Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

- Original Message - > From: "Przemek Klosowski" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 10:43:16 PM > Subject: Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be > listed in software center > > On 02/14/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Williamson w

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

On 17 February 2014 08:45, Christian Schaller wrote: > That said we should list the Developer Assistant in the Software center (or > even have it installed by default) > and that should be the tool IMHO to install these and other developer tools. It's already in the software center (and ships an

rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

are such changes allowed within a stable release? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit : > are such changes allowed within a stable release? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563 As lot of package are using a bad virtual provides / requires with a double dash in EVR, and as a

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit : >> are such changes allowed within a stable release? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563 > > As lot of package are using a bad

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

Am 17.02.2014 11:37, schrieb Ville Skyttä: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit : >>> are such changes allowed within a stable release? >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

On 02/17/2014 11:37 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit : are such changes allowed within a stable release? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563 A

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild > actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect > runtime at all, only build time, and affected packages can be just > fixed at the same time if

how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 rubygem(minitest) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 [builduser@buildserver

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote: [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 rubygem(minitest) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote: [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 rubygem(minitest) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 rubygem(minitest) is needed by

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth: > On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec >> error: Failed build dependencies: >> perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by >> subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64 >>

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On 17/02/14 11:13, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth: On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote: [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1.8.5-

Package takeover request - pidgin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a > bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him? > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220 > > Ch

unsure for which package report a bug

what happened below is typing "rpmü" followed by a backspace interesting is that it results in a error message and in the history you have to press backspace again to get rid of a invisible char INTERESTING: * normally the machine is german * this happens only after LANG=C

Re: unsure for which package report a bug

On 02/17/2014 12:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: what happened below is typing "rpmü" followed by a backspace interesting is that it results in a error message and in the history you have to press backspace again to get rid of a invisible char INTERESTING: * normally the machine is german * this hap

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On 02/17/2014 12:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth: On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote: [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec error: Failed build dependencies: perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by subversion-1

[Bug 1062968] systemd failed to run vncserver due to permission issues

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968 --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Grepl --- This works on F20 because of initrc_t -> unconfined_t transition which has been removed in F20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

New PCRE API proposal

Many of you use regular expressions. Many of the expression are more than regular. They can be called Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions (PCRE). Those who need to support PCRE in their code use usually the well-known PCRE library . PCRE library maintainers decided to design

Re: Package takeover request - pidgin

Jan, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a >> bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him

Re: Package takeover request - pidgin

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote: > Jan, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now

gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

Hi, See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Package takeover request - pidgin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2014 01:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote: > Jan, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've been trying to c

[perl-IPC-Shareable/epel7] (3 commits) ...Update to 0.61

Summary of changes: 6349ee2... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) a33e831... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 55d78df... Update to 0.61 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

On 17 February 2014 08:45, Christian Schaller wrote: > > Well with GCC we are assuming people will read docs and figure out the command > line parameters needed to use gcc. So expecting people to read the docs on how > to use yum or 'yum search' is not expecting to much in my opinion. > > That s

[perl-Test-Pod] Declare run-time dependency on File::Find

commit d7fd0c9ad397bb4cd13e5e36d9be41b64c18bf0e Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Feb 17 14:50:17 2014 +0100 Declare run-time dependency on File::Find perl-Test-Pod.spec |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec b/perl-Test-Pod.spec ind

[perl-Log-Any] Bootstrap of EPEL-7 done

commit 9680f0175314fe48ee9528586641d387f595d04f Author: Paul Howarth Date: Mon Feb 17 13:50:55 2014 + Bootstrap of EPEL-7 done perl-Log-Any.spec |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Log-Any.spec b/perl-Log-Any.spec index 098e0e7..2042

Re: additional repository with {experimental,incubating} content

On 02/12/2014 04:58 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Yesterday we spoke at Env and Stacks WG about Fedora additional repository. I was wondering what might other products need to put there. Will be the content experimental? Would it be the content just developing (not good for main Fedora repository)

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

- Original Message - > Hi, > > See: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the updates from F20 into master. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:17:18AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > Hi, > > > > See: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 > > It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the > updates > from F20 into master. If

[perl-Log-Any] Created tag perl-Log-Any-0.15-3.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-Log-Any-0.15-3.fc21' was created pointing to: 9680f01... Bootstrap of EPEL-7 done -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl

[perl-Log-Any] Created tag perl-Log-Any-0.15-2.el7

The lightweight tag 'perl-Log-Any-0.15-2.el7' was created pointing to: c19badf... Bootstrap EPEL-7 build -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-de

Re: additional repository with {experimental,incubating} content

On 02/17/2014 02:58 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: On 02/12/2014 04:58 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Yesterday we spoke at Env and Stacks WG about Fedora additional repository. I was wondering what might other products need to put there. Will be the content experimental? Would it be the content just dev

Re: ModemManager update

On Sex, 2014-02-14 at 09:18 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote: > > > > With a companion libraries. ;) > > > > > > > > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 >

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 57 packages were orphaned - ghc-arrows [devel,f19] was orphaned by shakthimaan Classes that extend the Arrow class https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ghc-arrows gn

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

Hi, On 02/17/2014 03:17 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> Hi, >> >> See: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 > > It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the > updates > from F20 into master. rhughes just bumped i

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-02-18)

WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Topic == # additional repository fedora-{incubator,ugly} * prepare proposal for additional repository based on discussion from mailing list https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2014-February/000173.html https

[perl-qpid_proton/epel7] Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packages.

Summary of changes: f7f557f... Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packa (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Briza wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > >[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec > >error: Failed build dependencies: > >perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by > >subvers

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

On 17 February 2014 15:45, Hans de Goede wrote: > rhughes just bumped it to 3.11.0, so this is fixed now, I'll go > and close the bug. Actually, mclazy picked it up automatically, I can't claim credit :) Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: how does somobeody install perl(ExtUtils::Embed)

Am 17.02.2014 17:42, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Briza wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> >>> >>> [builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec >>> error: Failed build dependencies:

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:56:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild > > actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect > > runtime at all, only build t

Re: rpm bug 1065563 affecting httpd / php packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2014 18:02, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > I think this depends on what rpm and yum are currently doing with > the dependencies. As Panu says here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563#c1 if "-" is > used in version or release

[Bug 820663] update of Finance::Quote

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820663 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.20-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Finance-Quote-1.20-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

Good Fedora-compatible multi-monitor video card recommendation

Hi all, What would be a good (as in, relatively painless) video card for driving as many 1080p monitors as possible? I'm not concerned about 3D performance at all... It will be to display terminals/rarely-changing web pages only. I know Matrox sort of specializes in multi-monitor setups, but

Ignore - Re: Good Fedora-compatible multi-monitor video card recommendation

Sorry, I meant to post this to the general user's list. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: "a stop job is running for User Manager for 0"

On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 14:43 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > I'm using a minimal netinstall version of fedora20 for testing using > KVM. We very often cycle these machines (once per test, we run hundreds > of tests) > > Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60 > seconds,