Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Sandro Mani
On 16.02.2014 04:00, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Sandro Mani > wrote: The salome-kernel srpm is here [1]. I see now that I actually didn't completely finish salome-gui... Interesting... You're extracting just the kernel module... M

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 16.02.2014 04:00, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> The salome-kernel srpm is here [1]. I see now that I actually didn't >> completely finish salome-gui... >> > > Interesting... You're ext

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-02-16 Thread Richard Hughes
On 14 February 2014 21:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > If we are providing a next-generation UI for installing, to replace yum That's not what we're doing. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Self Introduction: Mauricio Tavares

2014-02-16 Thread Mauricio Tavares
What can I say about me? First of all, my goals to be here are not as life-changing as many of you. I want to learn how to build and test fendora/redhat packages. And then help keep some packages I like (I am a selfish bastard) alive and maybe even updated. Perhaps help deal with whatever iss

Orphaning 'shakthimaan' packages

2014-02-16 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, Due to work constrains, I am not able to devote enough time for Fedora packaging, and would like to orphan the packages that I maintain. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/shakthimaan If you are interested in taking ownership of the packages, please feel free to do so. Re

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Sandro Mani
On 16.02.2014 14:56, Richard Shaw wrote: [snip] I wonder if we could do a staged review instead, for instance, have a review request just for the kernel, then create a separate review request for smesh but make the kernel review request a blocker for it. I think this would break the reviews

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Sandro Mani
On 16.02.2014 16:58, Sandro Mani wrote: [snip] So the roadmap is basically to get python-omniORB and OCE in fedora, and then we can start moving with salome-kernel and the rest. libbatch is also needed, which I also had lying around. I've quickly updated it and posted it for review, see [1].

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 16.02.2014 14:56, Richard Shaw wrote: > > [snip] > > I wonder if we could do a staged review instead, for instance, have a > review request just for the kernel, then create a separate review request > for smesh but make the kernel revie

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Sandro Mani
On 16.02.2014 20:41, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Sandro Mani > wrote: On 16.02.2014 14:56, Richard Shaw wrote: [snip] I wonder if we could do a staged review instead, for instance, have a review request just for the kernel

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Looking at this, we don't necessarily need to do the reviews 1 for 1 per > module, but perhaps make smesh and it's requirements one "review". What do > you think? > > Fine with me. I had a quick look at updating adapting my salome-kernel for

Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

2014-02-16 Thread Sandro Mani
On 17.02.2014 00:43, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Mani > wrote: Looking at this, we don't necessarily need to do the reviews 1 for 1 per module, but perhaps make smesh and it's requirements one "review". What do you think

Re: Orphaning 'shakthimaan' packages

2014-02-16 Thread Christopher Meng
You only have one package? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning 'shakthimaan' packages

2014-02-16 Thread पराग़
Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > You only have one package? > > After sending email here, Shakthi Kannan has orphaned all his packages. That single package is displayed due to his co-ownership in f19 branch. Regards, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorap

Re: Orphaning 'shakthimaan' packages

2014-02-16 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: | You only have one package? \-- I have orphaned them. For some I was a watcher and had commit access. Here is the list: CUnit LaPlot QtDMM SuperLU alliance archimedes brainfuck cbmc cgnslib covered csmith dgc dia-CMOS dia-Digital

[Test-Announce] 2014-02-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2014-02-16 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2014-02-17 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! Things are still moving a bit slowly, but it's been three weeks si