Re: ModemManager update

2014-02-01 Thread poma
With a companion libraries. ;) ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 ↗ libqmi-1.8.0 ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0 poma Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling >From glen to glen, and down the mountain side The summer's gone, and all the flowers are dying 'Tis you, 'tis you must go and I must bide. diff --git a/libq

ModemManager update

2014-02-01 Thread poma
Danny Boy, to catch a wave. ;) poma diff --git a/ModemManager.spec b/ModemManager.spec index 13fa901..f14a5c7 100644 --- a/ModemManager.spec +++ b/ModemManager.spec @@ -6,15 +6,12 @@ Summary: Mobile broadband modem management service Name: ModemManager -Version: 1.1.0 -Release: 2%{snapsho

Re: ModemManager update

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:03:36 +0100 poma wrote: > > With a companion libraries. ;) > > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 > ↗ libqmi-1.8.0 > ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0 Were these sent to the list for feedback on the changes? They seem fine to me from a quick glance. I don't know if there's more things that need to be

f20, anaconda, net install and video out of range ....

2014-02-01 Thread Paul Wouters
Hi, I tried to help a friend upgrade his redhat 7.3 server (!) to something more modern. Since his server's BIOS had issues with booting from DVD, I setup a PXE environment on my laptop and booted the net-install (and later the live image) kernel and ram disk. After PXE boot, and leaving the li

Re: f20, anaconda, net install and video out of range ....

2014-02-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On 1 February, 2014 10:18:25 AM PST, Paul Wouters wrote: > >Hi, > >I tried to help a friend upgrade his redhat 7.3 server (!) to >something more modern. Since his server's BIOS had issues with >booting from DVD, I setup a PXE environment on my laptop and >booted the net-install (and later the live

Re: Packages installing files to /etc/rpm

2014-02-01 Thread Richard Hughes
On 31 January 2014 20:23, Ville Skyttä wrote: > kwizart color-filesystem rhughes Fixed, thanks. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: f20, anaconda, net install and video out of range ....

2014-02-01 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Adam Williamson wrote: You can't do a text install from a live image, but you can from DVD or net inst. We'd need the x logs to know what was going on with x startup. I did not keep a copy of the X log, but it showed no problems. It logged various screens in resolutions an

Re: f20, anaconda, net install and video out of range ....

2014-02-01 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Adam Williamson wrote: You can't do a text install from a live image, but you can from DVD or net inst. We'd need the x logs to know what was going on with x startup. Using the netinstall's isolinux/ vmlinuz,initrd and pxelinux.cfg file, the machine (physical but also VMs

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Until now, I am still unable to grasp the sense of "Fedora.NEXT". > All in all, to me all I've read so far sounds like being a lot of effort > with undefined, unclear or questionable outcome. Indeed. I don't understand why we are doing that "Fedora.NEXT" thing in the first

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Right now, the vision essentially looks like: > > Fedora Products: This *is* Fedora. It comes in three flavors. I don't like the hardcoded "three" there at all, because if KDE is to ever become a full-fledged Product (which IMHO it should have been from the beginning!

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > 1) Are Spins useful as they currently exist? Yes. Just see how many people do, indeed, use them. > 2) Should Spins be eliminated entirely in favor of Fedora Remixes[1]. No! HELL NO! Reducing Fedora to those 3 uninteresting "Products" would be a huge step backwards. >

Re: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs log4j-chainsaw

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > 2) RPM doesn't differentiate between dependency scopes. Some > dependencies may be required only in some contexts, for example only for > testing, or only when using that package to compile other packages. In > the latter case one would normally put these dependencies in

Re: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs log4j-chainsaw

2014-02-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > That would certainly help from theoretical point of view, but that's not > really maintainable. Adding hundreds of empty packages just to improve > dependencies isn't the right way to go, IMHO. This should be fixed in > the infrastructure. IMHO, adding hundreds of empty

Re: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs log4j-chainsaw

2014-02-01 Thread Rex Dieter
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > 2) RPM doesn't differentiate between dependency scopes. Some > dependencies may be required only in some contexts, for example only for > testing, or only when using that package to compile other packages. In > the latter case one would normally put these dependencies i

Re: ModemManager update

2014-02-01 Thread poma
On 01.02.2014 18:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:03:36 +0100 > poma wrote: > >> >> With a companion libraries. ;) >> >> ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 >> ↗ libqmi-1.8.0 >> ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0 > > Were these sent to the list for feedback on the changes? Everything is change. :) > They seem fi