Am 23.04.2014 07:52, schrieb Liam:
> On Apr 22, 2014 5:09 AM, "Christian Schaller" wrote:
>> I think this is a misunderstanding of who a developer might be and why they
>> choose
>> a system. Those of my friends and acquaintances, who are developers and who
>> over the
>> years have decided to
Hi Mairin,
Not sure exactly where you are coming from in terms of wanting legal
to weigh in, but in general I don't think legals opinion is very relevant
and this point. The first step here should always be us as a project deciding
what
user experience we want to offer our users, then once that i
On 4/22/14, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
[cut]
>>
>> Everything in our repos is free, so putting the choice in the
>> installer seems off to me. Our policy (which is complex and obviously
>> driven by things stronger than the UX) generally leaves it to users
>> post-install to add encumbered software.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> There are some aspects on this:
> - I don't think Fedora is able add non-free, patent-encumbered sw in
> e. g., in the way Ubuntu does - it fails on the fact that US law is
> applicable [...]
This has been repeated multiple times recently bu
On 4/23/14, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> There are some aspects on this:
>> - I don't think Fedora is able add non-free, patent-encumbered sw in
>> e. g., in the way Ubuntu does - it fails on the fact that US law is
>> applicable [...]
>
> This has bee
On 04/22/2014 09:17 PM, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:04 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:41 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:23 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:22 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200
Hi,
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:54 -0700, Arun SAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see openjdk-1.8.0 got built and pushed as an update for fedora 19
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=505651 .
>
>
> In the past the i686 rpms of openjdk were pushed into release x86_64
> repo of fedora 19
>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:51:21 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> I can only guess, but i386 updates being pushed to a x86_64 repo sounds
> like a bug to me.
No, it's a pretty normal thing the mash multilib compose strategy does.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mash.git/tree/
--
devel mailing lis
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:54:51 -0700, Arun SAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see openjdk-1.8.0 got built and pushed as an update for fedora 19
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=505651 .
>
>
> In the past the i686 rpms of openjdk were pushed into release x86_64
> repo of fedora 19
> (h
On 04/23/2014 12:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:51:21 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
>> I can only guess, but i386 updates being pushed to a x86_64 repo sounds
>> like a bug to me.
>
> No, it's a pretty normal thing the mash multilib compose strategy does.
> http://pkgs
On 04/23/2014 12:54 AM, Arun SAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see openjdk-1.8.0 got built and pushed as an update for fedora 19
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=505651 .
>
>
> In the past the i686 rpms of openjdk were pushed into release x86_64
> repo of fedora 19
> (http://mirrors
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:13:29 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 12:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:51:21 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> >
> >> I can only guess, but i386 updates being pushed to a x86_64 repo sounds
> >> like a bug to me.
> >
> > No, it's a
commit 686b7e2fa94276123d9b5a11b0ae452c6144d15c
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Apr 23 13:01:02 2014 +0200
The patch submitted as CPAN RT #94959
perl-libwww-perl.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-libwww-perl.spec b/perl-libwww-perl.spec
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:20:20 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 12:54 AM, Arun SAG wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see openjdk-1.8.0 got built and pushed as an update for fedora 19
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=505651 .
> >
> >
> > In the past the i686 rpms of
Hi,
the 0.5.0 is out today, Rawhide only for the moment. See also:
dnf.baseurl.org/2014/04/23/dnf-0-5-0-released/
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id31
Cheers,
Ales
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Dne 16.4.2014 15:44, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> On 2014-04-11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
> [...]
>> The BerkeleyDB, used between others by rpm [1], changed license between
>> versions 5.* and 6.* to
Hi!
As it seems, Fedora.Next and product planning leads also to changes
how Fedora is produced and how it's going to be distributed to our
users.
For this, we need to collect product deliverables, so needed changes
for release engineering can be planned (and implemented) and as I was
talking to De
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084093
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 94963
--
You are receiving this ma
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 11:37 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> There have been plans to query for the zone that should be used for a
> connection before activating this connection for the first time.
> There
> are even sketches for this. But as I said before, this has been
> rejected
> by the deskto
> Okay, count me in. Is there a BZ already in place for reporting issues or
> should such reports just go straight to Bodhi, or simply back here?
There is this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012426
Thanks a lot.
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
--
d
On 23 April 2014 02:29, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Hi Mairin,
> Not sure exactly where you are coming from in terms of wanting legal
> to weigh in, but in general I don't think legals opinion is very relevant
> and this point. The first step here should always be us as a project
> deciding what
Tested it on the latest amazon linux and it works perfectly. Thank you!
What are the next steps to get the change into EPEL?
-Tyler
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Tyler Brock wrote:
>
>> Hey Dave, hope you had a nice weekend.
>>
>> An
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23 April 2014 02:29, Christian Schaller wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mairin,
>> Not sure exactly where you are coming from in terms of wanting legal
>> to weigh in, but in general I don't think legals opinion is very relevant
>> and this
Would anyone like to swap reviews? I have 2 pending:
subunit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539
This subsumes the existing python-subunit package. It would be good
if the reviewer could verify that the python-subunit subpackage is
essentially equivalent to the existing python-s
With the fresh release of Audacious 3.5 final [1], I'm going to push this
new release also to Rawhide. It has been available via Copr [2] since
alpha1 already, and although I've not received any user feedback on the
pre-releases at all, I've evaluated it personally and also followed
upstream activi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services
>> include iptables and udev.
> I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's persistent and
> is
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:49:58AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> If no one tells me otherwise today, I will take the lack of objections
> to the mass bug filing as consensus.
Yeah, no objections from my side.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tyler Brock wrote:
> Tested it on the latest amazon linux and it works perfectly. Thank you!
>
> What are the next steps to get the change into EPEL?
>
> -Tyler
>
I'll add the patch to the git branch of llvm for EPEL6 and do the build. It
will then be available i
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services
> >> include iptables and udev.
> > I re
Great, will you let me know when it goes into testing?
-Tyler
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tyler Brock wrote:
>
>> Tested it on the latest amazon linux and it works perfectly. Thank you!
>>
>> What are the next steps to get the chang
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700
> Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> Examples of "runs once the
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 13:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:13:29 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> > On 04/23/2014 12:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:51:21 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > >
> > >> I can only guess, but i386 updates being pus
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-04-24 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-04-24 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-04-24 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-04-24 1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-04-24 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-04-24 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-04-24 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-04-24 1
James Antill wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket athttps://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the foll
On Wed, 23.04.14 13:15, Michael Cronenworth (m...@cchtml.com) wrote:
> James Antill wrote:
> > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> >this e-mail, file a new ticket athttps://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
> >e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, dur
Hello,
2014-04-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
>
At the FESCo meeting, we were unclear what happens to packages that don't
get updated; will they sty at v5, or will they (immediately, or aft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:29:21 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 21 Make 4.0 Update =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40
>
> Change owner(s): Patsy Franklin
>
> This change brings Make 4.0 to Fedor
On Apr 23, 2014 4:29 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 23.04.2014 07:52, schrieb Liam:
> > On Apr 22, 2014 5:09 AM, "Christian Schaller" wrote:
> >> I think this is a misunderstanding of who a developer might be and why
they choose
> >> a system. Those of my friends and acquaintances, who are
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Would it
>> make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
>> 'systemctl.*enable'?
>
>
> I'm attaching the hits for that pattern on the actual RPM scripts in Fedora
> rawhi
The lightweight tag 'perl-Child-0.010-2.fc21' was created pointing to:
d36a262... Downgrade Module::Build version requirement from 0.42 to 0.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> * PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services
>>> URL:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Priv
42 matches
Mail list logo
