Hi,
I have updated Python in Rawhide to version 2.7.6. The build is already
tagged as f21. As far as I checked, the API/ABI should remain the same.
Most patches applied neatly, only a few needed a rebase, and two were
1:1 incorporated upstream.
If something Python-related starts acting up, try lo
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Les Howell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 07:47 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Jaroslav Reznik"
>>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:25:10 PM
>
On 30 January 2014 23:02, Richard Fearn wrote:
>> You may have used this kind
>> of thing - it tells you 'click this next' and waits until you do.
>> As you might expect, googling for anything along these lines without
>> having a very precise set of keywords only returns pages of tutorials.
>> An
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:03:48 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> What this does reveal is a bigger problem: that the audiences of at
> least some of the spins are not aware of this relationship to the
> larger Fedora ecosystem. This would indicate that the "dropping" or
> de-promoting the spin
On 30 January 2014 23:07, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
>> On 01/29/2014 07:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
>> they have value
Hi,
I've sent two builds of linux-firmware to koji this morning and both
fail with a strange error in root.log/mock_output.log:
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['fedpkg', 'sources']
Downloading linux-firmware-20140131.tar.gz
error: line 41: Double separato
27;sources']
> Downloading linux-firmware-20140131.tar.gz
> error: line 41: Double separator '-' in: iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-4:
> Obsoletes: iwl100-firmware < iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-4
must be
Obsoletes: iwl100-firmware < 39.31.5.1-4
it's a new sanity check pr
commit bf573f4561ebee24c507160f5b28b6084d179a68
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri Jan 31 14:17:07 2014 +0100
1.11 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec |8 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 delet
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 06:03 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> What this does reveal is a bigger problem: that the audiences of at least
> some of the spins are not aware of this relationship to the larger Fedora
> ecosystem. This would indicate that the "dropping" or de-promoting the spins
>
;>
>> ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
>> # ['fedpkg', 'sources']
>> Downloading linux-firmware-20140131.tar.gz
>> error: line 41: Double separator '-' in: iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-4:
>> Obsoletes: iwl100-firmware < iwl100-firm
Dne 31.1.2014 14:20, Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 06:03 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
What this does reveal is a bigger problem: that the audiences of at least some of the
spins are not aware of this relationship to the larger Fedora ecosystem. This would
indicate that t
>From the release note request:
gpodder is being upgraded from 2.20.3 to 3.5.2.
There is a configuration and date storage change between these versions.
After upgrading the RPM, any user on the system who uses gpodder, prior
to opening it, should run /usr/bin/gpodder-migrate2tres, which will
migr
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:20:18 -0500
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I've seen mails on this list recently where people proudly stated that
> they would continue to advertise one particular spin at conferences
> etc
The current product is not Gnome, it is Fedora.
And if asked about Xfce, which I solely u
mmand failed. See logs for output.
# ['fedpkg', 'sources']
Downloading linux-firmware-20140131.tar.gz
error: line 41: Double separator '-' in: iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-4:
Obsoletes: iwl100-firmware < iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-4
must be
Obsoletes: iwl100-firmware
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:34:17 +0100
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Fedora isn't a Gnome OS, perhaps that's what they're trying to
> convey; making it one will most probably create less confusion but
> I'm sure it will also make us less relevant (my personal opinion).
Currently it's not, it is a default DE,
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:34 +0100, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Fedora isn't a Gnome OS, perhaps that's what they're trying to convey;
> making it one will most probably create less confusion but I'm sure it
> will also make us less relevant (my personal opinion).
Not sure why that was necessary, but I
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
I would be happy if Fedora moves towards being an OS,
Red Hat Enterprise Linux comes in both Server and Workstation variants,
among others. To continue to serve a useful role as upstream, I
believe Fedora should be able to do *both* of
Apologies for the late notice everyone, but as i've been head of heels
in tons of other work the past week and quite a few folks are either
traveling or attending FOSDEM this weekend we're canceling the meeting
today.
Next week we'll have to see with a lot of people being at DevConf in
Brno/C
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 11:22 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:03:48 -0500 (EST)
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > What this does reveal is a bigger problem: that the audiences of at
> > least some of the spins are not aware of this relationship to the
> > larger Fedora ecosystem.
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:53:17 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Personally, I know currently, most DEs' can be installed with yum
> > groupinstall. But, that may not always be the case.
>
> I haven't seen any indication that anyone wants that to change as part
> of .next.
I do sincerely hope you
The lightweight tag 'perl-autobox-2.77-2.el7' was created pointing to:
bcfce90... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
Summary of changes:
6d58c92... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
b935bce... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
f62ffa1... Update to 1.23 (*)
17bad99... Update to 1.24 (*)
40163f7... Update to 1.25 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail s
A number of packages install files to /etc/rpm in Rawhide; the proper
place for macros.* is /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d for rpm >= 4.11. And no
matter what the location, these files should not be marked as %config.
Specfiles not targeting EL < 7 can simply replace %{_sysconfdir}/rpm
with %{_rpmconfigdir
On 31.01.2014 21:23, Ville Skyttä wrote:
smani keyrings-filesystem (none)
Fixed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
* Frank Murphy [31/01/2014 11:22] :
>
> Personally, I know currently, most DEs' can be installed with yum
> groupinstall. But, that may not always be the case.
I'm going to go in the opposite direction. The old anaconda installer made it
hard to see what groups you were installing and how you coul
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:50:59 +0100
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Frank Murphy [31/01/2014 11:22] :
> >
> > Personally, I know currently, most DEs' can be installed with yum
> > groupinstall. But, that may not always be the case.
>
> I'm going to go in the opposite direction. The old anaconda instal
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 15:30 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
> that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
>
> During today's FESCo meeting, there was the start of a discussion on
> how to approve new Products into the Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060360
Bug ID: 1060360
Summary: Request branch
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Mail-MboxParser
Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com
Reporter: nathan...@gnat.ca
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:37:02 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> So in my new constructive spirit ;) let me take a crack at some
> answers to this:
>
> I think the Spins process as it currently exists has a lot of
> problems. We've been saying this for years, long before we even
> thought about Fedor
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 16:22 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The desktop spins are the ones that seem most important to keep. I
> > think there's a reasonable argument for dropping most or all of the
> > non-desktop spins, because they're essentially just vehicles for
> > delivering package groups, w
Hello everybody,
I'm new in Fedora Devel list, using fedora and centos for years, and I intend
to become -official- packager for my own project, Pandora FMS, a server/network
monitoring project. I'm looking for a sponsor who guide me in the wonders of
the fedora packaging. I have being creating
31 matches
Mail list logo
