On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:18:30PM +0100, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense to rename the cloud-utils
> > (sub-)package for EPEL7 and F21.
> >
> > Upstream (Ubuntu) used to have a single pac
Compose started at Mon Feb 24 08:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
On 02/19/2014 08:57 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
* Open floor (t8m, 19:45:44)
* AGREED: FESCo expects the Tech specs/docs from working groups by
March 3rd at the latest (+7, -0, 0:0) (t8m, 19:50:38)
* ACTION: t8m will update the weekly reports ticket with this request
(t8m, 19:53:08)
Am 24.02.2014 04:59, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected
>> during basic document manipulation" for packages which are not installable
>> at all due dependencie problems?
>
> Indeed, people giving +1 after manually
Thanks. Fixed.
> 1.15-2.fc21 didn't fix the file conflict problem.
>
> file /usr/share/man/mann/fifo.n.gz from install of tcllib-1.15-2.fc21.noarch
> conflicts with file from package memchan-2.3-4.fc20.i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Jerry James writes:
> I've got a few comments and questions about the recently filed bugs asking
> us to switch from Requires: java to Requires: java-headless. First, the
> bugs list some web pages to view for more information. Number two on that
> list is this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wi
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> Date: 02/21/2014 17:05
> Subject: Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21)
> meeting minutes and logs
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 16:38 -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
>
> > > With the best of intent
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:16:59PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > 2) Report packages which *don't* have any test suites at all.
> Could you provide the rationale for 2? Why do you want to do it and
> what does Fedora gain by doing it?
Better code quality, less risk of regressions
> From: li...@colorremedies.com
> To: Bruno Wolff III
> Date: 02/22/2014 17:38
> Subject: Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21)
> meeting minutes and logs
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Fri
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 03:37:40PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 19:08:15 -0700,
> > Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> The idea of what Anaconda can do to create powerful storage stacks with
> >> open source softw
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 17:08 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>
> > Installer is still a hot topic, but thats nothing we could resolve
> > during our meeting and which might have to be brought up with FESCO again.
>
> So, as cmurf has been trying to point out on desktop@ ,
- Original Message -
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 03:37:40PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 19:08:15 -0700,
> > > Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The idea of what Anaconda can do to create powerfu
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
# additional repository
fedora-{incubator,ugly}
* better name than ugly based on content of repo
* github-like frontend for copr
* discuss policies/procedures for accepting copr repo
#SCL in Fedora
* base on needs for pr
Hello,
I would like to unretire NDOUtils in Fedora, I'm currently using it at work.
NDOUtils was orphaned in Fedora in 2012 [1], but since the EPEL 5 & 6
branches cannot be retired, those branches were still there. The previous
owner gave the branch ownership to me, so I'm missing only the Fedora
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
8 packages were orphaned
ghc-IOSpec [devel,f20] was orphaned by petersen
A pure specification of the IO monad
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ghc-IOSpec
Perlba
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:06:47 +0100
Martin Gieseking wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally, I found some time to update one of my bigger packages (zorba)
> to the latest release and to adapt it to build successfully on f21.
> However, the package (still) fails to build for armv7hl. The generated
> binary segf
Am 24.02.2014 16:49, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:06:47 +0100 Martin Gieseking
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> finally, I found some time to update one of my bigger packages
>> (zorba) to the latest release and to adapt it to build
>> successfully on f21. However, the package (still)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr: FESCo needs to know what is going to need extra time to deliver
Fedora.next in the Fedora 21 cycle.
Now that the Fedora.next product PRDs have been approved, the next
phase is to plan our execution. First of all, this will mean planning
out ho
On Feb 24, 2014 1:46 AM, "Marcela Mašláňová" wrote:
>
> On 02/19/2014 08:57 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>
>> * Open floor (t8m, 19:45:44)
>>* AGREED: FESCo expects the Tech specs/docs from working groups by
>> March 3rd at the latest (+7, -0, 0:0) (t8m, 19:50:38)
>>* ACTION: t8m will upd
>> Slightly off-topic: fedora-review is telling packagers NOT to add
>> "Requires: jpackage-utils" to javadoc subpackages because that is added
>> automatically, but I see no mention of this on
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java.
>
> Guidelines state that package must have "R: jpackag
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
>
> == Topic ==
> # additional repository
> fedora-{incubator,ugly}
> * better name than ugly based on content of repo
> * github-like frontend for copr
> * discuss policies/
On 24 February 2014 10:44, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> As a non-exhaustive list of example things we expect will need
> attention and would like input (particularly time-estimates) on:
>
> * Quality Assurance: Coverage increases and automation such as
>Task-o-Tron[1]
> * Release Engineer
Hi,
sorry that i am replying so late. I checked your suggestions, replaced
/usr/bin with
%{_bindir}. I also gave there 0%{?el5} shortcut
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
On 2014-02-21 10:55, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:28:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/21/2014 01:14 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:24AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> +1 I still have an application that is slowly moving to 1.5 but
>> not ther
Hello everybody,
Just that. Why is not included JFS on Anaconda?
It's interesting JFS uses bit CPU usage to access data. I was reading
about it. However, I saw that ext4 takes more CPU usage to access
data.
Could be include JFS into Anaconda to next release? What's your
opinion about JFS?
--
de
25 matches
Mail list logo
