankur Sinha: >> /usr/bin is supposed to come before /usr/sbin etc. I don't know of any kind of standard that specifies either. Does P

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Björn Persson: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin >> and any software assuming the opposite has a bug >> >> Am 04.05.2014 18:11, schrieb Ankur Sinha: >>> /usr/bin is supposed to come before /usr/sbin etc. > > I don'

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 02:11 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Recently, the value of my PATH variable seems to be messed up: > > > > [asinha@ankur-laptop ~]$ echo $PATH > > /usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/home/asinha/.local/bin:/home/asinha/bin The same.

Self Introduction: Pierre Marijon

2014-05-04 Thread Pierre Marijon
Hello all, I am Pierre Marijon, i study bioinformatic and on my free time i work on free (like freedom) video game "Ned et les maki" (Ned and the Makihttp:// geekygoblin.org/ned-et-les-maki/ not yet in english sorry about that). Now i work on akagoria (http://www.akagoria.org/) packaging another

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Björn Persson
Reindl Harald wrote: >Am 04.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Björn Persson: >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin >>> and any software assuming the opposite has a bug >>> >>> Am 04.05.2014 18:11, schrieb Ankur Sinha: /usr/bin is supposed to come before

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.05.2014 23:51, schrieb Björn Persson: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 04.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Björn Persson: >>> Reindl Harald wrote: no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin and any software assuming the opposite has a bug Am 04.05.2014 18:11, schrieb

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: > no, given that /usr/sbin/iptables is clearly a administrative > command and so there is no valid reason to seek for iptables > in /usr/bin/ nor have it as override is a logical conclusion And there's no reason to look in /usr/sbin for a clearly non-administ

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Rex Dieter
Reindl Harald wrote: > no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin > and any software assuming the opposite has a bug my /etc/profile contains: # Path manipulation if [ "$EUID" = "0" ]; then pathmunge /usr/sbin pathmunge /usr/local/sbin else pathmunge /usr/local/sbin

Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

2014-05-04 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 14:19 -0400, Ray Strode wrote: > This is probably from a recent gdm bug that was fixed upstream by this > commit: > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/commit/?id=c9bebed8724600aef6c401f21245f7678e45 Thanks Ray. I'll wait for a gdm update and see if that fixes it. -- Thank